Scientific Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie
published on February 14 2006
NEDERLANDSE VERSIE HIER
13 februari 2006
Pretty soon after the events of 9/11, there where people who raised serious questions about the official story of 9/11.
Now, four and a half years later, the evidence that this story is a lie, is overwhelming. Question is, what are we going to
do about it? Are we going to sit and leave it for what it is, allowing the perpetrators to continue their illegal operations?
Where do you think that would lead to? What will happen with our democracy if we allow these practices? And maybe the biggest
question that we might ask ourselves is: “Why is it that we still allow criminals to lead our country and more and more
determine our lifes?” People of this world, please think about what you allow this world to become if you allow the
present course of actions taken by leaders who seek nothing else but power and control over others and eventually total world
Some may still think that the official story is true, because they simply cannot believe that our leaders would be capable
of doing such terrible crimes against their people. Well, if you are one of those who live in such emotional fields that you
simply cannot bear the truth that your leaders would be capable of doing these things despite the scientific evidence that
they are, then please don’t read this any further, for you wouldn’t accept any of this anyway. Emotions can and
do shut down one’s ability to think clearly and to examine the facts with a clear mind. Our leaders and indeed our corporate
networks know this and use it to their advantage to gain control over you. Look what has happened since 9/11, the Patriot
Act, the Department of Homeland Security, Afghanistan, Iraq, the American government spying on its own people, and even the
Constitution being questioned! Are you really prepared to give up your freedom in order to be protected from so called “terrorism”?
Is our country really any safer than it was before 9/11? Face it people, YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO BY YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT.
Apart from the wild stories that flow over the internet and the claims by our government that these are all conspiracy
theories, there certainly is scientific evidence provided by scientists and students who conducted their own research and
have proven beyond doubt that the official story of what happened on 9/11 is a lie. I will provide some very important facts
that will tell us an entirely different story when viewed from the laws of physics and the laws of nature as we know them.
What I will show you here comes from the documentary “9/11 Eyewitness” and in case you aren’t able to get that documentary yourself, which you should really try, you can read the evidence
presented in this article.
First of all, forget about all the so called “evidence” provided by the government that terrorists were behind
the attacks. All the information being presented can be easily faked by all the sophisticated means that the security and
other government agencies have to their disposal. Evidence can be and indeed has been manufactured in many cases in order
to gain what is desired, not just in the case of 9/11. That is no secret and not new. For example, the so called phone calls
that beloved ones had received from their relatives and friends. It has scientifically been proven that these calls could
not have been made from airplanes that flew at 32000 feet as flight 93 did. The signal simply wouldn’t be strong enough.
This has been tested and confirmed!
But what about the collapses of the buidlings? Admittedly, at the time of the events it was all so horrible that you cannot
blame anyone for not having a clear mind as to what was really happening. However, the pictures and footages and recordings
of the events are still there and now we may have a clearer perception of what exactly happened at the moment that these WTC
buildings collapsed. There are at least three things which are totally inconsistent with the laws of nature and physics:
- A steel-framed building cannot collapse after being exposed to 60 minutes of open fire.
- Buildings that collapse meet resistence from their own material and therefore cannot collapse in freefall as both WTC
towers and WTC building 7 did.
- Pyroclastic flows, which were evident as each building collapsed, only occur in cases of high explosive energies, as with
volcanic eruptions and controlled demolitions.
Defenders of the official explanation that the jetliner crashes and fires were responsible for the total destruction of
the three WTC buildings have been unable to cite even a single example of the total collapse of a high-rise steel-framed building
from any cause other than controlled demolition. Consequently they have cited collapse incidents that do not even remotely
resemble the cases of the World Trade Center skyscrapers.
Bear in mind that the Richter Scale is logarithmic, and that a difference of 0.1 means a logarithmic increase of a factor
of 10 and a seismic increase of roughly 30 times. Look at the magnitudes that were recorded and at the amount of TNT that
is required to produce them:
click on each image for enlarged view
Why is there so much difference in seismic energy caused by the collapse of the south tower (2.1) and the north tower (2.3)?
Both towers were of similar material and construction. Let's see what the law of conservation of energy tells us:
|click on image to enlarge
According to this physical law, the towers should have collapsed in roughly the same time and with the same seismic energy
being released, however, as we have seen, this is not the case! So what caused the difference? These matters have never been
discussed in public nor have they been presented by the corporate networks.
Signs of Explosions
Then there is the ejection of concrete and steel as the towers collapsed. In a normal case, if the top had weakened sufficiantly
because of the impact of a plane, it would have come down and fallen into the street instead of the building imploding on
itself. See what Newton’s 1st law, the Law of Inertia, says about an object in motion: Every object in a state
of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. Now look at
the following picture of the south tower as it started to collapse:
|click on each image to enlarge
According to Newton’s law the top of the building should have fallen into the street, but instead the whole tower
came down ejecting debris which could only have been caused by large explosions inside the building. Consider
that the towers' structural design was made of three sections that were placed on top of each other separated by reinforced
elevator floors. Each plane ended up in the upper section of each tower, so the reinforced floor directly below the impact
zone should have stopped a genuine collapse forcing the top section to fall into the street. So as you can see, the "pancake
theory" would never have applied here, even if the structure of the building would not have been strong enough. Up to date
the designers of these towers are still convinced that they should have been able to withstand the impact of more than one
Boeing 707! The following pictures show why the building imploded on itself:
| click on each image to enlarge
The first picture shows debris being catapulted straight out, like a canon ball. The second image shows parts of the steel
frame stuck in a nearby building. These parts had not "fallen" into that building but had been catapulted by one of the many
explosions inside the towers. If you don't believe that there were explosions then please look at the following chart. It
shows to the second each heavy explosion at different floors including at the base of the south tower that occured
prior to its collapse at 9:59am:
|click on image to enlarge
These series were witnessed by many people, and at the time of the collapse there were also people who witnessed the series
of explosions on each floor as the building came down. Does that not look like controlled demolition?
The Law of Gravity
If you are still not convinced then consider this: How can a high-rise steel-framed building collapse on itself at the
speed of gravity and almost entirely on its own footprints? It has never been recorded in history and I assure you that it
never will be! Only by means of controlled demolition can such a building be brought down and implode on itself. If you would
take the original footages and compare the collapse of each WTC building, especially the collapse of building 7, to the freefall
of an object from the same altitude, you would see that all three buildings came down with nearly the speed of gravity, and
in case of building 7 even faster! How can that be? CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. Only with controlled demolition
you can create a vacuum in which a building comes down faster than the speed of gravity. The following images are also frames
from the documentary where the fall of building 7 is compared to that of an object in freefall:
| click on each image to enlarge
The left image shows building 7 collapsing. Look at the object and the time set out next to the building. The right image
shows the time that the object hits the ground, and as you can see building 7 is already down. This is not manipulated! Everyone
with a copy of the original footages recorded by multiple cameras can do the same experiment. I have run this test myself.
You can download the result here (with air resistance) and here (in vacuum), both files about 3MB.
Pyroclastic flows are a very specific and not widely understood physical phenomenon that played a prominent role in the
physical appearance of the WTC collapses. As each building collapsed the streets were filled with pyroclastic flows. What
is a pyroclastic flow? Science states that:
- Pyroclastic flows can only occur when a dense slurry of fine dust is suspended in air or (volcanic) gasses and is
concentrated in a defined area. The suspension will then act as a separate, denser fluid that remains distinct as it
moves through the less dense medium. Because of their density such flows can reach speeds of hundreds of miles an hour
and do tremendous damage, especially with the high temperatures seen in volcanic events.
- The only other example of this phenomenon takes place under water and is referred to as a turbidity current. These usually occur where the sediment-laden continental shelf drops off into the deep ocean basins, as occasional
"landslides" of sediment break off and flow downslope.
The only known exception for pyroclastic flows to occur other than in nature is when a (high-rise) building is brought
down by controlled demolition. Let's look at some pictures takes from the Hudson river:
| left: collapse of WTC7, right: comparison with eruption of Mount
| left: comparison with eruption of St. Augustino, right flow
at the Hudson river compared to Montserrat
As you can see from the pictures the pyroclastic flows at the WTC complex are very similar to those of volcanic eruptions.
So again, what brought these buildings down? And most of all, why does the government not answer these questions?
- Both towers were nearly identical and should have collapsed in roughly the same time producing roughly the same seismic
energy. Yet there is a difference of 0.2 on the Richter scale, which is roughly 1.3 tons TNT. Where did the extra energy come
- The top of the south tower did not fall as it should have according to Newton's laws, but instead the entire building
came down ejecting tons of steel. Normally this type of collapse is only observed when controlled demolition is used.
- Series of large explosions were heard and recorded at the basements of all three buildings producing large plumes of dust.
- All three buildings fell almost at freefall on their own footprints which according to the laws of physics is impossible
because of the resistence caused by air and debris. The freefall collapse of a high rise (steel framed) building can only
be accomplished by means of controlled demolition.
- All three buildings produced pyroclastic clouds upon collapse, indicating large explosions suspending fine dust into the
air. This phenomenon is known to occur only in three situations: 1. volcanic eruptions, 2. turbidity currents, 3. collapses
of buildings caused by controlled demolition
From all the evidence provided by film cameras, audio recorders, witnesses and pictures, the only conclusion we have left
is that the three buildings WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were brought down with controlled demolition. And I believe that if this attack
with the same means were conducted by real terrorists from other countries, this would have been the official government explanation!
As long as the government doesn't answer the serious questions people have, or come up with a real good and fitting explanation,
they remain suspected of having commited these acts themselves, as to the present day there is nothing that would indicate
or proof otherwise!
Copyright © 2006 Ditrianum Media Center www.ditrianum.org
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
You are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under the following
conditions: You must give the author credit, you may not use this for commercial purposes, and you may not alter, transform
or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any
of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Any other purpose of use must be granted
permission by author.
Watch the video: