Important Reports

To read the posts on the other issues please use the links named after the different page-subtitles.

For additional information see also the sections

Lies & The Propaganda Of Fear


vs. The Facts


News & Comments

Important Reports

WMD Commission Continues The Stonewall For Bush

John Youmans: "It's a Slam Dunk" Debunked

Secret memo shows how U.S. 'sold' Iraq war

Venice Terrorist Flight School Linked To CIA

Intelligence Without Agenda

Big Lies, Blind Spies, and Vanity Fair

Same Committee, Same Combatants, Different Tune

Senators Question CIA Cooperation in Inquiry

Who Forged the Niger Documents?

Iraqi Defector Behind America's WMD Claims Exposed As 'Out-And-Out Fabricator'

Pentagon Increases Its Spying Markedly

Soviet Intelligence Chief: U.S. Using Anti-Terror War to Gain World Oil Reserves

'Intelligence Fiasco' Stirs Up the Korean Peninsula

Intelligence Analysts Whiffed on a 'Curveball'

WMDs: Doubts on Weapons Were Dismissed

WMD Commission: Yet Another Intelligence Failure

Intelligence Agencies' Record on Weapons

Related Links

American Rhetoric: Rhetoric of 9-11

September 11 News: Osama bin Laden Speeches

The Path of War Timeline

Very Pissed Off Combat Veterans -- And Blueprints For Change By John McCarthy

The Lies That Led Us To Wage Wars

- Important Reports -

Home | John McCarthy | CIA | Treason in Wartime | 1941-2001 | Science vs Religion | Reality Or Hoax? | Israel & ME | 9/11 - 3/11 - 7/7 -- Cui Bono? | New World Order | Lies vs Facts | War on Terror - Terrorism of War | Patriotism vs Humanity | War Crimes - Committed 'In All Our Names' | Enviroment & Lobbyism | FOIA & Whistleblowers vs Cover-Ups | Recruiting Lies vs Military Reality | From Democracy to Dictatorship | Empire Agenda | Media Coverage | International (War)Crimes Tribunals | Take Action! - Take Back America! | Summaries & Previews | Index Part 1 | Index Part 2 | Multimedia Index


Intelligence Without Agenda


April 17, 2005

Intelligence gathering is more art than science, a craft in which information about potential enemies' intentions and abilities is nearly always iffy. Analysts looking at the same facts can reach different conclusions. Does Iraq have weapons of mass destruction? Does Cuba have biological weapons? The answers can prompt presidents to send soldiers to fight and die.

Hearings in Washington last week on the proposed U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, John R. Bolton, and the nominee for the country's first director of national intelligence, John D. Negroponte, illustrate the political struggles that can blur the spies' work, and the difficulty of controlling battles for influence among intelligence agencies.

The State Department's former intelligence chief, Carl W. Ford Jr., last week described Bolton as a "bully" who kicked those beneath him on the organizational chart. Still more damning was Ford's description of Bolton's treatment of an analyst who felt Bolton's language about an alleged Cuban biological weapons program was not supported by facts. Bolton, since 2001 the undersecretary of State for arms control and international security, reacted by screaming at the man and throwing him out of his office. Bolton has denied charges that he tried to get the analyst fired, saying he merely wanted to have him reassigned because he'd lost confidence in him. That still sounds like attempted punishment for not shaping facts to the desired conclusions.

Negroponte, who was the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. when Iraq's dangers were debated before the invasion, has his own experience with uncertain intelligence presented as certainty. He saw former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell make the United States' most persuasive case that Saddam Hussein's Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. Powell confidently used photographs and eavesdropped conversations to bolster his argument, yet it turned out the weapons were not there.

The latest investigation of the state of U.S. intelligence found no evidence of pressure to shape intelligence on Iraq's capabilities. Even Bolton aside, the definition of pressure must be changing. CIA analysts had periodically complained in the months prior to war that they were being pressured by superiors to support the thesis ultimately reflected in Powell's U.N. speech.

Negroponte, a career diplomat whose role as ambassador to Honduras during the Iran-Contra scandal continues to trouble many, was vague about his plans for the intelligence agencies. As some Capitol observers noted, he may be trying not to telegraph his intentions to internal antagonists.

Negroponte's appointment, depending on his authority and skill, could help quell the agencies' dogfight for power, money and access. But those efforts would be undercut by Bolton-like behavior, which feeds the impression that politically acceptable intelligence gets access and the rest gets exile.

Negroponte will need strong support from President Bush as he supervises 15 spy agencies, many of them in the Defense Department's bailiwick. It is Bush, not Negroponte, who can ensure that his Cabinet officials do not demand political tidiness from spies.


Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times


Bottom Line.....What will the new Intel Czar do with irrifutable evidence of Treason In Wartime, on this site? Will he follow the Intelligence Committee and the recently departed Attorney General who collectively buried their sorry heads in the sands of denial?

Check for latest Site-Updates

Index of Posted Articles

or copy and paste the URL into Google Translate

Important note:

We neither promote nor condone hate speech in any way, shape or form. We have created this website to search for truthful facts that can shape unconventional conclusions and restore historical integrity. The work is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution as well as by Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this website are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This website has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

Copyright John McCarthy 2005 if not indicated otherwise

Ages ago, I taught my children "never to point with a naked finger towards dressed people" and I usually keep that for myself as well but for this website I have to quote:
"The Emporer Has NO Clothes On!"

Want to get in touch? You can send email at:


Disclaimer And Fair Use