More Damning than Downing Street
by Paul Rogat Loeb
06/15/05 "Common Dreams" - - It's bad enough that the Bush administration
had so little international support for the Iraqi war that their "coalition of the willing" meant the U.S., Britain, and the
equivalent of a child's imaginary friends. It's even worse that, as the Downing Street memo confirms, they had so little evidence
of real threats that they knew from the start that they were going to have manufacture excuses to go to war. What's more damning
still is that they effectively began this war even before the congressional vote.
With Congressman John Conyers about to hold hearings,
coverage of the Downing Street memo is finally beginning to leak into the media. In contrast, we've
heard almost nothing about the degree to which this administration began actively fighting the Iraq war well in advance of
the March 2003 official attack--before both the October 2002 US Congressional authorization and the November United Nations
resolution requiring that Saddam Hussein open the country up to inspectors.
I follow Iraq pretty closely, but
was taken aback when Charlie Clements, now head of the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, described driving in a Baghdad
neighborhood six months before the war "and a building would just explode, hit by a missile from 30,000 feet -'What is that
building?'" Clements would ask. "'Oh, that's a telephone exchange.'" Later, at a conference at Nevada's Nellis Air Force Base,
Clements heard a U.S. General boast "that he began taking out assets that could help in resisting an invasion at least six
months before war was declared."
Earlier this month, Jeremy Scahill wrote a powerful piece on The Nation's website, (posted on this site as well: The Other Bomb Drops) describing a huge air assault in September 2002,
"Approximately 100 US and British planes flew from Kuwait
into Iraqi airspace," Scahill writes. "At least seven types of aircraft were part of this massive operation, including US
F-15 Strike Eagles and Royal Air Force Tornado ground-attack planes. They dropped precision-guided munitions on Saddam Hussein's
major western air-defense facility, clearing the path for Special Forces helicopters that lay in wait in Jordan. Earlier attacks
had been carried out against Iraqi command and control centers, radar detection systems, Revolutionary Guard units, communication
centers and mobile air-defense systems. The Pentagon's goal was clear: Destroy Iraq's ability to resist."
aren't we talking about this? As Scahill points out, this was a month before the Congressional vote, and two before the UN
resolution. Supposedly part of enforcing "no fly zones," the bombings were actually systematic assaults on Iraq's capacity
to defend itself. The US had never declared war. Bush had no authorization, not even a fig leaf. He was simply attacking another
nation because he'd decided to do so. This preemptive war preempted our own Congress, as well as international law.
don't think most Americans know these prewar attacks ever happened, aside from those who've read Scahill's recent piece, or
heard him on Democracy Now. I recall no mainline media coverage at the time, and little in the alternative press. The bombings
that destroyed Iraq's air defenses were under the radar for both the American media and public.
If coverage of
the Downing Street memo continues to increase, I suspect the administration will try to dismiss it as mere diplomatic talk,
just inside baseball. But they weren't just manipulating intelligence so they could attack no matter how Saddam Hussein responded.
They weren't only bribing would-be allies into participation. They were fighting a war they'd planned long before. They just
didn't bother to tell the American public.
Paul Loeb is the author of The Impossible Will Take a Little While:
A Citizen's Guide to Hope in a Time of Fear (Basic Books), named the #3 political book of 2004 by the History Channel and
American Book Association. See http://www.theimpossible.org
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator
of this article nor is Information Clearing House endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)