Political Assassinations:
John F Kennedy

Each of the following links leads to further reports on the related issue

For additional information see also the sections "C.I.A." and "New World Order" in the Main Navigation
Political Assassinations

Assassinations Of The 20th Century - Why?

John F Kennedy

VIDEO Evidence Of Revision

VIDEO The JFK Conspiracy

VIDEO JFK II: The Bush Connection

VIDEO Conspiracy Theories: JFK, 9/11 And Wellstone Part 1: JFK

Secrets Of Dallas: The Role Of George Bush In The JFK Assassination-Cum-Coup!

VIDEO Two Men In Dallas

VIDEO The Men Who Killed Kennedy (I)

VIDEO The Men Who Killed Kennedy (II): The Final Chapter

VIDEO The Clint Murchison Meeting

VIDEO It Was Johnson / LBJ...JFK And The Great American Coup D'Etat

Prince Of Thieves - Richard Nixon And The JFK Assassination

VIDEO William Cooper: JFK Assassin Unmasked

JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, And The Plot To Assassinate John F. Kennedy By L. FLETCHER PROUTY

The Guns Of Dallas By L. FLETCHER PROUTY

read also

JFK vs. The Federal Reserve


Robert F Kennedy


John F Kennedy Jr


Martin Luther King


John Lennon


The Moon Landing


The Holocaust


Bringing Democracy To The World

Related Links


The Organization of American Historians - OAH

Very Pissed Off Combat Veterans -- And Blueprints For Change By John McCarthy

Reality Or Hoax? History In Controversy - Political Assassinations: John F Kennedy -

Home | John McCarthy | CIA | Treason in Wartime | 1941-2001 | Science vs Religion | Reality Or Hoax? | Israel & ME | 9/11 - 3/11 - 7/7 -- Cui Bono? | New World Order | Lies vs Facts | War on Terror - Terrorism of War | Patriotism vs Humanity | War Crimes - Committed 'In All Our Names' | Enviroment & Lobbyism | FOIA & Whistleblowers vs Cover-Ups | Recruiting Lies vs Military Reality | From Democracy to Dictatorship | Empire Agenda | Media Coverage | International (War)Crimes Tribunals | Take Action! - Take Back America! | Summaries & Previews | Index Part 1 | Index Part 2 | Multimedia Index
Important note: Images and videos posted on this website are very graphic. Viewers discretion is strongly advised!

Prince of Thieves -
Richard Nixon and the JFK Assassination

- Part One of Three -

by E. Burton Mercer

It was a feeling of dread, of fear and loathing. Of paranoia. It was June 23, 1972, and Richard Milhous Nixon, President of the United States, was waiting for his Chief of Staff, H. R. Haldeman, to enter the Oval Office and brief him on a third-rate burglary at a local hotel complex.

The media were already making the connections. Almost as if they knew where to look, the press had connected the five burglars arrested at the Watergate hotel to the Committee to Re-Elect the President (CREEP), Nixon's cash soaked re-election apparatus. But that didn't bother Nixon as much as the man he knew had been controlling the burglars on their midnight excursion into the Watergate five nights before. That man was E. Howard Hunt, Jr., and as far as Nixon was concerned, Hunt was a time bomb waiting to go off.

Haldeman arrived. There were problems. Big problems. On June 17, the five arrested men were nothing more than nameless reactionaries; four Cuban-exiles, and another man, James W. McCord, Jr. They were caught red-handed in the Democratic National Committee's offices at the Watergate hotel complex, all wearing business suits and rubber gloves, all loaded up with screwdrivers, pliers, voice distorters and bugging devices. And cash. Lots of cash. Traceable cash. One of the burglars, Bernard L. Barker, a veteran of the Bay of Pigs fiasco of more than a decade before, had some interesting things in his bank account, and it had Nixon scared.
"But they've traced the money to 'em," proclaimed Nixon.
"Well, they have," said Haldeman. "They've traced to a name, but they haven't gotten to the guy yet."
"Would it be somebody here?" Nixon asked.
"Ken Dahlberg," Haldeman stated.
"Who the hell is Ken Dahlberg?"
"He's, ah, he gave $25,000 [to CREEP] in Minnesota and, ah, the cheque went directly in to this, to this guy Barker."
The connection was made, right there, between the Committee to Re-Elect the President and the Watergate burglars. As ominous as this was, though, Nixon knew it was only the tip of the iceberg. He had other things on his mind.

The idea of a cover-up was, to Nixon's thinking, a relatively simple procedure. Haldeman suggested that the way to stop the FBI investigation was to bring CIA Director Richard Helms on side; all Helms had to do was tell FBI Director Patrick Gray that the Watergate burglary was part of a CIA operation, "National Security" he could call it, and nip the investigation in the bud. Nixon liked the idea. "I mean you just, well, we protected Helms from one hell of a lot of things," he said. Haldeman agreed.

And then Nixon turned to his real fear, his real motivation. The words fumbled from his mouth, his paranoia bubbling hot. "Of course, this is a, this is a Hunt, you will - that will uncover a lot of things. You open that scab, there's a hell of a lot of things and that we just feel that it would be very detrimental to have this thing go any further. This involves these Cubans, Hunt, and a lot of hanky-panky that we have nothing to do with ourselves." He continued: "When you get these people in, say: 'Look, the problem is that this will open the whole, the whole Bay of Pigs thing, and the President just feels that'...ah, without going into the details...don't, don't lie to them to the extent to say there is no involvement, but just say this is a sort of comedy of errors, bizarre, without getting into it. 'The President believes that it is going to open the whole Bay of Pigs thing up again. And, ah, because these people are plugging for, for keeps and that they should call the FBI in and say that we wish for the country, don't go any further into this case', period!"

Another connection was made. First, from the Committee to Re-Elect to the Watergate burglars, and then, from the Watergate burglary to the Bay of Pigs. An abstract connection indeed. Why was Nixon scared of opening "the whole Bay of Pigs thing" up again? It was laughable. The events surrounding the botched Bay of Pigs invasion of April 1961 were, by 1972, common knowledge.

By 1960, the CIA, under the direction of Allen W. Dulles, was vehemently opposed to Fidel Castro's relatively new Communist regime in Cuba, and proceeded to devise a plan to land several thousand Cuban-exiles at Cuba's Bay of Pigs in a pre-dawn invasion. Once established, the exiles were to form a provisional government, and Castro would then be toppled in a popular coup as thousands of Cuban's joined this government in a new, democratic revolution.

Unfortunately for the CIA, however, the newly sworn in president, John F. Kennedy, wisely refused to provide US military assistance for the invasion. As a result, the Cuban-exile brigade were slaughtered or captured on the beach head before the invasion really got underway.

This Kennedy decision foiled the CIA's plans in more ways than one. The Bay of Pigs strategy had counted on US military assistance, with the CIA knowing full well that Castro's forces could easily take the exile brigade alone in battle. Kennedy had told the CIA months in advance that no military assistance would be provided, yet the CIA went ahead with their invasion preparations anyway.

They were hoping to bluff Kennedy into committing US forces, to scare him into intervention. That tact, as history shows, failed.

The end result was egg on the new Kennedy administration's face. To the world at large, the new Commander-in-Chief had bungled his first foreign policy initiative, an initiative that had begun with the previous Eisenhower administration. In the long term, however, a more ominous specter has risen; Kennedy had created three new, rabid enemies: the Cuban-exile community, Fidel Castro, and more importantly, the CIA. Battle lines were being drawn.

Whilst accepting public responsibility for the invasion's failure, privately Kennedy knew that the CIA had lied to him. He took immediate action, and over the ensuing months, animosity between the White House and Central Intelligence festered into paranoia and deceit. Eventually, heads started to roll. CIA Director Allen Dulles was fired. Director of Plans Richard Bissell was fired. And Deputy Director Gen. Charles P. Cabell was fired.

Kennedy then instigated a massive overhaul of the CIA's role in peacetime. Tactfully proclaiming to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds", Kennedy issued a series of top secret directives, National Security Action Memoranda's (NSAM's) #55, #56 and #57, which theoretically ordered the Joint Chiefs of Staff to take control of covert paramilitary operations - a responsibility previously enjoyed by the CIA. Changes were afoot, to say the least.

Unfortunately, Kennedy's new directives were never implemented, the documents instead being relegated to a filing cabinet to collect dust. Apparently even the Joint Chiefs didn't want to upset the CIA. And who can blame them?

But that was history. Now it was 1972, and the events surrounding the Bay of Pigs fiasco were old news, disseminated many years before by many different people, the military, the media, the public.

Yet, for some reason, it was driving Richard Nixon nuts. Nixon's weird secrecy didn't escape Bob Haldeman's watchful eye. A man trained and accustomed to Nixon's ways, Haldeman was known as the president's "Berlin Wall"; and besides, he had been through the bizarre "Bay of Pigs thing" before.

As far back as 1969, immediately after Nixon had assumed office, John Ehrlichman, Nixon's chief adviser on domestic affairs, was called into the Oval Office. Nixon said he wanted all the facts and documents the CIA had on the Bay of Pigs, a complete report on the whole project".

According to Haldeman, "about six months after that 1969 conversation, Ehrlichman had stopped in my office. 'Those bastards in Langley are holding back something,'" Ehrlichman had said. "'They just dig in their heels and say the President can't have it. Period. Imagine that! The Commander-in-Chief wants to see a document relating to a military operation, and the spooks say he can't have it.'
'What is it?'
'I don't know,'" Ehrlichman said. "'But from the way they're protecting it, it must be pure dynamite.'"
Despite all of this, however, Ehrlichman was confident that CIA Director Richard Helms would comply to Nixon's request. "Rest assured," he said. "The point will be made. In fact, Helms is on his way over here right now. The President is going to give him a direct order to turn over that document to me."

Haldeman states: "Helms did show up that afternoon and saw the President for a long secret conversation. When Helms left, Ehrlichman returned to the Oval Office. The next thing I knew Ehrlichman appeared in my office, dropped into a chair, and just stared at me. He was more furious that I had ever seen him; absolutely speechless...I said, 'What happened?'
'This is what happened,' Ehrlichman said. 'The Mad Monk [Nixon] has just told me I am now to forget all about that CIA document. In fact, I am to cease and desist from trying to obtain it.'

Even the most cursory and disinterested examination of the above series of events would lead one to conclude that CIA Director Helms had told Nixon not to pursue this "Bay of Pigs document", for reasons not yet known. One might assume that this "dynamite" document was highly classified, yet the only classified document (as of 1972) relating to the Bay of Pigs operation was The Cuban Study Group document, drawn up at the behest of President Kennedy in the wake of the invasion fiasco.

Yet this document was not a CIA document; it was a military document, and the CIA had no control over it.

Reasonably, the only other explanation is that "Bay of Pigs" referred to something else; a code word for some other top secret CIA operation that both Nixon and Helms had intimate knowledge of. And as far as Nixon was concerned, this "Bay of Pigs" operation was "dynamite" enough to cause the CIA to stop the FBI's Watergate investigation.

Nixon continued: "...[it's] very bad, to have this fellow [Howard] Hunt, ah, you know, ah, it's he, he knows too damn much and he was involved, we happen to know that. And that it gets out that the whole, this is all involved in the Cuban thing, that it's a fiasco, and it's going to make the...CIA look bad, it's going to make Hunt look bad, and it's likely to blow the whole, uh, Bay of Pigs thing which we think would be very unfortunate for [the] CIA and for the country at this time, and for American foreign policy..."

With a final "I would just say, 'Look, it's because of the Hunt involvement'", Nixon ordered Bob Haldeman to meet with CIA Director Helms and begin the Watergate cover-up. And Bob Haldeman did just that.

From prison, Haldeman would later write: "This time the CIA was ready. In fact, it was more than ready. It was ahead of the game by months. Nixon would walk into what I now believe was a trap."

That afternoon of June 23, 1972, Bob Haldeman and John Ehrlichman met with CIA Director Richard Helms and Deputy Director Vernon Walters in Ehrlichman's White House office. The CIA "was stonewalling me" says Haldeman, claiming that the Watergate break-in was in "no way" connected to a domestic CIA activity. That was until Haldeman decided to play "Nixon's trump card."

"The President asked me to tell you [that] this entire affair may be connected to the Bay of Pigs," Haldeman said. "And if it opens up, the Bay of Pigs may be blown..."

According to Haldeman, this statement was followed by "turmoil in the room" with CIA Director Helms "gripping the arms of his chair, leaning forward and shouting, 'The Bay of Pigs had nothing to do with this! I have no concern about the Bay of Pigs!'"

"Silence. I just sat there," Haldeman later recalled. "I was absolutely shocked by Helms' violent reaction. Again I wondered, what was such dynamite in the Bay of Pigs story?"

Haldeman later "went back to see the President and told him his strategy had worked. I told Helms that the Watergate investigation 'tracks back to the Bay of Pigs.' So at that point...he said we'll be very happy to be helpful."

Nixon was more than pleased. His "Bay of Pigs" strategy had worked, and the CIA were now more than willing to comply in a cover-up of the Watergate break-in.

Yet Haldeman's confusion remained. He still had no idea what "Bay of Pigs" actually meant; whatever it was however, it certainly had both Nixon and Helms scared. Scared enough to instigate one of the biggest cover-ups in history. All Haldeman knew was that it involved "these Cubans", "Hunt" and "the CIA", and that if the truth were ever to come out it would effect "the CIA", "the country" and "American foreign policy".

And all of this because five guys got busted in a break-in at the Watergate hotel.

Years later, former CBS news correspondent Dan Schorr contacted Haldeman. Schorr had been investigating CIA covert activities, and according to Haldeman, Schorr had uncovered evidence relating to "the mystery of the Bay of Pigs connection in those dealings between Nixon and Helms."

Haldeman then began to "put Schorr's facts together with mine", and in doing so inadvertently stumbled onto the real mystery behind Watergate, the real meaning of "the Bay of Pigs".

He had also unlocked the darkest secret, the deepest fear in Richard Milhous Nixon's political past.

"It seems that in all of those Nixon references to the Bay of Pigs," Haldeman later said, "he was actually referring to the Kennedy assassination."


Check for latest Site-Updates

Index of Posted Articles

or copy and paste the URL into Google Translate

Important note:

We neither promote nor condone hate speech in any way, shape or form. We have created this website to search for truthful facts that can shape unconventional conclusions and restore historical integrity. The work is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution as well as by Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this website are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This website has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

Copyright John McCarthy 2005 if not indicated otherwise

Ages ago, I taught my children "never to point with a naked finger towards dressed people" and I usually keep that for myself as well but for this website I have to quote:
"The Emporer Has NO Clothes On!"

Want to get in touch? You can send email at:


Disclaimer And Fair Use