The Global Death Squad of George W. Bush by Chris Floyd
December 10, 2005 ChrisFloyd.com
The much-belated, poll-prompted outcry of a few American elected officials against the widespread use of torture by
the Bush Administration – following years of silent acquiescence
in the face of incontrovertible evidence of deliberate atrocity – is a welcome development, of course. But it has left
an even more sinister aspect of Bushist policy untouched, one that likewise has been hidden in plain sight for years.
September 17, 2001, George W. Bush signed an executive order authorizing the use of "lethal measures" against anyone in the
world whom he or his minions designated an "enemy combatant." This order remains in force today. No judicial evidence, no
hearing, no charges are required for these killings; no law, no border, no oversight restrains them. Bush has also given agents
in the field carte blanche to designate "enemies" on their own initiative and kill them as they see fit.
of this universal death squad
– and the total obliteration of human liberty it represents – has not provoked so much as a crumb, an atom, a
quantum particle of controversy in the American Establishment, although it's no secret. The executive order was first bruited
in the Washington Post in October 2001
. I first wrote of it in my Moscow Times column in November 2001
. The New York Times added further details in December 2002
. That same month, Bush officials made clear that the dread edict also applied to American citizens, as the Associated Press
The first officially confirmed use of this power was the killing of an American citizen
in Yemen by a CIA drone missile on November 3, 2002. A similar strike occurred in Pakistan this month
, when a CIA missile destroyed a house and purportedly killed Abu Hamza Rabia, a suspected al Qaeda figure. But the only bodies
found at the site were those of two children, the houseowner's son and nephew, Reuters reports. The grieving father denied
any connection to terrorism. An earlier CIA strike on another house missed Rabia but killed his wife and children, Pakistani
But most of the assassinations are carried out in secret, quietly, professionally, like a contract
killing for the mob. As a Pentagon document unearthed by the New Yorker in December 2002
put it, the death squads must be "small and agile," and "able to operate clandestinely, using a full range of official and
non-official cover arrangements to…enter countries surreptitiously."
The dangers of this policy are obvious,
as a UN report on "extrajudicial killings" noted in December 2004
: "Empowering governments to identify and kill 'known terrorists' places no verifiable obligation upon them to demonstrate
in any way that those against whom lethal force is used are indeed terrorists… While it is portrayed as a limited 'exception'
to international norms, it actually creates the potential for an endless expansion of the relevant category to include any
enemies of the State, social misfits, political opponents, or others."
It's hard to believe that any genuine democracy
would accept a claim by its leader that he could have anyone killed simply by labeling them an "enemy." It's hard to believe
that any adult with even the slightest knowledge of history or human nature could countenance such unlimited, arbitrary power,
knowing the evil it is bound to produce. Yet this is what the great and good in America have done. Like the boyars of old,
they not only countenance but celebrate
their enslavement to the ruler.
This was vividly demonstrated in one of the revolting scenes in recent American history:
Bush's State of the Union address
in January 2003, delivered to Congress and televised nationwide during the final frenzy of war-drum beating before the assault
on Iraq. Trumpeting his successes in the Terror War, Bush claimed that "more than 3,000 suspected terrorists" had been arrested
worldwide – "and many others have met a different fate." His face then took on the characteristic leer, the strange,
sickly half-smile it acquires whenever he speaks of killing people: "Let's put it this way. They are no longer a problem."
In other words, the suspects – and even Bush acknowledged they were only suspects – had been murdered.
Lynched. Killed by agents operating unsupervised in that shadow world where intelligence, terrorism, politics, finance and
organized crime meld together in one amorphous, impenetrable mass. Killed on the word of a dubious informer
, perhaps: a tortured captive willing to say anything to end his torment, a business rival, a personal foe, a bureaucrat looking
to impress his superiors, a paid snitch in need of cash, a zealous crank pursuing ethnic, tribal or religious hatreds –
or any other purveyor of the garbage data that is coin of the realm in the shadow world.
Bush proudly held up this
hideous system as an example of what he called "the meaning of American justice." And the assembled legislators…applauded.
Oh, how they applauded! They roared with glee at the leering little man's bloodthirsty, B-movie machismo. They shared his
sneering contempt for law – our only shield, however imperfect, against the blind, brute, ignorant, ape-like force of
raw power. Not a single voice among them was raised in protest against this tyrannical machtpolitik: not that night, not the
next day, not ever.
Not even now, when the American people's growing revulsion at Bush's bloody handiwork has emboldened
a few long-time enablers of atrocity to criticize the "excesses" of his gulag and his "mishandling" of the war of aggression
in Iraq. A few nips at the flank
of the beast have been permitted. But the corroded heart of Bush's system of state terror – officially sanctioned murder
by presidential fiat – remains curiously sacrosanct.