Israel - The Country That Wouldn't Grow Up


Peace Agreements

To read the posts on the other issues please use the links named after the different page-subtitles.

__________________

Reports & Comments

__________________

Historical Background

__________________

The State Of Israel

__________________

Israeli Intelligence Community

__________________

Israel & The Media

__________________

UN Resolutions & International Law

_______________
Peace Agreements

The 1988 Compromise Revisited - It's Not Hamas Terror Israel Fears

Video: A Real History of The 'Middle East Peace Process'

There Could Have Been Peace - The Arab Peace Initiative, 2002

VIDEO Israel And The Arabs: Elusive Peace Part I: Clinton (1999-2000)

VIDEO Israel And The Arabs: Elusive Peace Part II: Arafat (2001-2002)

VIDEO Israel And The Arabs: Elusive Peace Part III: Sharon (2003-2005)

_______________

Main Source Of Conflicts: Water?


Israel's Wars
 
the following links lead to reports on the related wars
__________________
1948 War

War Of Independence

__________________
1956 Suez Crisis

The Suez Crisis

__________________
1967 June War

The 6-Day War

__________________
1973 October War

Yom Kippur War

__________________
1982 Lebanon Invasion

Operation Peace for Galilee

__________________
1987 Palestine

The First Intifada

__________________
2000 Palestine

The Second Uprising (Al-Aqsa Intifada)

__________________
2006 Lebanon

Re-Invading Lebanon!


Related Links

MidEastWeb

If Americans Knew

Jewish Virtual Library

The (CIA) World Factbook

Very Pissed Off Combat Veterans -- And Blueprints For Change By John McCarthy

Israel & The Middle East Conflict

- Peace Agreements -

Home | John McCarthy | CIA | Treason in Wartime | 1941-2001 | Science vs Religion | Reality Or Hoax? | Israel & ME | 9/11 - 3/11 - 7/7 -- Cui Bono? | New World Order | Lies vs Facts | War on Terror - Terrorism of War | Patriotism vs Humanity | War Crimes - Committed 'In All Our Names' | Enviroment & Lobbyism | FOIA & Whistleblowers vs Cover-Ups | Recruiting Lies vs Military Reality | From Democracy to Dictatorship | Empire Agenda | Media Coverage | International (War)Crimes Tribunals | Take Action! - Take Back America! | Summaries & Previews | Index Part 1 | Index Part 2 | Multimedia Index

VIDEO
Israel And The Arabs:
Elusive Peace
Part II: Arafat (2001-2002)

A new three part documentary series examines the last six years of the Arab-Israeli peace process from the point of view of presidents and prime ministers, their generals and ministers and those behind the suicide bombs and assassinations. The series reveals what happened behind closed doors as the peace process failed and the violence of the intifada exploded.

Part II: Arafat (2001-2002)

The former US Secretary of State, Colin Powell attempted to make peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

However, his efforts were derailed by his own hard-line colleagues.

And the Palestinian leader, Yasser Arafat himself.

runtime 50:23, click play to start each sequence

See complete video series:

VIDEO Israel And The Arabs: Elusive Peace Part I: Clinton (1999-2000)

VIDEO Israel And The Arabs: Elusive Peace Part II: Arafat (2001-2002)

VIDEO Israel And The Arabs: Elusive Peace Part III: Sharon (2003-2005)

Analysis: Bush camp's Mid-East split
US Secretary of State Colin Powell
Mr Powell was again left out to dry

By Jon Leyne
BBC US State Department correspondent

It has been a muddle for months, but this week the divisions over the United States' Middle East policy became painfully clear.

It was comments by the Secretary of State Colin Powell that started it off.

In an interview with the Arabic newspaper, al- Hayat, he spoke of the possibility of setting up a provisional Palestinian state.

Mr Powell referred to the Palestinian Authority as a "government". And he said, quite categorically, that the United States would continue to work with Yasser Arafat.

It fell to the White House spokesman, Ari Fleischer, to deliver a very public humiliation.

Asked whether President George W Bush endorsed Mr Powell's remarks, Mr Fleischer said only that "the president has been receiving advice from any number of people, and many of these people give him multiple pieces of advice about the Middle East".

It was hardly a ringing vote of support.

Damage control

As Mr Powell travelled to a meeting of foreign ministers in Whistler, Canada, he began the damage limitation.

"I think I've talked about this a number of times before and the ideas that are out there with respect to how you move forward," he told reporters on his plane.

The trouble is that the idea of a provisional Palestinian state has not been aired by him publicly.

And his open support for continuing to talk with Yasser Arafat set a very different tone to the president's almost daily expressions of frustration with the Palestinian leader.

It's all very reminiscent of Mr Powell's early baptism of fire as secretary of state, when he spoke about negotiations with North Korea - only to have the rug pulled very swiftly under him by the White House.

Now it appears that President Bush has softened the humiliation a little bit, talking of "the evolution of a Palestinian state".

Pulled two ways

All this comes as the United States policy towards the Middle East undergoes yet another review.

It has just been discussed by the G8 foreign ministers' meeting.

More of the key players will be in Washington for meetings on Friday. Then some time next week, President Bush is expected to pronounce.

As so often, Mr Bush is being torn in two precisely opposite directions.

Moderate Arab nations, and most of the United States' allies in Europe and around the world want a greater involvement in peace making, an early peace conference, and a timetable leading to the creation of a Palestinian state.

But domestic opinion in the United States supports the scepticism being poured on all those ideas by the Israeli government.

So once again, Mr Bush and his advisers are working overtime carefully to craft a compromise that he will unveil to the world.

Poll watchers

And once again the lesson is the same.

This is an administration that pays an extraordinary degree of attention to domestic opinion when it formulates foreign policy.

Hence any ideas emerging from the State Department are examined line by line in the White House for their popularity at home.

That is already painfully clear from President Bush's policies on global warming, steel tariffs, and host of other issues.

For the reason, you need to look no further than the tiny margin of victory in the 2000 presidential election.

Mr Bush knows that if he is to be re-elected, he cannot afford to waste a single vote on being nice to foreigners - however much that leaves his secretary of state hanging out to dry.

Source:
news.bbc.co.uk

Check for latest Site-Updates

Index of Posted Articles

or copy and paste the URL into Google Translate

Important note:

We neither promote nor condone hate speech in any way, shape or form. We have created this website to search for truthful facts that can shape unconventional conclusions and restore historical integrity. The work is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution as well as by Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this website are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This website has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

 
Copyright John McCarthy 2005 if not indicated otherwise

 
Ages ago, I taught my children "never to point with a naked finger towards dressed people" and I usually keep that for myself as well but for this website I have to quote:
"The Emporer Has NO Clothes On!"
Traude
 

 
Want to get in touch? You can send email at:
 

or

Disclaimer And Fair Use