THE PENTAGON ATTACK PAPERS
Seven Hours in September:
that Broke the Lie
THE TERROR CONSPIRACY
by Jim Marrs
Publication date, Sept. 6, 2006
by Barbara Honegger,
Barbara Honegger, M.S. is Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School (1995-present),
the Navy’s advanced science, technology and national security affairs university. This research, as all of Honegger’s
research and publications on September 11, are solely in her capacity as a concerned private citizen and do not imply official
endorsement. Honegger served as Special Assistant to the Assistant to the President and White House Policy Analyst (1981-83);
was the pioneering Irangate author and whistleblower on the October Surprise (October Surprise, Tudor, 1989; and Iran-Contra
expose documentary film "Cover-Up"); and was called as a researcher/witness at both the October 23, 2004, and August 27, 2005,
Los Angeles Citizens 9/11 Grand Jury hearings held at Patriotic Hall in Los Angeles, Calif. Much of the information and analysis
contained in this evidence summary was presented at the L.A. Citizens Grand Jury hearings and at the 9/11 Emergency Truth
Convergence conference held at American University in Washington, D.C. in July, 2005.
The San Francisco Chronicle commemorated the 100th anniversary of The Great Earthuake of 1906 with a series
of front-page articles headed by a single icon - a charred clock frozen at 5:12 am, the exact moment "The Big One" hit.
A century after that devastating event, the stopped clock serves as both the ultimate evidence and the symbol that "captures
Again, almost 100 years later, clocks frozen in time at the Pentagon on the morning of September 11, 2001
both "capture it all" and are the ultimate evidence that shatters the "Official Lie" of what happened that terrible morning.
Pentagon was first attacked at 9:32 am, much earlier than the 9/11 Commission and official cover story claim. (In this summary
of evidence, the more precise time of 9:31:40 am is "rounded up" for ease of reference.)
The Pentagon and mainstream
media first reported 9:43 as the time of alleged Flight 77 impact (some reports, presumably taken from official sources, were
as late as 9:48 and 9:47). Over time, the time given by officials for the claimed outside impact on the building has been
moved earlier and earlier, down to 9:37 (as of the time of this writing), but has never come close to the actual time of the
first violent event at the Pentagon - 9:32.
Clearly, if the official story that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon at 9:37 were
true, Flight 77 could not have been the source of massive damage to the west side of the building a minimum of five minutes
earlier at 9:32.
Converging Lines of Proof of a 9:32 Violent Event at the Pentagon on September 11, well before
the Official Story says anything hit the building:
Multiple standard-issue, battery-operated wall clocks on
the walls of the area of the Pentagon attacked on 9/11 -including one in the heliport just outside the west face- were stopped
between 9:31 and 9:32−1/2 by a violent event, almost certainly a bomb or bombs inside the building and/or in a truck
or construction trailer parked right outside the west face. The first Associated Press report, in fact, stated that the Pentagon
had been damaged by a "booby trapped truck." The Navy posted the stopped heliport clock on an official website and another
of the stopped clocks is in the 9/11 display at the Smithsonian Institution. These are just some of the
west section Pentagon clocks that stopped between 9:31 and 9:32−1/2 on September 11.
April Gallop, an Army employee
with a Top Secret clearance, was at her desk in the Army administrative offices in the west section of the Pentagon on 9/11,
the area of the building most heavily destroyed, when what she said sounded and felt "like a bomb" went off. "Being in the
Army with the training I had, I know what a bomb sounds and acts like, especially the aftermath, and it sounded and acted
like a bomb. There was no plane or plane parts inside the building, and no smell of jet fuel." Ms. Gallop still has the watch
she was wearing that morning, which stopped shortly after 9:30.
The FAA’s [Federal Aviation Administration] timeline
document "Executive Summary-Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis--September 11, 2001" reads: "0932: ATC (Air Traffic
Control) AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon." The time is the critical fact here,
not the claimed cause.
Denmark’s soon-to-be Foreign Minister Per Stig Moller was in a building in Washington,
D.C. on 9/11 from which he looked out, heard an explosion and saw the smoke first rise from the Pentagon. He immediately looked
at his watch, which read 9:32 am. He gave radio interviews in Denmark the next morning in which he stated that the Pentagon
had been attacked at 9:32.
On August 27, 2002, then White House Counsel and now Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales gave the Secretary of the Navy lecture at the Naval Postgraduate School in which Gonzales explicitly and
clearly states that "The Pentagon was attacked at 9:32". A tape of this segment of his talk was played at the 9/11 Emergency
Truth Convergence at American University in Washington, D.C. in July 2005, and is on the public record.
Pentagon was attacked by bomb(s) at or around 9:32 am, possibly followed by an impact from an airborne object
significantly smaller than Flight 77, a Boeing 757.
We have already seen that Army employee April Gallop,
whose watch was stopped by the violent event at the Pentagon shortly after 9:30, says that her military training and experience
led her to immediately determine the source of the initial explosion was a bomb.
I have interviewed an Army auditor
from Ft. Monmouth, New Jersey, who was on temporary duty assignment at the Pentagon before, on and after 9/11. He was in the
Army financial management spaces only minutes before the Pentagon explosion on the morning of 9/11. He had just returned to
his temporary office on the ground floor of the adjacent south side of the Pentagon by the cafeteria when he heard an explosion
and felt the building shake. Immediately afterwards, he said, hundreds of panicked Pentagon personnel ran by him down the
corridor just outside his office and out the South Entrance, yelling "Bombs!" and "A bomb went off!" The witness has requested
that his name not be used in this summary, but is willing to testify to a grand jury or independent official investigation.
Army financial management/audit area is part of, or contiguous to, the Army personnel offices, which was one of two main west
section offices heavily destroyed in the Pentagon attack, the other being the Naval Command Center. The day before 9/11, September
10, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld held a press conference at which he acknowledged that the Pentagon was "missing" -could
not account for and needed to "find"- $2.3 Trillion dollars (other reports said $2.6 Trillion). Were the auditors
who could "follow the money," and the computers whose data could help them do it, intentionally targeted? It is worth noting
that the Pentagon’s top financial officer at the time, Dov Zakheim, who also acknowledged the "missing" trillions, had
a company that specializes in aircraft remote-control technology. As remnants found in the Pentagon wreckage have been identified
as the front-hub assembly of the front compressor of a JT8D turbojet engine used in the A-3 Sky Warrior jet fighter,
and as Air Force A-3 Sky Warriors -normally piloted planes- were secretly retrofitted to be remote-controlled drones and fitted
with missiles in a highly compartmented operation at an airport near Ft. Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport in Colorado in
the months before 9/11, the question further arises as to whether Pentagon auditors and their computerized
data were intentionally targeted on 9/11.
The Ft. Monmouth Army auditor and his two colleagues were also eyewitnesses
to multiple teams of bomb-sniffing dogs and their K-9 handlers in camouflage uniform at the Pentagon metro station just outside
the Pentagon at approximately 7:30 am on 9/11. He said that K-9 bomb squads had not been at the Pentagon metro stop before
9/11, or since, but only that day. Since K-9 dog squads don’t usually search for airliners, but bombs, a bomb attack
was clearly anticipated. Ms. Gallop said she also saw the bomb sniffing K-9 teams that morning, from the top of the Pentagon
metro stop looking down.
Survivor eyewitnesses from inside the west section of the Pentagon reported that the blast
caused its windows first to expand outwards, and then inwards.
said they smelled cordite after the initial explosion at the Pentagon, an explosive which has a distinct and very different
smell from that of burning jet fuel. And as we have already noted, Ms. Gallop said there was no smell
of jet fuel inside the most damaged section of the building shortly after the first violent event that stopped her watch there
shortly after 9:30.
Even Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld told Sam Donaldson in an ABC News interview shortly
after 9/11 that he first thought a bomb had gone off in the building. Donaldson: "What did you think it was?" Rumsfeld: "A
bomb? I had no idea..."
It is important to note that bomb explosion(s) at 9:32 am on the ground floor of the west
section of the Pentagon are not inconsistent with there having also been a later, or even near-simultaneous,
impact by some airborne object -- a piloted plane, unmanned drone, or missile -- into the same or nearby section of the building,
which may have been the cause of the collapse of the west wall section approximately 20 minutes after the initial violent
event. Indeed, if a heat-seeking missile hit the building after the bomb(s) went off, the heat from the explosion(s)
would become the target for the missile. Recall that the A-3 Sky Warrior planes were retrofitted shortly before 9/11,
not only enabling them to be remotely controlled but also fitted with missiles. The round-shaped exit hole in the inner wall
of the "C" Ring is evidence that a missile or a piloted or pilot-less remote-controlled plane significantly smaller than Flight
77 also struck the building subsequent to bombs going off and penetrated the inside of the third ring, as
bomb detonations would not have resulted in such a near-symmetrical round-shaped opening.
I have interviewed the then
Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations on 9/11, Robert Andrews -the top civilian official in charge
of special operations under Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld- a former Green Beret whose office was on the second floor of the
south section of the Pentagon, adjacent to the west section. While drawing the path that he took that morning on a sketch
of the Pentagon, he revealed the following:
Immediately after the second World Trade Center attack of 9:03 am, Secretary
of Defense Rumsfeld left his office on the Potomac side of the Pentagon and went (merely) across the hall on the same floor
to his Executive Support Center (ESC), which is set up for teleconferencing. There, he joined the teleconference of top government
officials run by Richard Clarke out of the White House Situation Room media room. Clarke, in his book Against All Enemies,
confirms that Rumsfeld was among the first officials on this teleconference shortly after the second WTC tower was hit. Clarke’s
account and Andrews’ confirmation of it are completely at odds with the official cover story and the 9/11 Commission,
which claim that no one could locate Secretary Rumsfeld until approximately 10:30 am when he walked into the National Military
Command Center (NMCC). The fact that Rumsfeld, the military’s top civilian official, was on Clarke’s teleconference
with the top official of the FAA, Director Jane Garvey, also puts the complete lie to the official cover story that Air Force
interceptors weren’t scrambled in time because the military and FAA "couldn’t talk each other" on 9/11. The
top-most officials of the Pentagon and FAA were talking to one another constantly on Clarke’s teleconference
from as early as 9:15. This taped Clarke teleconference is the "Butterfield tape" of 9/11. [During the 1970s Watergate scandal,
secretly-made tapes of President Nixon’s Oval Office conversations revealed by Alexander Butterfield were the "smoking
guns" which forced Nixon to resign or face certain impeachment and trial in the Senate.]
Immediately after the second
WTC tower was struck at 9:03 am, Andrews and his aide left his office and ran as fast as they could down to the Secretary
of Defense’s West section basement Counterterrorism Center (CTC), beneath the ground-level location of the
violent event in the building that morning, arriving at approximately 9:10. While he and his aide were in this west side basement
CTC, a violent event caused the ceiling tiles to fall off the ceiling and smoke to pour into the room. Andrews immediately
looked at his watch, which read approximately 9:35 am but which was set fast to ensure timely arrival at meetings, so the
actual time was closer to 9:32. He and his aide then immediately evacuated the CTC with the goal of joining Rumsfeld in his
Executive Support Center (ESC) across the hall from Rumsfeld’s main office. He said that Rumsfeld was already on the
White House teleconference when they arrived. En route to Rumsfeld’s ESC, Andrews said when he and his aide entered
the corridor on the inside ring of the west section, "we had to walk over dead bodies" to get to the inner courtyard.
(Note: This is two rings further in towards the center from the inner most hole made by whatever allegedly
impacted the Pentagon that morning.)
Once in the inner courtyard, Andrews and his aide ran as fast as they could to
Rumsfeld’s Executive Support Center, where he joined Rumsfeld as his special operations/counterterrorism adviser during
Clarke’s White House teleconference. Andrews also said that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld spoke with President Bush
while in the Pentagon Executive Support Center. Whether this was via the teleconference or by phone or other means was not
stated. The fact that Rumsfeld personally communicated with Bush on 9/11 while Rumsfeld was in his Pentagon ESC was published
on an official DoD web site.
WTC janitor William "Willy" Rodriguez, the last non-emergency
response person to leave the WTC alive on 9/11, has testified that he was in the first basement level of the WTC
when an immense explosion went off below him in the yet-deeper subbasement level(s) of the building a few
seconds before the plane hit the tower high above. As Robert Andrews revealed that the west side basement
level of the Pentagon was damaged at approximately 9:32 am and as we know that the cause of the 9:32 Pentagon attack was not
an impact event but explosives, there are thus eye- and ear witness reports of bombs going off in both the Pentagon
and the WTC underground level(s) before both buildings were hit by anything from
As no "outside" terrorist, al Qaeda or otherwise, could have had access to either the Pentagon or the
sustained advance access needed to pre-place explosives inside the WTC, only domestic insiders could have pre-placed
the explosives in both the Pentagon and the WTC. Further, because the WTC1 deep-basement explosions(s) experienced
by Willy Rodriguez happened before the tower was hit by a plane; as any incoming plane not controlled by the same
party that triggered the sub-basement detonation(s) could have veered off from the building at the last second, ruining the
plane-impact-as-cover-story for the later building collapse; and as the sub-basement explosions were necessary for the actual
later collapse of the buildings by controlled demolition, the same domestic-US insiders had to have controlled
both the sub-basement detonations and the incoming plane(s). Thus, even if al Qaeda hijackers were on the
incoming planes, they were not in final control of the impact of the planes into the buildings, which had to have
been guaranteed by domestic/US insider controllers to ensure the sub-basement bombs didn’t go off prematurely and destroy
the plane-impact cover story. This fact is critical, as it takes jurisdiction for the mass murders at the WTC away from the
Bush Administration’s FBI, which oversees crimes committed in the air, and places it squarely with the State of New
York, as murder is a State crime and multiple/mass murders are the sum of individual State crimes. Because the controllers
of the timing of the basement level explosives had to have also been the controllers of the final approach of the planes,
and the former was clearly on the ground and not in the air, a Manhattan grand jury can suddenly pull jurisdiction for the
Bush-Cheney Reichstag Fire out of their hands.
Because the real modus operandi at the Pentagon and WTC are
so similar, it is logical to deduce that the same domestic-US terrorists were responsible for pre-placing and detonating the
bombs - both inside the WTC and inside the Pentagon. That is, a single group of US-domestic conspirators -not al Qaeda or
any other outside terrorists- must have planned both the WTC and Pentagon attacks and controlled both the approaching
planes and the inside-the-building explosions in real time on 9/11.
In addition to the already legion
evidence that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon -- i.e. the small hole in the west side of the Pentagon being not nearly
large enough for the plane’s fuselage, let alone wing width; no damage to the lawn where Flight 77 allegedly struck
and skidded before hitting the building; wrecked plane parts at the site identified as being from an A-3 Sky Warrior, a far
smaller plane than that of Flight 77, a Boeing 757; Pentagon requests to TV media on the morning of 9/11 not to take up-close
images, etc. -- there is also official evidence that Flight 77 did not hit the building:
In the Air Force’s
own account of the events of 9/11, Air War Over America, the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) general
who finally ordered interceptor jets scrambled on 9/11, although too late, Gen. Larry Arnold, revealed that he ordered one
of his jets to fly down low over the Pentagon shortly after the attack there that morning, and that this pilot reported back
that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building. This fighter jet -not Flight 77- is almost certainly the plane
seen on the Dulles airport Air Traffic Controller’s screen making a steep, high-speed 270-degree descent before disappearing
from the radar. [When a plane flies low enough to go undetected, it is said to be "under the radar."] Military pilots -like
the one sent by Gen. Arnold on 9/11 to report on the Pentagon’s damage- are trained to fly 500 feet above ground in
order to evade radar detection. In fact, when the Air Traffic Controller responsible for the plane and her colleagues watched
the extremely difficult 270-degree maneuver on her screen, they were certain that the plane whose blip they were watching
perform this extremely difficult feat was a US military aircraft, and said so at the time. It almost certainly was.
the likely reason the Pentagon has refused to lower the current official time for "Flight 77" impact, 9:37, to 9:32 am -the
actual time of the first explosions there- is that they decided to pretend the blip represented by Arnold’s surveillance
jet approaching just before 9:37 was "Flight 77." As the official cover story claims that the alleged 9:37 impact was the
only Pentagon attack that morning, yet by the time Arnold’s surveillance jet arrived on the scene the violent
event had already happened, the Pentagon cannot acknowledge the earlier 9:32 time without revealing an attack on the building
prior to the alleged impact.
It is significant that the The 9/11 Commission Report ignores the testimony
of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta to its own commission and did this only for the testimony of Secretary
Mineta. The clear reason for this blatant and targeted censorship is that Mineta’s eyewitness testimony is extremely
dangerous to the official cover story. The portion of Mineta’s testimony that is particularly dangerous is his claim
that Vice President Cheney, in charge in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) beneath the White House since
before Mineta arrived in the PEOC at 9:20, insisted to an incredulous "young man" that "the orders (given earlier by Cheney
to this same individual) still stand" when the man told Cheney that the presumed plane they had been tracking as a blip on
a screen was 50, then 30, and finally just 10 miles from Washington - orders which could only have been not to shoot
down the plane. Otherwise there would have been no reason for the agent to ask Cheney if they "still" stood, despite the plane’s
being almost upon the capital where Cheney himself was. This is critical because of the timing that can be inferred from Mineta’s
testimony: As Mineta arrived at the PEOC at 9:20 am, and as Mineta estimated the "still stand?" interaction between Cheney
and the agent happened 5 to 6 minutes after that, or about 9:25, it can be inferred based on the officially given speed of
the plane represented by the blip of 540 mph that whatever that fast- approaching blip represented, it arrived in the vicinity
of the Pentagon at approximately 9:32 - nowhere close to the original official cover story time of 9:43, or even the six-minute-earlier
time the Pentagon finally settled on for an alleged impact time of 9:37.
All of this also happened at 9:32:
- After an inexplicable delay during which they knew that both WTC towers were under attack, the Secret Service suddenly
acts as if the attacks are "real," rushing President Bush out of the library at the Florida school where he had been reading
- The firefighters are suddenly ordered out of WTC 1.
- The New York Stock Exchange is ordered closed.
- The takeover of Flight 93 begins with the stabbing of a flight attendant and one of the alleged hijackers announcing that
there is a bomb on board, picked up by flight controllers.
Other relevant interviews:
I interviewed the famous "lone taxi driver" whose cab is the only car
visible still parked on I-395 above the Pentagon lawn looking down at the west face after the other cars have left the freeway.
This taxi can be seen in overhead photos taken on the morning of 9/11 and viewable on the Internet. The driver said his was
the last car allowed onto that section of I-395 before police put up a barricade and that he decided not to immediately leave
the scene like the others "because I realized this was history and I wanted to see for myself." He stated that he saw no evidence
of a plane having impacted the building nor any visible plane pieces on the lawn at the time he arrived, which was after the
first violent event in the building, as black smoke was streaming up and to the right from inside-the-building fires. The
taxi cab driver drew a diagram of what he saw that morning while overlooking the Pentagon’s west face from I-395.
interviewed a Navy public affairs officer assigned to the Naval Command Center, one of the two major Pentagon west section
areas destroyed on 9/11, the other being the Army Financial Management/Audit area as mentioned earlier. This officer was not
in the building that morning but was quickly assigned as the deputy public affairs officer at the underground "back-up Pentagon"
location in Pennsylvania close to the Maryland border, Site R. This eyewitness Navy officer inside Site R said Deputy Secretary
of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and later Vice President Cheney were flown to the Site R underground bunker in response to Richard
Clarke’s officially declaring "Continuity of Government/Continuity of Operations" (COG/COOP) on the morning of 9/11.
This is confirmed in Clarke’s book, Against All Enemies, in which he reports that Rumsfeld chose Wolfowitz
to be the designated COG/COOP official at Site R in his stead. Perhaps significantly, Site R and Camp David are not far from
the crash site of Flight 93. Details about Site R, on and after 9/11, are also in James Bamford’s book, A Pretext
On February 4, 2004, I interviewed Air Force General Ralph Eberhart, Commander of NORAD on 9/11. To my
knowledge, Gen. Eberhart has granted no other interview since the events of September 11. Before asking questions, I gave
Gen. Eberhart copies of all the mainstream press articles published as of that date on the subject of the confusion of his
NORAD Northeast Sector (NEADS) personnel who were running NORAD’s "Vigilant Guardian/Vigilant Warrior" emergency response
war game exercises that morning. As of the date of the interview, therefore, the then head of NORAD was made aware of the
initial confusion by his own NEADS "game" players on 9/11 between incoming exercise reports and incoming reports of the actual
I first asked Gen. Eberhart if there was any connection between NORAD’s "Vigilant Guardian/Vigilant
Warrior" exercise being run on 9/11 and the plane-crashing-into-tower emergency response exercise simultaneously being held
at National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) headquarters outside Washington, D.C.[12/first cite] He replied,
"No." I was surprised at this, as a large portion of NRO personnel are from his own agency, the Air Force. I asked for reconfirmation,
to which he again said, "No." Laying the ground for the next question, I mentioned that NEADS’ "game" director Lt. Col.
Dawne Deskins had said that she was confused as to whether initial reports of the hijacked planes on the morning of 9/11 were
"real world" or "part of the game." This, I said, showed that the NORAD exercises that morning had to have been on a hijack
scenario at least similar to the actual attacks, as otherwise there would have been no grounds for confusion. After
considering this for a moment, Gen. Eberhart refused to answer any further questions and abruptly ended the interview.
addition to the already well known and officially acknowledged evidence of Bush Administration foreknowledge of the broad
outlines of the September 11 attacks -advance warnings from the intelligence agencies of as many as 11 foreign countries and
the content of the now-famous August 6, 2001 presidential daily brief (whose 10-page attachment still has not been made public),
etc.- there is strong evidence that Bush administration insiders had near perfect -if not complete- advance knowledge of both
the details and the date of the September 11 attack:
(Note: That Bush Administration insiders had advance
knowledge of the date and details of an "outside" attack is not inconsistent with these insiders having facilitated and even
orchestrated the attacks. That is, the plot behind the attacks of September 11 is similar to that of the Reichstag fire, through
which Hitler rapidly consolidated power. Like the Nazi-facilitated Reichstag fire, there was a real though highly-unlikely-to-succeed
"outside" plot about which Administration insiders gained advance intelligence. They then secretly protected and enabled this
plot to ensure that it not only succeeded, but succeeded spectacularly as the psychological operation needed to justify
the entire subsequent Bush-Cheney global and domestic agenda.)
1) Shortly after September 11, Newsweek
reported that before 9/11, the Bush Administration initiated a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Court
surveillance/tap of "up to 20" suspected al Qaeda-linked terrorists then in the US, but that then FISA Court Chief Justice
Royce Lamberth subsequently ordered the then-already-ongoing surveillance stopped. This can only mean one thing - that the
Bush Justice Dept./FBI/NSA initiated the tap before asking the FISA Court for a warrant for it, as with the now-famous
post-9/11 NSA taps initiated by the Bush administration without first applying for FISA warrants.
As "up to 20" is
a clever way of saying "19" without making the link to 9/11 explicit, the Bush Administration Justice Dept/FBI/NSA almost
certainly initiated surveillance of all 19, or close to all 19, of the soon-to-be alleged 9/11 hijackers before 9/11.
Though Judge Lamberth ordered the surveillance ended once the administration filed the formal warrant application, there is
evidence that the Bush administration ignored his order to cease the tap and continued the surveillance of the alleged 9/11
hijackers up to and including the day of 9/11.
Zacarias Moussaoui -the only person indicted by the Bush Administration
for anything even related to 9/11- has stated in court filings that both he "and my (al Qaeda) brothers" then in the US were
surveilled by the Bush administration before 9/11 and that the Bush administration knows he can prove it. How could this be
the case? If Moussaoui was one of the "up to 20" al Qaeda-linked terrorist suspects they surveilled before 9/11 without an
advance FISA warrant as reported by Newsweek, then Moussaoui was also one of the "up to 20" whose taps Judge Lamberth
ordered stopped. Moussaoui, after all, was originally named as the "20th hijacker" of the 9/11 plot. Amazingly, the FISA Act
requires that, if the FISA Court rejects a surveillance initiated before a warrant has been applied for, as in this case,
the court has to inform the "target" of the surveillance and give him the government’s stated reason for the tap in
the surveillance application. Moussaoui says that he can "prove" the Bush administration/FBI initiated surveillance on him
before 9/11 because, it can be deduced, the FISA Court itself told him so after Lamberth ordered his --and those of the other
"up to 20"-- surveillance ended.
If this is the case, it opens the very real possibility that the FISA Court likewise
informed most or all 19 of the "up to 20"alleged 9/11 hijackers before 9/11 that they were being surveilled by the Bush Administration
- and the reason for such surveillance. This also throws new light on the claims by the Pentagon’s then-secret data
mining task force, "Able Danger," to have tracked lead 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta and at least four of the other 19 hijackers
beginning in January, 2000, when Atta actually did enter the country according to Daniel Hopsicker in his book, Welcome
to Terrorland. The FBI falsely claimed, and still falsely claims, that Atta did not enter the US until the summer of
2000, six months later. The likely reason for this intentional lie about when Atta first entered the country is what Atta
is known to have done while inside the US between January and the Summer of 2000. Hopsicker reveals that, among other activities,
Atta visited Portland, Maine, in March, 2000, and perhaps even earlier. An abiding "mystery" of the official cover story is
why Atta drove to Portland, Maine on September 10, the day before 9/11, and then flew from Portland to Boston early on the
morning of September 11. The answer to this "mystery," which the FBI clearly already knows, is the link between what Atta
was doing in Portland before the administration admits he was even in the country, as well as what he was doing there
the day before 9/11 and early on the morning of 9/11. This may all have something to do with the fact that the CIA reportedly
runs secret flights out of an airport in Portland, Maine, and that "rendition" detainees have said they were flown out of
the country on special jets after first stopping at Portland’s International Jet Port.
The FBI’s top bin Laden/al Qaeda hunter until shortly before 9/11, John O’Neill, "happened" to be at the same
hotel in the same town near Tarragona, Spain in mid-July 2001 just before lead hijacker Mohamed Atta and 9/11 plot
"coordinator" Ramzi Binalshibh. Some Bush administration officials now also believe that 9/11 "mastermind" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
(KSM) met there for what the 9/11 Commission calls "the Final 9/11 Planning Meeting." This cannot be -and is not- a coincidence.
O’Neill, who was in close contact with German intelligence -recall that Atta led the "German cell" for the 9/11 attacks-
and Spanish intelligence, had clearly been alerted to the upcoming meeting and was at the hotel to surveil/tap/bug the room
where the meeting was about to be held. O’Neill and his agency, the Bush administration’s FBI, thus knew every
detail, or nearly every detail, of the planned 9/11 plot at least two months in advance.
Perhaps just as significantly,
European media reported that bin Laden was in an American hospital in Dubai incapacitated for surgery during precisely this
same mid-July, 2001, period of the Spanish "final 9/11 Planning Meeting." Reportedly, bin Laden was visited in the hospital
by the area’s then CIA station chief. The question naturally arises as to whether bin Laden was telephoned by Atta,
Binalshibh, and perhaps also KSM, or visa versa, while the latter were at the "Final 9/11 Planning Meeting" in the hotel that
O’Neill had pre-bugged. If so, then O’Neill, the FBI, and the highest levels of the Bush Administration -including
O’Neill’s then boss, Attorney General Ashcroft, who suddenly stopped flying commercial aircraft about this time-
knew not only every detail of the 9/11 plot as of that date, but almost certainly recorded all the key "outside" conspirators
plotting their "final plans" including possibly bin Laden himself, on tape - clearly another "Butterfield" tape to
be demanded by subpoena.
As noted above, on 9/11 itself the US military was conducting NORAD/Air Force emergency
response exercises on scenarios involving multiple hijacks, and the NRO was conducting an emergency response exercise on the
scenario of a plane crashing into one of the towers at its headquarters just outside Washington, D.C.
- many NRO personnel being from the Air Force and CIA. It is next to impossible for this to have been the
case unless the exercises, also referred to as war games, were intentionally scripted to mirror what had been learned
from the above-mentioned detailed advance intelligence. That is, the purpose of the war games held on 9/11 was to practice
how to defend against the very attacks that John O’Neill’s Tarragona meeting surveillance, the Pentagon’s
"Able Danger" data-mining tracking, and the FBI’s FISA-warrant-less surveillance of the "up to 20" ("19"?) suspected
al Qaeda terrorists had already revealed. You don’t practice something in a multi-million-dollar set of exercises that
you "can’t imagine." The date for the actual attacks -September 11- was then chosen to coincide with the Pentagon’s
exercises, which in turn mirrored the real attack plans (see below).
Perhaps the most burning data point to prove Bush
administration complicity in 9/11 is the fact that lead hijacker Mohamed Atta took to the mid-July "final 9/11 planning meeting"
in Spain the information that "the date has been set" (i.e. set by someone else other than Atta), and that
he, Atta, didn’t yet know it, but would "know it" in five to six weeks, or by late August, 2001.
Atta was clearly waiting to learn the date of "his own" attack. This last piece of the puzzle fell into place during the first
phase of Zacarias Moussaoui’s sentencing trial, in the 58-page transcript of 9/11"mastermind" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s
interrogation "testimony" read into the trial record by the Bush administration prosecution. In this KSM transcript, it is
revealed that bin Laden and KSM "allowed Atta to choose" both the final targets for the attacks and the attack date."
From this, therefore, we know that neither bin Laden nor "mastermind" KSM nor "coordinator" Binalshibh set the September 11
attack date. However, from what Atta said to Binalshibh -and probably also KSM and even possibly bin Laden by phone link-
at the "Final Planning Meeting" in Spain, we also know that neither did Atta. Atta was waiting to
learn the date of his "own" attack five to six weeks after the mid-July "final 9/11 planning meeting," and
that date did not come from any of his al Qaeda superiors. It must be the case then, despite KSM’s claim that
he "let" Atta choose the date, that none of the top "outside" terrorist conspirators set the date for the
September 11 attacks, including Atta.
The key and central fact of the entire 9/11 plot is that the
attack date Atta was "waiting for" was the date of the Bush administration’s planned war games, which, in a
vicious circle, were scripted to mirror the content of Atta’s attack plan gleaned via advance intelligence obtained
from O’Neill’s surveillance of the "final planning meeting" near Tarragona, the Pentagon’s "Able Danger"
tracking of Atta, and the FBI’s warrantless surveillance of Atta and other of the about-to-be alleged hijackers. Atta
was thus the sole individual to whom the date the Bush administration finally chose for its war games - 9/11- was
leaked as soon as it was selected and he bought his one-way ticket as soon as he learned it, in late August, 2001, just as
he had predicted at the "final planning meeting." The No. 1 Bush administration conspirator, therefore, is whoever gave the
administration’s own war game scenario details and date -9/11- to Mohamed Atta.
Lt. Gen. Mahmoud Ahmed, then
head of Pakistan’s military intelligence agency ISI, is a prime suspect for the middleman who laundered this No. 1 Bush
administration conspirator’s insider war game information to Atta. On the morning of 9/11 he was having breakfast with
future CIA Director Porter J. Goss and Senator Bob Graham, who co-chaired the joint House/Senate "investigation" of the 9/11
attacks, and had met with CIA Director George Tenet and with top officials at the Pentagon, about to conduct the war games,
in the few days leading up to 9/11. He is most likely the person who was told the date and details of the Pentagon’s
emergency response exercises and communicated them, directly or via an intermediary, to Atta, as Ahmed also approved wiring
$100,000 to Atta shortly before 9/11. Atta then confirmed 9/11 as the date for the war games -which was the date of the attacks-
in his now-famous NSA-intercepted call with KSM of September 10, in which he related "The Match is about to begin. Zero hour
is tomorrow." "Match" is a way of saying "exercise" or "war game." This critical September 10 intercept, by the way, was almost
certainly made without an advance FISA warrant, putting the lie to now CIA Director and then NSA Director Gen. Michael Hayden’s
patently false claim that the "first" warrantless taps were initiated in defensive response to 9/11, and thus came after
Another abiding "mystery" of September 11 is why Gen. Eberhart, the commander of NORAD on 9/11, claimed
to the 9/11 Commission that on the morning of 9/11 NORAD was conducting, among others, a preplanned "Soviet-era" emergency
response exercise in which US fighter jets were to defend against Russian nuclear bombers. After all,
the Soviet Union had ceased to exist ten years before. He didn’t say "Russian," he said "Soviet." This is very
strange until one discovers that, despite repeated official and media claims that September 11 was "completely unique" and
that the skies over America had "never before" been cleared of all commercial and private civilian aircraft, NORAD had conducted
another emergency response exercise 40 years earlier, which completely cleared the skies over the mainland US. This was on
October 14, 1961, in a war game called "Sky Shield II," which was based on a scenario of how to defend against an air attack
by Soviet bombers on New York City. The main difference between the 1961 exercise and September
11 is that the clearing of the skies was announced in advance to the public in "Sky Shield." This original Soviet-era exercise,
which included 1,800 US and 15 Canadian military planes and was billed as "the greatest exercise ever conducted by Western
air-defense forces," is mentioned in the Air Force’s own account of the events of September 11, Air War Over America.
In fact, Gen. Larry Arnold, NORAD’s commander for the continental US on 9/11 directly under Eberhart who finally ordered
interceptor jets scrambled to belatedly meet the hijack threat, made a point of including the eerily similar 1961 Air Force
war game in the book. Not only did both the 1961 and September 11 NORAD "Soviet-era" war game scenarios include attacks on
New York City; in the 1961 exercise, US military planes played the role of Soviet attack bombers. That is, the US military
pre-scripted both the defense and the "attack" by its own planes pretending to be Soviet aircraft. If Gen. Eberhart’s
testimony to the 9/11 Commission is correct, NORAD may have been conducting a "Soviet-era" exercise much like the one in 1961,
In this light, it is significant that mainstream press stories contain intriguing reports that point to the
possibility that there were two American Airlines "Flight 11s," leaving from two different gates at Boston Logan
airport within a few minutes of one another on 9/11, as well as emerging evidence of other of the hijacked 9/11 flight numbers
possibly being "twinned," or duplicated. The question thus naturally arises, were these "twin" planes
US military planes "playing" hijacked airliner "attackers," similar to the 1961 scenario except substituting commandeered
airliners for Soviet bombers? And could the 9/11 exercise have included a "trigger" event to clear the skies over the mainland
US so that a realistic test of US air defenses could be conducted without interference from the thousands of civilian aircraft
normally in the air?
Key quotes from New York Times articles during the 1961 NORAD exercise are eerily similar
to stories appearing on 9/11 [text in parentheses and italics added]: "It is not so much the fear of collisions with
military aircraft that has caused civilian planes to be ordered out of the skies, as it is the knowledge that inadequate
[civilian FAA] electronic flight controls will be available during the exercise to guide them. Strategic Air Command (SAC)
bombers, playing the role of the marauding forces, will seek to foul communications and radar. They will drop tinsel-like
pieces of metal called "chaff" overhead [like the myriad small pieces of metal scrap found on the Pentagon lawn and Shanksville,
Pennsylvania "crash" site on 9/11?]...that will throw radarscopes [including the FAA’s] into a confusion of false signals.";
"All the bomber missions were laid out ahead of time and fed into the NORAD computer"; "An automated shorthand running display
of the entire battle was provided at NORAD combat center and in similar centers at Strategic Air Command headquarters [where
President Bush was taken on 9/11] and in the Pentagon [which was attacked on 9/11]"; "A fight plan for every aircraft [private,
commercial and military] is fed into the computer’s memory beforehand. When a plane shows on the radarscope, a console
operator picks up an aluminum electronic gun, points it at the blip, and squeezes the trigger. That brings the flight to the
computer’s attention. If the flight [plan] is filed in its memory, the computer automatically replies, ’Yes, I
am aware of that [plane].’ It does this by marking the flight with an F for Friendly. While the computer compares the
flight with its memorized data, it marks the flight P for Pending. Finally, it may mark it H for Hostile. ’We have two
minutes to identify a flight [as Friendly] before we scramble [interceptor jets]...to make a visual identification of
an uncertain aircraft or to attack it.’; ’We do not train [in exercises like the 1961 ’Sky Shield II, or
on 9/11] with Hostile symbology [showing on screens]; therefore, the Strategic Air Command’s bombers playing the role
of the attacking [Soviet Russian] force [on October 14, 1961] were marked K, for Faker.’"; and "There are seventeen
units of Army Air Defense Artillery with ground-to-air anti-aircraft missiles near New York [in 1961; how many more were there
on 9/11, 40 years later, when none were used?]" The 1961 war game was directed by then NORAD commander Air Force Gen. Laurence
Sherman Kuter from his combat operations center at NORAD’s Colorado Springs headquarters, which in the mid-1960s moved
to Cheyenne Mountain, Gen. Eberhart’s command center on 9/11. It may also be significant that the Air Force’s
war games simulation center is at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama, which Gen. Kuter had earlier commanded and where lead
9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta received training.
The Pentagon’s "Able Danger" data miners claim that "Department
of Defense lawyers"−almost certainly from the National Security Agency, then headed by Gen. Hayden, an officer in the
Air Force, the same service that planned the 9/11 war games- blocked planned meetings with the FBI at which they wanted to
tell the FBI that they had "tracked" Atta and other of the 9/11 hijackers prior to 9/11 and ask the FBI to initiate additional
surveillance on them. The fact that the FBI did initiate exactly such a surveillance of the "up to 20 Al Qaeda linked
terrorist suspects" before 9/11 is strong evidence that, despite its current claims to the contrary, the Pentagon’s
"Able Danger" team did communicate what they learned from tracking Atta and the others to the FBI before 9/11, and
that the FBI then initiated FISA-warrant-less surveillances of Atta and others subsequently ordered stopped by then Chief
FISA Court Judge Lamberth - all prior to 9/11. The fact that initially-suspected "20th 9/11 hijacker" Moussaoui officially
filed claims that he "and my brothers" were surveilled before 9/11 is further evidence that the FBI continued to
watch all or most of the 9/11 hijackers right up until the attacks, despite Lamberth’s order to cease and desist. FBI
Headquarters supervisors David Frasca and his deputy Maltbie refused 70 --seventy-- urgent requests by Moussaoui’s
FBI interrogator for either a FISA Court warrant or an "ordinary" criminal warrant to get into Moussaoui’s computer
and surveil anyone mentioned therein. Doing so would have clearly stopped the plot, as Moussaoui now claims to have personally
known 17 -almost all- of the alleged 19 hijackers.
In addition to all the evidence that
plane-impacts-plus-fire was the carefully planned cover story for the cause of collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7, as well as the
west façade of the Pentagon, both of which were initially hit by inside-the-buildings bombs, not planes, the other overwhelming
line of evidence for 9/11 being an "Inside Job" is the anthrax attacks.
Any evidence linking 9/11 to the anthrax
letters --dated September 11 but sent in mid-October and only to Democratic leaders in Congress, no Republicans-- is direct
evidence of an inside job because that particular type of anthrax is known to have been of the highly controlled "Ames strain"
developed by the US Army at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, and at the University of Iowa in Ames, Iowa. It was also high-spore-count,
military-grade weaponized anthrax refined according to a trade secret reportedly held by William Patrick, former
Ft. Detrick bioweapons expert, mentor of Steven Hatfill, the only "person of interest" stalked by the FBI as a suspect in
the still "unsolved" anthrax case, and the close friend and colleague of Bush Administration bio-counterterrorism expert Jerry
Hauer, a signer of the PNAC manifesto calling for "a new Pearl Harbor."
On September 11, this same Jerry Hauer personally
delivered anti-anthrax Cipro to Vice President Cheney’s staff at the White House. Why? The conservative legal
watchdog group Judicial Watch has filed a suit against Vice President Cheney and other Bush Administration officials demanding
to know why Cipro was delivered to the executive mansion --and only to the executive mansion-- on the day of the
attacks. So far the response has been deafening silence. On September 10, the day before 9/11, FEMA and other emergency response
personnel arrived in New York City for a counter-bioterrorism exercise called "Tripod II" claimed by the Bush administration
to have been scheduled to begin September 12. There is reason to believe that the bio-agent this drill was to practice defending
against was anthrax, as Jerry Hauer was also a major planner of the New York City exercise. And there is also a strong possibility
the true start date for the exercise was September 11, as many "exercise" personnel were already in place in New York City
on September 10. As the Air Force’s war game scenario had just "come to life" in real attacks on 9/11, were Hauer and
Cheney worried that the same thing might be about to happen with their counter-bioterrorism "exercise" Tripod II? Is this
why the anti-anthrax drug Cipro was distributed to the White House, "just in case"? If so, it would be strong evidence
that Tripod II was on the scenario of defending New York City against an anthrax attack. Was the "vector," or delivery vehicle,
for that emergency response exercise scenario anthrax attack to have been by air via hijacked plane(s)?
their book on bioterrorism, Germs, Judith Miller and William Broad claim, apparently from inside sources, that Ramzi
Yousef’s plans for the first World Trade Center attack in 1993 included explosively pushing large quantities of cyanide
out into New York City. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind" of 9/11, is Ramzi Yousef’s uncle. Finally, former New
York City mayor Rudolf Giuliani testified to the 9/11 Commission that when WTC7, the location of his emergency operations
center, collapsed on 9/11, he moved those operations to the command and control center set up on Pier 92 for the "Tripod II"
bio-terrorism exercise and that it worked even better than the original. Giuliani told the 9/11 Commission, "The reason Pier
92 was selected as a command center was because on the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill. It had
hundreds of people there - from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from the State [Dept.], from the [New York] State Emergency
Management Office- and they were getting ready for a drill for biochemical attack. So that was going be the place they were
going to have the drill. The equipment was already there, so we were able to establish a command center there that was two
and a half to three times bigger than the command center that we had lost at 7 World Trade Center. And it was from there
that the rest of the (9/11 and subsequent) search and rescue effort was completed."
US military, not al Qaeda, had the access to plant explosives inside its own most heavily defended world headquarters, the
Pentagon. The US military, not al Qaeda, had the access to plant the explosives Willy Rodriguez heard and felt go off deep
in the sub-basement of the World Trade Center. The US military, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access weeks before 9/11 to
also plant controlled demolition charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC2, and in WTC7, which brought down
all three buildings on 9/11. The US military, not al Qaeda, had access to the sulfur-enhanced military-grade thermite (thermate)
detected in the sub-basement levels of the WTC needed to melt the steel found molten there weeks later. The US military, not
al Qaeda, would have chosen the least populated and most reinforced section of the Pentagon -its newly upgraded west wedge-
to strike, minimizing casualties. Real terrorists would have maximized them. A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda,
performed the highly skilled, high-speed 270-degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11 were sure
was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda,
would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon’s anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached
the building. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze
its own emergency response system. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had access to the weaponized, military-grade US Army
"Ames strain’ anthrax contained in letters mailed only to Democratic Congressional leaders. It is absurd to believe
that al Qaeda would target only Democrats, especially as the US leadership at the time of 9/11 was Republican. When he received
the anthrax letter dated September 11, then Senate Democratic leader Thomas Daschle was calling for a Congressional investigation
of 9/11 and had already been warned off from "looking too closely at" 9/11 by both President Bush and Vice President Cheney.
When he received his anthrax letter, another Democratic leader, Senator Patrick Leahy, was leading the Congressional resistance
to the PATRIOT Act, the assault on Americans’ privacy and civil liberties justified by "al Qaeda’s" attack,
clearly drafted by the Bush Administration before 9/11 and "in the can" awaiting its "trigger event."
who in the US military chain of command and US civilian leadership are among the prime suspects for these acts of High Treason?
First and foremost are the signers of the pre-9/11 Project for a New American Century (PNAC) manifesto calling for "a new
Pearl Harbor" to catalyze its global domination agenda, including Vice President Dick Cheney; Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld; then Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz; Richard Perle, then head of Secretary Rumsfeld’s Defense
Policy Board; Jerry Hauer, the federal government’s top bio-terrorism expert who took anti-anthrax Cipro to the White
House on 9/11; Gary Bauer, the right-wing ’family values’ zealot who ’happened’ to be one of the ’witnesses’
who immediately claimed publicly to have seen ’Flight 77 hit the Pentagon’, proven by the evidence to be a physical
impossibility; and then National Security Council Middle East adviser Zalmay Khalizad, soon to be the first US Ambassador
to Afghanistan after 9/11 and now US Ambassador to Iraq -- the very two countries whose invasions are rationalized as retaliation
for the 9/11 attacks. During the Cold War, Khalizad was a liaison to then CIA "bag man" Osama bin Laden in the CIA’s
covert war against the Soviets in Afghanistan, the crucible from which al Qaeda emerged.
Another key suspect is Air
Force General William Hayden, now Director of the CIA and then head of the National Security Agency (NSA), which tapped the
calls of lead hijacker Mohamed Atta and 9/11 "mastermind" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the day before 9/11, and surely
on many other occasions before 9/11 as well - all almost certainly without FISA warrants as required by law. These pre-9/11
warrant-less NSA taps put the lie to President Bush’s claim that he initiated the program of warrant-less NSA taps of
al Qaeda suspects because of -and thus only after- 9/11. Yet another key suspect is Army Lieutenant General William "Jerry"
Boykin, the radical Christian fundamentalist Special Operations commando recently proposed to head the Army’s Special
Operations Command. Yet another is the Pentagon’s POP2 office, reportedly to plan and script "false flag" operations
- attacks orchestrated by the US military but made to appear perpetrated by an outside enemy to justify US military "retaliation."
Yet another suspect is Defense Intelligence Agency Iran expert Lawrence "Larry" Franklin, who was "loaned" to Perle and Wolfowitz’s
neocon associate Douglas Feith and arrested for passing national security secrets to Israeli operatives at the American-Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Franklin also was and is an officer in the Air Force reserves, which directed NORAD’s
"Vigilant Guardian/Vigilant Warrior" war game exercises on 9/11.
Scrutiny should also be leveled at the scriptwriters
for the NORAD and NRO emergency response exercises planned for and held on 9/11, especially members of their lead "White Teams,"
which set the content and then oversee both "Red Team attackers" and "Blue Team defenders" on the actual day of an exercise,
in this case on 9/11 itself. And every one of the as-yet-to-be-identified "top Pentagon officials" who the day before 9/11,
according to Newsweek, suddenly cancelled their already-booked flights for September 11. Also
National Military Command Center (NMCC) commander Brig. Gen. Montague Winfield, who on that same day, September 10, asked
his deputy, Navy Capt. Charles Leidig to take over for him the next morning between 8:30 and 10:30 - precisely the time window
of the "game" whose details and date had been given to Atta. Further investigation should be directed at the (government)
"agency" the 9/11 Commission revealed, without identifying it by name, took out the vast majority of the put options on American
Airlines, United Airlines, Boeing and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter in the few days before 9/11. Also, Michael Chertoff, US Attorney
for the District of New Jersey during the first 1993 attack on the World Trade Center who, as a private attorney, represented
Egyptian-born US resident Magdy Elamir, under investigation for illegally diverting millions of dollars and whose brother,
Mohammed Elamir, funded arms smugglers linked to al Qaeda. Significantly, Mohamed Atta’s name in
his country of birth, Egypt, was also Mohamed Elamir. In other words, the very man President Bush put in charge of
the entire 9/11 "investigation" and who is now Director of Homeland Security --the top official charged with defending
the US mainland from an attack by al Qaeda-- may have been directly involved with Al Qaeda and even with Mohamed Atta himself.
And FBI headquarters supervisor David Frasca and his deputy Michael Maltbie, who ignored 70 pleas by Zacarias Moussaoui’s
FBI interrogator to let him investigate the contents of Moussaoui’s computer before 9/11. Attention should also be directed
to Phillip Zelikow, NSC adviser along with Zalmay Khalizad to then NSC Adviser Condoleezza Rice before and on 9/11. Zelikow
both orchestrated The 9/11 Commission Report cover up of the administration’s inside job and, at Rice’s
personal request, rewrote the Bush administration’s official national strategic plan draft to better match the global
domination agenda of the pre-9/11 PNAC manifesto.
These are just some of the names being knitted into the scroll of
the September 11 Truth Revolution.
- The clock stopped at the moment the Great Earthquake hit San Francisco on April 18, 1906 is at http://sfgate.com/greatquake/.
- The clock at the Pentagon heliport just outside the west section, frozen at 9:31:40 am by the violent event at the Pentagon,
was posted on an official Navy web site at: http://www.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=2480Pentagonclock_BBC. Yet another stopped Pentagon clock is in the September 11 exhibit at the Smithsonian Institution. It was originally posted
- Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) timeline document "Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis,
September 11, 2001."
- Danish Foreign Minister Per Stig Moller interview with Denmark Radio P3, September 12, 2001, 6:15 am Denmark time. "...I
saw smoke and fire rising from the Pentagon at 9:32...My first impression was that a bomb had been detonated at the Pentagon."
The audio of this radio interview is in the 9/11 video documentary "Bomberne som Forsvandt" by Danish researcher Henrik Melvang,
available at www.unmask.dk and at www.bombsinsidewtc.dk. See also 9/11 timeline by European researcher Jose Garcia in Reality, Truth and Evil Facts, Questions and Perspectives
on September 11, 2001, Temple Lodge Publications, 2005.
- The 9/11 Conspiracy, Catfeet Press/Open Court, James Fetzer, editor, 2006, chapter by Prof. James Fetzer; and
photos of a JT8D turbojet engine and the remnant found at the Pentagon at http://www.simmeringfrogs.com/articles/jt8d.html.
- Report by two civilian defense contractor employees at "Secret Global Hawk Refit for Sky Warrior," http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/
- 9/11 -- Coup Against America: The Pentagon Analysis, compilation of Pentagon eyewitness reports, photos and analyses
with hundreds of references, by Pete Tiradera, 2006, available from email@example.com.
- Pentagon eyewitness Don Perkal to MSNBC: "Even before stepping outside, I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had
gone off somewhere." Also eyewitness account of AmTrak electrical engineer Samuel Danner who was at the site and said he smelled
cordite (American Free Press, July 7, 2006, reporting based on audio report by Republic Broadcasting Network, summary at http://www.total911.info/2006/07/pentagon-eyewitness-ids-global-hawk.html).
- Author interview with former Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict,
Monterey, California; summary posted on Naval Postgraduate School web site www.nps.navy.mil, subsequently changed to www.nps.edu. Article no longer posted; hard copy available from the author.
- Videotaped testimony of William ("Willy") Rodriguez, former World Trade Center janitor and the last person to leave the
WTC alive on September 11, in the 9/11 documentary "Loose Change," second edition", text in parentheses added: "All of a sudden
we hear ’Boom!’ in the basement. I thought it was a generator that blew up, and I said to myself, ’Oh, my
God, I think it was a generator. And I was going to verbalize it, and when I finished saying that in my mind I heard (another,
second) ’Boom!’ right on the top (above), pretty far away. And so it was a difference (in space and time) between
coming from the basement and coming from the top...and a person comes running into the office (in the first basement level,
from a deeper basement level) saying ’Explosion!’...and he said ’(it was from) The elevators!’ And
there were many (deep basement WTC1) explosions."
- "Agency (NRO) Planned Exercise on September 11 Built Around a Plane Crashing into a Building," Associated Press, August
22, 2002; by Jonathan Lumpkin; "They Scrambled Jets, but It was a Race They Couldn’t Win," Syracuse Post-Standard,
January 20, 2002, by Hart Seely; "Rome Staff’s Efforts on 9/11 Earn Praise, Commission Says Military Did the Best It
Could with the Information It Had," Syracuse Post-Standard, June 18, 2004, by Hart Seely; Complete 9/11 Military
Exercises Timeline, Cooperative Research, at http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&before−9/11
Crossing the Rubicon, by Michael Ruppert, Chapter 19: "Wargames and High Tech: Paralyzing the System to Pull
Off the Attacks" and Chapter 20: "Q&A: Many Asked, Some Answered -- and a Golden Moment," New Society Publishers, 2004.
In the Acknowledgements to Rubicon, p. xi, Ruppert credits the author with what he refers to as "the Holy Grail of
9/11 research" (p. 336): Thanks to Barbara Honegger, who kept hammering on the wargames until we all paid notice... you showed
me the most important lead I needed to put it all together."
- "Detainee’s Suit Gains Support from Jet’s Log," New York Times, March 30, 2005, p. A1. Key excerpt,
text in parentheses added: "Mr. Arar (a "rendered" detainee) says he followed the (Gulfstream jet) plane’s movements
on a map displayed on a video screen (inside the plane), watching it as he traveled to Dulles Airport outside Washington,
to a Maine Airport he believed was in Portland (Maine), to Rome, and finally to Amman, Jordan, where he was blindfolded and
driven to Syria." Though the FAA claims its records show a plane on that date making the other stops but landing in Bangor,
not Portland, Maine, the detainee’s account may be accurate, as only Portland’s airport is labeled an "International
Jet Port," specializing in landings and takeoffs of just such private, corporate and government jets.
- Ironically, at the final hearing of the Kean Commission, where its report was released to the press and public, commissioner
John Lehman responded to the question, What if anything remained unknown, by noting that the Commission still wasn’t
clear as to "how Atta chose the date for the attacks."
- Summary interrogation of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, claimed "mastermind" of the September 11 attack plot, read into the Zacarias
Moussaoui sentencing trial record by the prosecution on March 27, 2006; the full text is part of the court proceedings transcript
for that date available through Exemplaris.com.
- The 9/11 Commission Report, note 116, p. 458, at http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf.
Key excerpt: "On 9/11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise, Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber
attack from the former Soviet Union."
- Air War Over America: Sept. 11 Alters Face of Air Defense Mission, by Leslie Filson, US Air Force account of
the events of September 11, p. 66. Also "Civilian Planes to be Grounded 12 Hours Today in Defense Test," New York Times,
October 14, 1961, pp. 1 and 4; "Civilian Planes Halted 12 Hours in Defense Test: Joint Maneuvers Fill Air Over Canada and
US with Military Craft, Cities ’Hit’ by Bombers," New York Times, October 15, 1961, pp. 1 and 46; "Computer
is Key to Area Defense: Ever-Alert Device in (New) Jersey Joins in Air Exercises," New York Times, October 15, 1961,
p. 46; and "US-Canada Test of Air Defense Rated a Success: President Receives a Report on Maneuvers, Search is Pushed for
Missing B−52," New York Times, October 16, 1961, pp. 1 and 16.
- For example, see "Flight 11: The Twin Flight", by "Woody Box" at http://new.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=04/03/14/212247, and "Flight 11 and Flight 93 ’Survived’" at http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/
- "Moussaoui, Undermining Case, Now Ties Himself to 9/11 Plot," New York Times, March 28, 2006, pp. A1 and A14.
- Newsweek, September 24, 2001.
- "Michael Chertoff - Where All the Questions Should Start," January 12, 2005, http://allspinzone.blogspot.com.