The Writings Of And About John McCarthy
Treachery And Treason Page
5
October 2004 - January 2005
Ad Submissions
LW,
Can you spell perseverance?
Wow, a busy dude! I know it's
early for responses on the "McCarthy saga" but you know top secret court-martial's involving conspiracy to obstruct justice
in a capital murder case during wartime and involving treason against the President by the NSC during wartime is NOT political,
therefore, I would anticipate a more imaginative response to this request. Ft. Huachuca, the head of the Military Intelligence
Command and School should be a treasure trove as well as Ft. Meade, Maryland and Arlington Hall, VA.
Thanks!
Bests,
John
Recap of Activity re LWB's Ad Submissions
Friday, October 22, 2004
E-Mail to Mr. Katz:
SUBJECT:
Recap of Activity re LWB's Ad Submissions During the Period Sept. 24, 2004 -- Oct. 22, 2004: (Text of ads below)
A.
Blow the Whistle on Iraqnam's Battle-of-Baghdad Cover-up!
- Submitted on 24 Sep 04 to the commander of Navy Region Mid-Atlantic for publication in the "Flagship" (via public affairs
officer -- Robert.mehal@navy.mil). Rejected on Oct. 5, 2004; reason: the anti-political-ads provision of DoD Instruction 5120.4
(16 June 1997).
- Submitted on 26 Sep 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Quantico, Quantico, Va., for publication in the "Sentry"
(via public affairs officer -- Capt. William.matory@nmci.usmc.mil). Rejected via Matory's phone call to LWB on 27 Sep 04;
reason: alleged conflict with the anti-"political"-ads provision of DoD Instruction 5120.4.
- Submitted on 25 Sep 04 to the commander of the USAF 1st Fighter Wing, Langley Air Force Base, Va., for publication in
the "Flyer" (via public affairs officer -- Jeffry.glenn@langley.af.mil). Awaiting Capt. Glenn's completion of his review.
- Submitted on 25 Sep 04 to the commander of Fort Eustis, Va., for publication in the "Wheel" (via public affairs officer
-- yourc@eustis.army.mil). Rejected on Oct. 12, 2004; reason: "After careful deliberation and at the advice of the Staff Judge
Advocate, the Garrison Commander has declined your request to advertise in the Wheel newspaper." -- Cindy L. Your
- Submitted on 25 Sep 04 to the commander of Fort Lee, Va., for publication in the "Traveller" (via public affairs officer
-- sweeneyp@lee.army.mil). Tentatively rejected on Oct. 8, 2004 (awaiting commander's final decision); reason: "advertisement
... classified as political in nature." -- P. Sweeney
- Submitted on 28 Sep 04 to the commander of Fort Belvoir, Va., for publication in the "Eagle" (via public affairs officer
-- carrdona@belvoir.army.mil). Rejected on Oct. 8, 2004; reason: "Larry, we won't be using the ad in our Command Information
newspaper. Recommend you consider the commercial press as a more appropriate outlet." -- Donald N. Carr
- Submitted on 28 Sep 04 to the commander of Andrews Air Force Base, Md., for publication in the "Capital Flyer" (via public
affairs officer). Rejected on Oct. 14, 2004; reason: by an unexplained fiat of the "Capital Flyer" staff (see my entry for
ad No. F(1)).
- Submitted on 6 Oct 04 to the superintendent of the U. S. Military Academy (West Point, N.Y.) for publication in the "Pointer
View" (via public affairs officer -- kent.cassella@usma.edu). Rejected on Oct. 7, 2004; reason: "Your ad below does not clear
our review process as it appears to be in conflict with the official DoD position on the matter." -- Joseph V. Tombrello
- Submitted on 2 Oct 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, N.C., for publication in the "Globe" (via public
affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 3 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Benning, Ga., for publication in the "Bayonet" (via public affairs officer).
Rejected on Oct. 18, 2004; reason: "We are prohibited by Army Regulation from carrying political ads." -- Rich McDowell
- Submitted on 3 Oct 04 to the garrison commander of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., for publication
in the "Stripe" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of Scott Air Force Base, Ill., for publication in the "Command Post" (via public
affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer).
Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., for publication in the "Thunderbolt" (via public
affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public
affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 6 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Leavenworth, Kans., for publication in the "Lamp" (via public affairs officer).
Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 6 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Sam Houston, Texas, for publication in the "News Leader" (via public affairs
officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via
public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
B. Blow the Whistle on ALL Atrocities at Abu Ghraib!
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 9 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Riley, Kans., for publication in the "Post" (via public affairs officer).
Rejected; reason: interference with command's mission?
- Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Sill, Okla., for publication in the "Cannoneer" (via public affairs officer).
Rejected; reason: interference with command's mission?
- Submitted on 9 Oct 04 to Navy Region Mid-Atlantic public affairs officer Lt. Cdr. Robert S. Mehal for publication in the
"Flagship." Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to USMA public affairs officer Maj. Kent Cassella for publication in the "Pointer View." Awaiting
a response.
- Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the Scott Air Force Base public affairs officer for publication in the "Command Post." Awaiting
a reply.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer).
Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., for publication in the "Sentry." Awaiting
a response from Capt. Matory.
- Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., for publication in the "Thunderbolt." Awaiting
a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst." Awaiting
a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via
public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
C. Blow the Whistle on the Army-CIA McCarthy Saga!
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Polk, La., for publication in the "Guardian" (via public affairs officer).
Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the Scott Air Force Base public affairs officer for publication in the "Command Post." Awaiting
a response.
- Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to U. S. Military Academy public affairs officer Maj. Kent Casella for publication in the "Pointer
View." Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer).
Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., for publication in the "Sentry." Awaiting
a response from Capt. William Matory.
- Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., for publication in the "Thunderbolt." Awaiting
a response.
- Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public
affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via
public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
D. Join the Revolt Against the "Feres Doctrine"!
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer).
Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 15 Oct 04 to the Fort Riley "Post" editor (Mike Heronemus). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 15 Oct 04 to Fort Sill public affairs officer N. Elliott for publication in the "Cannoneer." Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public
affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via
public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
E. Blow the Whistle on the Military's Psychiatric Retaliation Against Whistleblowers!
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer).
Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public
affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via public affairs
officer). Awaiting a response.
F. Blow the Whistle on Commanders' Ad Censorship!
- Submitted on 13 Oct 04 to the commander of Andrews Air Force Base, Md., for publication in the "Capital Flyer" (via public
affairs officer). Rejected on Oct. 14, 2004; reason: "The Capital Flyer will not be able to support this ad [and/or the BOBCUP
ad? -- LWB] in our paper." -- "Capital Flyer" staff
G. Resist the Government's Drafty Spin!
- Submitted on 21 Oct 04 to the superintendent of the U. S. Air Force Academy, Colorado, for publication in the "Academy
Spirit" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
- Submitted on 21 Oct 04 to the commander of Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., for publication in the "Space & Missile
Times" (via public affairs officer) Awaiting a response.
TEXT OF EACH OF THE SUBMITTED CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENTS, IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE:
A. Blow the Whistle on Iraqnam's
Battle-of-Baghdad Cover-up!
A group of current/former U. S. servicemembers -- known as the Ghost Troop (http://geocities.com/onlythecaptain/) -- has found the "bloody knife" exposing the OFFICIALLY UNRELEASED number of Americans who died during the fierce battle
at Iraq's capital in the spring of 2003. That number, of course, dwarfs the officially released count. To help determine the
discrepancy's cause/perpetuators/accountability, the group is seeking all related documentary evidence and sworn testimony
from all BOBCUP whistleblowers brave enough to come forward. Armed with your accounts, the group can help persuade Congress
to exercise its oversight authority in this matter. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at: 703-931-3341 (e-mail: overtCI@cavtel.net).
B. Blow the Whistle on ALL Atrocities at Abu Ghraib!
Now that the Center for Public Integrity has received
"leakage" of highly incriminating documentation about the U.S.-led debacle in Iraqnam's Abu Ghraib prison (see: http://www.publicintegrity.org), you have a chance to add YOUR whistleblower voice to this expose if you (or someone you know) possess additional evidence
of such gross impropriety. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net.
C. Blow the Whistle
on the Army-CIA McCarthy Saga!
Near the end of the Vietnam war, then-special forces captain John J. McCarthy, Jr.,
found himself involuntarily transferred to clandestine duty with a CIA-run operation called "Project Cherry." There, close
to the Cambodian border, he had no idea what lay ahead for his Army career -- and for his well-being as a U. S. citizen. That
transfer resulted in his being railroaded as an expendable pawn in rogue activity that, to this day, eludes even congressional
oversight. And, even in today's wartime situation, we see that the inadequate oversight perpetuates treasonous conduct amidst
the president's closest advisors, the "intelligence community." McCarthy's continuing story provides enough foreign intrigue,
official skulduggery, and personal pathos to warrant an Oliver Stone-type docudrama. But before such a blockbuster expose
of official U.S.-led treachery and treason in wartime can reach the screen (and hence consign him to history as hero rather
than villain), he needs to hear from all prospective whistleblowers brave enough to help bring to account all perpetrators
of this career-ending episode in U. S. military-intelligence abuse and of its subsequent, ongoing cover-up. Contact: Larry
W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net.
D. Join the Revolt Against the "Feres Doctrine"!
Most
prospective (and too many current) servicemembers who sign up for military service fail to realize that their doing so automatically
cancels out their constitutional right to seek litigative redress for official wrongs done unto them during any period of
service. This 50-some-year-old congressionally accepted, dehumanizing booby trap is being challenged by a dedicated group
of military veterans known as the Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy (http://www.verpa.org). Of course, VERPA members keenly realize the urgency of their revolt, now that our nation's younger citizenry might face
the renewal of conscription because of Iraqnam. What's more: should certain U.S.-led activity in Iraqnam ever get adjudged
as criminality by a Nuremberg-styled court of inquiry, imagine how many servicemenbers (and their families) will flood the
ranks of "Feres" victimhood! If you (or someone you know) already have been victimized by "Feres," VERPA wants to add your
account to its case for reform. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net
E. Blow the
Whistle on the Military's Psychiatric Retaliation Against Whistleblowers!
Supposing you've acquired hard evidence of
waste/fraud/abuse (and/or cover-up thereof) during the course of your military duty, and decide to blow the whistle on that
wrongdoing. Warning: be prepared for retaliation According to accounts now arriving at the web site of verpa.org, certain
military officials would have no compunction about requiring you to undergo a psychiatric exam, whereby the preordained results
can get you administratively dismissed from service. That such an abuse of publicly funded mental-health resources can occur
on American soil is bad enough, but the felony gets compounded whenever any servicemember falls prey to it, for that victim
has no legal right to sue its perpetrators for damages. If you (or someone you know) have been victimized by (or have witnessed)
this psychiatric warfare against the bearer of bad news, now's the time to -- well -- blow the whistle on the practice. The
more of you who decide to come forward with your evidence, the better such veterans groups as VERPA can help bring about reform.
Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net.
F. Blow the Whistle on Commanders' Ad-censorship!
If
you (or someone you know) have experienced (and/or witnessed)official censoring of any public-interest ad submitted to this
(or to any other) military newspaper, you now have a formal opportunity to help challenge that action. Your submitted evidence
could lead to restoring full, unfettered, global access to this public forum called the classified-ads section. Accordingly,
your whistleblower revelations will be shared discreetly with one or more specialists in First Amendment jurisprudence. Contact:
Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net; snail-mail: 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302.
G.
Resist the Government's Drafty Spin!
In a year or so, the "politics of conscription" will reach denouement upon the
military stage of World War 2.5 (aka "United States v. Iraqnam, Iranslam, et al."). If you (or someone you know) face being
drafted into this war, you have little time to assess and counter the official spin on this prospect. Keep watching this ad
space for related developments and for opportunities to add your voice of reason and dissent. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at
(703) 931-3341; e-mail: overtci@cavtel.net
Covert/Clandestine Operations10-30-04 Covert Operations, as mentioned in Larry O'Daniel's
fine article on the Wilson/Plame Affair, below, are designed never, ever, ever to see or meet the light of day. Clandestine
Operations are "temporary" secrets, to prevent the opposition from knowing who is coming from where, and by what means for
a given purpose: The Mission! Now, an example of a Clandestine Operation would be a Special Op's unit parachuting into
a 'denied' area for the purpose of destroying a dam, hydroelectric power station, a military barracks facility or ammunition
storage facility, for instance. The reception committee, (unless the force is going in 'blind') may be a local priest
who has recruited trusted indigenous folks through a cut-out to protect his own identity, to assist the force by means of
guides or transportation or additional security to enhance their mission. The Covert side of this operation is the
identity of the local priest who may have been in place for an extended period of time and whose existence is above and beyond
suspicion. This asset is not a 'one time' character who is technically expendable. His value for a number of other long range
plans is paramount in the secrecy of his existence and his Covert nature. The means by which the priest is contacted
would be highly compartmentalized to insure secure communications to initiate the means necessary to assist the force, in
this case the Special Op's team. Great care is taken NOT to compromise the existence of this covert asset. This is the sources
and methods we hear so little about and the true reason for all the secrecy of the Plans side of the Agency and it's assets. Once
the team arrives and maneuvers to the area of concern and the mission is accomplished, that portion of the Clandestine activity
is no longer secret due to the obvious fact that a target has been destroyed or a person assassinated. There may be a secondary
mission of a highly sensitive nature involved in this activity such as emplacing a nuclear device at a different location
for later detonation while this operation is actually underway as a diversion. There may be missions within a mission
tightly held and known only to a few of the participants. This is where skullduggery comes home to roost but that is another
matter. Suffice to say, there are inherent dangers to these Covert/Clandestine activities. Bottom line, Covert activity
is designed to enhance plausible deniability whereas Clandestine activity is temporarily "sensitive" information which can
hardly be denied once completed. Infiltrating by submarine and swimming to shore is a Clandestine activity. Any assistance
in the accomplishment of the mission may very well be Covert oriented. The activity of those engaged in this type of operation,
regardless of its nature or sensitivity, is Clandestine. So, you can see from the information we already know about
Valerie Plame, her so called "outing" as a Covert agent is highly improbably due to her blatant exposure in public circles
BEFORE this incident, and her obvious desk job at Langley as an analyst, which would certainly not enhance your practical
"covert" type of activity. The brouhaha over this political "snipe" is BS and relies on the ignorance of the masses, and most
of the Intelligence Community as well! The differences between Covert and Clandestine WAS one of the earliest Intelligence
classes I had as a young trooper in Special Forces. Of course, at the time, our instructors were CIA and WWII veterans of
OSS. What you have today is a whole different breed of cat and that's why there is mass confusion in this matter. Of
course, those in the know are not about to straighten out the media on this issue for they are laughing all the way to the
bank on this one! And that is why Larry's article is so important. That's all the nickel knowledge I have for this
Saturday..... Bests, John http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/23.html
Vote Fraud- Stolen Election11-15-04 http://www.swans.com/library/art10/elib021.htmlGentlemen, Eli Beckerman's article above on "Implications Of A Stolen Election" strikes a chord of disdain
felt by myself and many of my collegues. It is a matter of great concern to most of us that the record turnout of voters in
Ohio, Massachusettes and other bastions of Democratic strongholds would succumb to such previously unknown numbers of votes
for the 'election' of the current administration without question or public clamor. If we observe more votes than voters,
should we simply smile and say, "Vote, and vote often?" How can the votes always add up to 100% of the electorate when so
many votes have been rejected for one reason or another, unmailed absentee ballots, or simply not counted? Incomprehensible,
if not impossible, some would say. Others, like Mr. Beckerman, came to the immediate and justifiable conclusion that our system
of vote 'counting' leaves no doubt that fraud, manipulation, coercion, intimidation and felonious larceny has run amok throughout
the "land of the free and the home of the brave". Strangely enough, there are laws and rules on the books that deal with voter
fraud, but only on the level of the voter, not those running the voting system and more specifically the counting of votes.
Those who may be unfortunate enough to be in the heretofore unknown territory of vote manipulation would be immune from prosecution
as there are no laws to violate. What few laws exist with respect to the voter are at the State level. Is it just a coincidence
that those in power continuously shun any attempt to place comprehensive laws on the books requiring those charged with the
responsibility to conduct vote counting to operate within specific guidelines? Is it just a coincidence that three critical
hours of vote tabulation in Ohio are missing from the most powerful computer in the State which was run by a civilian contractor
from Texas without supervision of a neutral observer or media representative? The stirring of the honey-bucket of "truth
and lies" usually allows the stench of fraud to engulf those with only the average sense of smell. In this instance,
stirring is not necessary as the putrid odor of egregious strong arm tactics has emersed itself into the authority of the
Constitution and blocked the sweet fragrance to our sense of normalcy. Did not Stalin utter the words; "It is not who votes
that counts, but rather who counts the votes"? The 'voting' of 2004 joins the other travesties of justice accepted
and condoned by our electorate and elected. The status quo of our so called election system and our system of justice have
become corrupt without recourse. But why should we be surprised when the soon to be ex-Attorney General has refused for the
past three years to address the crimes of treason in wartime and conspiracy to obstruct justice in a capital murder case to
cover-up the treason? It is duly noted that thousands of US Attorney's had been dispatched to 'observe' the voting procedures
in various States, but to what avail? The passive reaction to those who ran for the Democratic Ticket is incomprehensible
to those of us who expected at least cries of "Foul!" and "Fraud!" Was the promise of "every vote will be counted" just part
of the ruse? The silence has created a vacuum resulting in this preordained exercise to become a charade. Is that not what
has occurred here; the American Public quietly accepting the fraud of the voting machanism? No public clamor. No hue
and cry. The corruption of our voting hood-wink amidst the ongoing treason resulting in preemptive attacks on sovereign nation's
justified by fabricated "intelligence" provided by those who served at the pleasure of the president only now to be forced
from office in the Intelligence Community brings the 'plan' full circle. Plausible deniability rears its ugly head once more.
Let's rid ourselves of those disgruntled leadership positions of CIA and State Department officials who are the silent 'fall
guys' whose untimely exposure of the fraud of the Iraqi War will be met with admonitions of sour grapes to late whistle blowers.
Credibility be damned! Their 'disloyalty' to Bush, albeit in the secret, compartmented channels, in providing immediate questions
of concern over the legitimacy of the processed 'intelligence' offered by those sources with highly questionable motives has
ultimately resulted in their removal from career positions of responsibility. Those in the know are dangerous to the exposure
of corruption and fraudulent acts resulting in treason, the usurping of the Constitution and the virtual annihilation of the
possibility for Congressional Restraint of unbridled preemptive acts of war. This proves the point: "It is dangerous to be
right when your government is wrong" --Voltaire. Roll over, America. You have just taken it in the shorts. And now
that the music has ended, the blood baths have begun and the public clamor has been stiffled. These are times reminiscent
of the shades of Europe, 1933, when those who dared to question the absolutely obvious facts that a country was going to hell
in a handbag of illusions, skullduggery and out right fraud were met with the original 'Patriot Act'. Once again, those
who have raised the voices of concern over the War in Iraq and the so called 'election' will be shouted down as we were during
and after the War in Vietnam: "Forget about it! It's over. Get over it! That's old news! Stay in the middle of the road! Get
on the team!" It wasn't until more than twenty years later that the truth about the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was exposed.
Had that information been made available via such a system as the Internet back then, certainly the rally would have been
effective against the advance to the conflict in South East Asia. Our Country right or wrong? Is our arrogance dangerous?
Who's to challenge us, the only Super Power? Only ourselves. Otherwise, we are witness to the erosion of our
alleged positon as leader of the "Free World", the glue that brings the cohesiveness to nations of truth, the demise of the
bastion of world democracy and the fearsome and unbridled evolution of the aggressor nation. The following is a reality
check from the remarks of former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, acting as lead prosecutor before the Nuremberg International
War Crimes Tribunal in 1946: "WE MUST NEVER FORGET THAT THE RECORD ON WHICH WE JUDGE THESE DEFENDANTS TODAY IS THE
RECORD ON WHICH HISTORY WILL JUDGE US TOMORROW." Dare we face the music and challenge the wolves of war who would rid
us of our Rights? Or will we dance as a nation of sheep and follow this Judas Goat to the slaughter house of the tyrant? God
Bless America might very well evolve into May God Forgive America. It was easy to say "No!" before the war but now
it requires moral courage to have the people speak out against the blatant and unrelenting effects of the so called Patriot
Act I. The Ammendment to the precancerous effects of Patriot Act I is Patriot Act II. Both are virtual copies of the "Reichstagsbrandverordnung",
followed by the "Ermächtigungsgesetz"; two connected Enabling Laws of Hitler's attempt to thwart all previous Rights and Privileges
of the German people which ultimately created the requirement of neighbor spying on neighbor for the State and ultimately
voided the Weimarer Verfassung (Constitution). The fear factor of terrorism and Communism was drilled into the population
with the expected results. Can anyone say, déjà vu? http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jobrien/reference/ob60.htmlThe creation and passage of the above law and the Patriot Act I was voted into law without those voting having hardly
read the document, much less debate it due to time constraints. The time frame of the passage of the Enabling Law in Germany
in 1933 after the Reichstagsbrand (Fire) equates to the time frame of the passage of the Patriot Act I after 9/11. This is
no coincidence because the time necessary for the compilation of the Patriot Act required it to be written well before 9/11.
The script must have been written before hand and adjusted to the final version passed within 6 weeks, on October 24, 2001. http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.htmlYou may refer to the following draft of Patriot Act II, below, for comparison to the Enabling Laws above. http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/patriot2-hi.pdfWho should know better of the evolution of these laws than George Bush? Grandfather Prescott Bush and George Herbert
Walker supported Hitler during the period when the Enabling Laws were quickly pushed though the parliamentary process in 1933.
It worked once, why not again? (--> Trading With The Enemy Act, http://www.lpdallas.org/features/draheim/dr991216.htm, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100474,00.html) This application for the removal of Civil Rights and the eradication of the Constitution of Germany worked so well,
it has been duplicated by the passing of the Patriot Act. Even the title of this effort to erode the Constitution smacks of
obvious propaganda as there is nothing patriotic in it's concept nor it's intended purpose. What lurks within the framework
of this Act is unmitigated treachery. Approval of Patriot Act II would disallow the questioning of voting irregularities,
the eradication of the Posse Comitatus Act http://www.dojgov.net/posse_comitatus_act.htm, the enactment of Marshall Law and the end to life and freedom as we know it. We would become the land of the enslaved, unable
to question authority of any kind and at the mercy of those enforcing the will of a tyrant. The jackbooted thugs of our worst
dreams would become a reality like Waco and Ruby Ridge and our Constitution moot, a relic of the past, a memory to be eradicated
and eventually stamped out of existence thereby allowing one party rule similar to the Nazi system. The removal of
Civil Liberties and other inalienable rights makes a mockery of our Constitution which would read more like the rules in George
Orwell's Animal Farm. Additionally, the new enaction and interpretation of the laws of justice and their application in dealing
with so-called 'tribunals' as an instrument in dealing with terrorism would further erode the legitimacy of all courts. Orwell
would be so proud. Mr. Beckerman writes of the necessity to rebuild America. Certainly we can do that, but only after
we recognize the erroneously contrived conditions mentioned above and remedy them by necessary means. Regards, John
McCarthy Also worthy of reading: Ohio Vote Fraud: More Bush "Voters" Than Residents http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/index.cfmEvidence of Electoral Fraud in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election: A Reading List http://www.opednews.com/keefer_111504_readings.htm
Not So Subtle Terror
11-18-04 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2483This is a perfect example of the intelligence communities solution to current problems; Black Terror--under Covert
Conditions--to create an atmosphere of unbridled hatred and blame against an element with no responsibility for the senseless
murder of a woman who spoke the language, married an Iraqi, assisted tens of thousands of people who otherwise would not have
survived and for what? Propaganda. This is an act reminiscent of similar atrocities undertaken during the Vietnam War for
political purpose. Blame this atrocious act on innocent parties for nefarious reasons. All this despite unanimous cries from
all insurgent elements in Fallujah demanding her release? This is "intelligence"? Hardly, this is but another war crime, disguised
as 'terror', 'assasination' and 'war is hell'. The pattern for this type of behavior is buried in the annals of the records
of those currently in power in Iraq AND the US. Is it not obvious what has happened here or do so many wish to bury their
heads in the sands of ignorance, again? "My country would never do such a thing". HA! Now it makes sense why such issues
are cloaked with the classification of 'top secret', never to see the light of day, never to be 'down graded' which would
allow historians to view the hypocricy of the 'intelligence community' committing crimes against humanity for the purpose
of 'just win, baby' and worse. So, where are the WMD anyway? Oh, I just remembered, the OIL is the WMD! John
Examine THIS!
(response to The Military's Psychiatric Attack Against Whistleblowers, Dissidents,
et al. By Larry W. Bryant)
11-23-04
LW, Shades of Leavenworth, mon ami. During August of 1968, after exercising
my so called Rights of not working in any capacity not commensurate with my rank; cook, decal printing, woodworking, and resorting
to reading anything I could get my hands on from the limited library seclection at the USDB, a Sergeant Blue of the Psychiatric
Section came by my domicile to quietly inform me that a discussion was then underway by the staff psychiartrists whose options
included placing me into a straight jacket, medicating me with a substance strong enough to keep me asleep until I could be
transfered to Fitzimmons Army Hospital in Denver, Colorado, for mind regression treatment and, if that was unsuccessful, a
frontal labotomy, thus rendering me incompetent to speak of the highly classified activities (which later turned out to be
treasonous) resulting in my incarceration to begin with.
I notified my Congressman, John Rhodes of Arizona, who, in
turn, notified Secretary of the Army Stanley Resor, which halted this hideous option.
Sgt Blue stated that the major
reason for this option was because of my refusal to be rehabilitated, non cooperation with the staff in his office (who were
not cleared for the information they wanted to discuss) and complaints of being forced to wear other inmates underware. Oh,
my. How dare I complain!
Even though I maintained my rank, pay and allowences and continued to serve as a commissioned
officer in the United States Army, I was constantly reminded I was a "prisoner" and therefore of such a status that I had
no Rights what so ever.
All this was taking place while attorney F. Lee Bailey, with a bevy of reporters and cameramen,
were refused entrance to the military penitentiary and access to me because he was not my attorney of record. All this while
another attorney was undergoing a six month back ground check to determine if he was cleared for access to the so called sensitive
information contained in my trial record. All this precluded my appeals from being heard as I had no attorney of my choice
for this process; limbo.
When I conveyed this information to my military attorney by phone from the 'secure' phone
booth in the JAG office in Leavenworth, the tape recorder malfunctioned, feedback came over the line which promptly went dead.
So much for attorney client protection.
What a lovely bunch of coconuts!
Bests, John
JFK1-12-05 Thanks, Justin Lots of my opinions are based on the following source.
Ironically, I was arrested four years and one day after JFK was assassinated. I had been on in the Alps on the German Austrian
border emplacing a clandestine radio system when JFK was murdered in Dallas. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/ST.html100,000 copies of this book, now a free download, were removed from the bookstore shelves across this country, the
land of the free and home of the brave. Please take the time to peruse this info. It is the bible on such matters.
Prouty, the author, passed away two years ago. A tremendous loss. Thanks for you kind words. John
CIA
1-12-2005
John - When you were in Cherry, did the Agency tell you that if captured,
with your documentation, you were an illegal combatant, not entitled to Geneva Protections? Larry
No, I was so compartmentalized
from the agency and the Embassy, I was not allowed in those areas. They were very extensive on their self protection for a
rogue operation. Adams served as the cut-out. He only went there in civvies. We were not even allowed to go to B-57 except
in emergency cases. They did not communicate shit to us. Deniability!!!!!! Just gave us Embassy ID and new names. Terrific!
I guess that's what you do when you run a rogue operation, eh? Lessons learned. And remember, we were forbidden to openly
associate with ANY US military, much less SF, in Vietnam. We had an emergency radio at the safe house just a mile outside
ton son nhut. But no, no instructions what so ever. Our cover of being a DOD field evaluation team was supposed to suffice.
Ha! As soon as they threatened to sodomize me ala Abu Ghraib, I guess I would have told them my name, rank, serial number
and location of my unit. Screw them!
Bests, John
1-12-2005
Thanks -- FYI - Cherry is about to
be discussed again - this time outside of DOJ and will go to the highest levels of government I can get it to. However, this
time, it will be discussed in terms of why DOD should take over paramilitary ops from CIA. I have every reason to believe
it will get attention that it did not before because of certain recent activities I have been involved in that I can prove
I was involved in - even though I am not government connected. Cherry will be discussed, not as we did before, as part of
your case directly, but as part of why CIA has to be taken out of the field because they ran roge operations, hid rogue operations,
and still hide rogue operations - and Cherry is proof of that. Take care - Larry (DOJ will eventually become aware of it because
of the nature of the project - and it will be mentioned that DOJ did nothing to help the situation (ala our letter to Ashcroft
and followup)
1-12-2005
It should be pointed out that the CIA, in it's zeal to protect those with Treason in
Wartime hanging over their heads, resorted to conspiring to obstruct justice in a capital murder case to cover the treason!
No wonder the DOD directive for automatic downgrading of the top secret record of trial was ruled "not in effect" How quaint.
Good luck with you efforts, Larry.
Bests, John
Treason In Wartimein response to an article "No peace on Earth during unjust war" December
24, 2004, BY ANDREW GREELEY Greetings Father Greeley and a Merry Christmas to you. Following are URL's containing
once top secret documents and other information declassified by the State Department in 2000, much to the chagrin of the CIA.
Now we know why; treason in wartime. These documents are important in that they show a pattern of behavior on the part
of the intelligence community and those who control them for fabricating information to justify preemptive wars on sovereign
nations for nefarious reasons. We have become the aggressor nation. It is no more glaring than in the arrogance for continued
war in Iraq. Recently, Gary Webb took his own life in utter frustration for what his industry did to him. That is the
media. Gary had written DARK ALLIANCE for the San Jose Mercury News re the cocaine smuggling by the CIA to subvert the will
of Congress that the Nicaraguan conflict NOT be monetarily supported by the United States. Gary paid a bitter price. Even
in death he was vilified by the press for exposing the CIA, crossing that line, showing that moral courage to expose the black
hand of hypocrites who operate outside our Constitution and against our laws to subvert the will of the people. Why
not take back our country, our Constitution, and rid ourselves of this growing scourge? Are we not obligated to remove such
a cancer and restore democracy? Or are we truly living George Orwell's Animal Farm? Are we that nation of sheep following
the Judas Goat (My Pet Goat) to the slaughter house of tyranny? When we will have had enough of rape and torture in
the prisons of Iraq, perpetrated by Americans? When will we no longer hear the screams at Abu Ghraib of those mothers forced
to watch their sons being sodomized by Americans? How many CIA were dressed in military uniforms in charge of the torture
at these prisons throughout the world? This is the modus operandi from the Vietnam War, as you will see below. Sources and
methods be damned! And is it any wonder that NONE of this documented evidence has seen the light of day in the US media?
Is it any wonder that all this damning information falls on deaf ears and blind editors? Egregious you say? Read on. Peruse
these documents and see the patterns emerge which continue to this very day. Witness the blatant disregard for Presidential
Directives issued during National Security Council meetings resulting in chaos and mayhem. See the unanswered letters to Senators
on the Intelligence Committee and the letters to the Attorney General facing the same fate. Is there a greater crime
than treason in wartime? Is is any wonder that the media is complacent with the will of the government instead of it's watchdog?
Does this not smack of the ruse of the Gulf of Tonkin incident? We have broken all of the rulings handed down at the
International Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. Former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson became the Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg
and uttered these words in 1946 while seeking the death penalty for those defendants. "The standards by by which we judge
these defendants today will be the standards by which we shall be judged tomorrow". Hypocrisy has come home to roost and it's
feathers are soaked with blood and oil from Iraq. See the pattern emerge: http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.htmlhttp://www.geocities.com/larryjodanie/17.htmlhttp://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/JohnMcCarthy.htmhttp://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/21.htmlhttp://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/22.htmlhttp://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/23.htmlAnd if this is not enough, take a few moments to view the pages of this banned book, yes banned from the bookstore
shelves across this country, the land of the free and home of the brave. The Secret Team, the CIA and it's allies in control
of the united states and the world. 100,000 copies of this book have been confiscated. The CIA cannot stand the written word.
Educate yourself! It is now available for FREE download at the following site: http://www.ratical.com/ratville/JFK/ST/ST.htmlThank God for the Internet. Regards, John McCarthy President and Chairman of The Board of VERPA Veterans
Equal Rights Protection Advocacy
Rage Report
Re: Spy chief says 200,000 fighters in Iraq
January 3, 2005
Unfortunately,
those 'part timers' are the nucleus for 'guerrilla warfare', the Resistance's support. I don't think it will be advantageous
to count their numbers in the hundreds of thousands. I do believe we will be facing support in the millions. This in itself
will lead to civil war exponentially greater than that witnessed in Serbo/Croatia or South East Asia combined.
Damn,
we are good!
Sometimes it is quite dangerous and foolish to believe one's own propaganda re the opposition's potential.
One
day in 1966, a reinforced company of paratroopers from the 101st Airborne Division were called off of a mountain top in Vietnam.
As they walked to the bottom of the valley at sling arms and eating breakfast of C Rations out of cans, they walked into an
ambush.
I was in the recovery team that was allocated to recover the remains of 180 dead Americans.
The two
villages in the valley had been evacuated. The eyes and ears of the US had been removed.....
And the complicity and
arrogance of those in leadership positions got all killed. It happened more than once.
So lets not allow the figures
spewed out by those with rose colored glasses to create false security for those Oscillating Richards twisting in the wind......definition
by request on the meaning of 'OR'.
Sometimes, "Intelligence" can be produced by certifiable idiots whose deductions
can not and will not be questioned.
And now in Iraq we have lost 1400+ KIA (if you believe the numbers posted by the
Pentagon)--and 10,000 wounded-- but those are pithy numbers for the tens of thousands yet to die and the hundreds of thousands
yet to be wounded, on our side.....there are virtually millions ready to follow the dictates of the Koran---"Behead all Invaders
and non-believers".
We have yet to observe the 'meaning' of Resistance, née insurrectionists, terrorists, bandits,
and dissidents!
Wake up! And smell the coffee.....has the tsumani taken Iraq out of the news?
Has Electromagnetic
Weaponry, capable of actuating earthquakes, not been available since 1990?
Are we getting used to casualty rates in
the hundreds of thousands?
All due respect to Mr. Bruce Hoffman, quoted above, who works for the RAND Corporation,
but that outfit is the old Research and Development CIA think tank HQ in Santa Monica, CA. He must have been a great "advisor"
to be now pontificating from my neighborhod in Sunny California. Take that for what it's worth.
Bests, John
Homeless and Jobless Vets
1-14-2005
Sir, Now that we are upset with the treatment
of our service members and veterans, we take a closer look at information re a COMMONDREAMS article from Jan 10, 05.
Men
and Women in service have our support regardless. It's the poor souls lucky enough to have been discarded or lucky enough
to still be alive, but limping or blind or crazy who are now jobless, homeless and without the support of the VA who can not
or will not demand funds for these unsung hero's who feel nothing but undeserved shame because they can't cope after carrying
uncle Sam's guns off to war for nothing!
Nothing worse than walking down the street, alone, and looking for a job
and a place to sleep, jumping at cars backfiring, looking over one's shoulder by instinct, fearfull of going in or out of
crowds. Man, this sucks. Where's the drugs? So, you settle for booze and then who wants to interview you for even menial labor?
How utterly devastating and no one cares.....that's what hurts. You've given your innocence for an uncaring nation who CLAIMS
to be indebted for you service and yet the reality of situation is bleak. And bleaker.
Well, if we are going to spend
another 15-20 Billion more THIS MONTH on IRAQI propaganda crappola, where is just 10 % of that amount to care for the lost
souls who made up the numbers of 150,000 men and women in combat or harms way in Iraq over the past 18 months plus? Priorities?
You want to talk priorities!!!!!
To top it all off, a State Department spokesperson said in a televised news conference
on Jan 13, 2005, that all US military would be out of Iraq by the end of 2005!!!! That statement flies in the face of the
VA saying we can expect several more years of deployments to Iraq/Afghanistan.
Lets get on the same page, fellas.
Who
painted this scenario anyway?
Bests, John McCarthy President and Chairman of The Board of VERPA Veterans
Equal Rights Protection Advocacy
The New York Times- Inspector General Rebukes FBI Over Espionage1-15-2005 http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/15/national/ 15translate.html?oref=login&thLW, Should we not send an FOIA request/inquiry to the FBI Inspector General re Ashcrofts refusal to initiate an
investigation on the charges of treason and obstruction of justice in a capital murder case? If they have the temerity
to investigate and rebuke their own for screwing up the Sibel Edmonds case re espionage, why should they not have the same
zeal for looking into real possibility of espionage and sedition in the treason matter involving the NSC/CIA/State Department?
Would not the motive for treason not be accompanied by the initiative for the treason in the first instance, espionage? We
know how high the latest espionage exposes have effected the CIA and FBI? How far back does it go and is it still being
perpetrated by those in similar positions of responsibility today? Are we that gullible not to even ask? Even the Blond
Ghost, Ted Shakley, as CIA Station Chief in Saigon, is suspect for his actions and statements. Too bad his is toes up. But
this is rich, Shakley working for the Soviets all this time.....and holding positions as Station Chief in Miami for the Mongoose
Operation, Laos and then Saigon. And he even showed up at my trial! Bests, John
|