The Origins of the Overclass
By Steve Kangas
have always used many methods to accumulate wealth, but it was not until the mid-1970s that these
methods coalesced into a superbly organized, cohesive and efficient machine. After 1975, it became greater than the sum of
its parts, a smooth flowing organization of advocacy groups, lobbyists, think tanks, conservative foundations, and PR firms
that hurtled the richest 1 percent into the stratosphere.
The origins of this machine, interestingly enough, can be traced back to the CIA. This is not to say the machine is a formal
CIA operation, complete with code name and signed documents. (Although such evidence may yet surface — and previously
unthinkable domestic operations such as MK-ULTRA, CHAOS and MOCKINGBIRD show this to be a distinct possibility.) But what
we do know already indicts the CIA strongly enough. Its principle creators were Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon,
Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, William F. Buckley, Jr., the Rockefeller family, and more. Almost all the machine's
creators had CIA backgrounds.
During the 1970s, these men would take the propaganda and operational techniques they had learned in the Cold War and apply
them to the Class War. Therefore it is no surprise that the American version of the machine bears an uncanny resemblance to
the foreign versions designed to fight communism. The CIA's expert and comprehensive organization of the business class would
succeed beyond their wildest dreams. In 1975, the richest 1 percent owned 22 percent of America’s wealth. By 1992, they
would nearly double that, to 42 percent — the highest level of inequality in the 20th century.
How did this alliance start? The CIA has always recruited the nation’s elite: millionaire businessmen, Wall Street
brokers, members of the national news media, and Ivy League scholars. During World War II, General "Wild Bill" Donovan became
chief of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA. Donovan recruited so exclusively from the nation’s
rich and powerful that members eventually came to joke that "OSS" stood for "Oh, so social!"
Another early elite was Allen Dulles, who served as Director of the CIA from 1953 to 1961. Dulles was a senior partner
at the Wall Street firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Rockefeller empire and other mammoth trusts, corporations
and cartels. He was also a board member of the J. Henry Schroeder Bank, with offices in Wall Street, London, Zurich and Hamburg.
His financial interests across the world would become a conflict of interest when he became head of the CIA. Like Donavan,
he would recruit exclusively from society’s elite.
By the 1950s, the CIA had riddled the nation’s businesses, media and universities with tens of thousands of part-time,
on-call operatives. Their employment with the agency took a variety of forms, which included:
- Leaving one's profession to work for the CIA in a formal, official capacity.
- Staying in one's profession, using the job as cover for CIA activity. This undercover activity could be full-time, part-time,
- Staying in one's profession, occasionally passing along information useful to the CIA.
- Passing through the revolving door that has always existed between the agency and the business world.
Historically, the CIA and society’s elite have been one and the same people. This means that their interests and
goals are one and the same as well. Perhaps the most frequent description of the intelligence community is the "old boy network,"
where members socialize, talk shop, conduct business and tap each other for favors well outside the formal halls of government.
Many common traits made it inevitable that the CIA and Corporate America would become allies. Both share an intense dislike
of democracy, and feel they should be liberated from democratic regulations and oversight. Both share a culture of secrecy,
either hiding their actions from the American public or lying about them to present the best public image. And both are in
a perfect position to help each other.
How? International businesses give CIA agents cover, secret funding, top-quality resources and important contacts in foreign
lands. In return, the CIA gives corporations billion-dollar federal contracts (for spy planes, satellites and other hi-tech
spycraft). Businessmen also enjoy the romantic thrill of participating in spy operations. The CIA also gives businesses a
certain amount of protection and privacy from the media and government watchdogs, under the guise of "national security."
Finally, the CIA helps American corporations remain dominant in foreign markets, by overthrowing governments hostile to unregulated
capitalism and installing puppet regimes whose policies favor American corporations at the expense of their people.
The CIA’s alliance with the elite turned out to be an unholy one. Each enabled the other to rise above the law. Indeed,
a review of the CIA’s history is one of such crime and atrocity that no one can reasonably defend it, even in the name
of anticommunism. Before reviewing this alliance in detail, it is useful to know the CIA’s history of atrocity first.
The Crimes of the CIA
During World War II, the OSS actively engaged in propaganda, sabotage and countless other dirty tricks. After the war,
and even after the CIA was created in 1947, the American intelligence community reverted to harmless information gathering
and analysis, thinking that the danger to national security had passed. That changed in 1948 with the emergence of the Cold
War. In that year, the CIA recreated its covert action wing, innocuously called the Office of Policy Coordination. Its first
director was Wall Street lawyer Frank Wisner. According to its secret charter, its responsibilities included
propaganda, economic warfare, preventive direct action, including sabotage, antisabotage, demolition and evacuation procedures;
subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-communist
elements in threatened countries of the free world.
By 1953, the dirty tricks department of the CIA had grown to 7,200
personnel and commanded 74 percent of the CIA’s total budget. The following quotes describe the culture of lawlessness
that pervaded the CIA:
Stanley Lovell, a CIA recruiter for "Wild Bill" Donovan: "What I have to do is to stimulate the Peck's Bad Boy
beneath the surface of every American scientist and say to him, 'Throw all your normal law-abiding concepts out the window.
Here's a chance to raise merry hell. Come help me raise it.'" (1)
George Hunter White, writing of his CIA escapades: "I toiled wholeheartedly in the vineyards because it was fun, fun,
fun... Where else could a red-blooded American boy lie, kill, cheat, steal, rape and pillage with the sanction and blessing
of the all-highest?" (2)
A retired CIA agency caseworker with twenty years experience: "I never gave a thought to legality or morality. Frankly,
I did what worked."
Blessed with secrecy and lack of congressional oversight, CIA operations became corrupt almost
immediately. Using propaganda stations like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, the CIA felt justified in manipulating
the public for its own good. The broadcasts were so patently false that for a time it was illegal to publish transcripts of
them in the U.S. This was a classic case of a powerful organization deciding what was best for the people, and then abusing
the powers it had helped itself to.
During the 40s and 50s, most of the public was unaware of what the CIA was doing. Those who knew thought they were fighting
the good fight against communism, like James Bond. However, they could not keep their actions secret forever, and by the 60s
and 70s, Americans began learning about the agency’s crimes and atrocities. (3) It turns out the CIA
- Corrupted democratic elections in Greece, Italy and dozens of other nations;
- Been involved to varying degrees in at least 35 assassination plots against foreign heads of state or prominent political
leaders. Successful assassinations include democratically elected leaders like Salvador Allende (Chile) and Patrice Lumumba
(Belgian Congo); also CIA-created dictators like Rafael Trujillo (Dominican Republic) and Ngo Dinh Diem (South Vietnam); and
popular political leaders like Che Guevara. Unsuccessful attempts range from Fidel Castro to Charles De Gaulle.
- Helped launch military coups that toppled democratic governments, replacing them with brutal dictatorships or
juntas. The list of overthrown democratic leaders includes Mossadegh (Iran, 1953), Arbenz (Guatemala, 1954), Velasco and
Arosemena (Ecuador, 1961, 1963), Bosch (Dominican Republic, 1963), Goulart (Brazil, 1964), Sukarno (Indonesia, 1965), Papandreou
(Greece, 1965-67), Allende (Chile, 1973), and dozens of others.
- Undermined the governments of Australia, Guyana, Cambodia, Jamaica and more;
- Supported murderous dictators like General Pinochet (Chile), the Shah of Iran, Ferdinand Marcos (Phillipines), "Papa Doc"
and "Baby Doc" Duvalier (Haiti), General Noriega (Panama), Mobutu Sese Seko (Ziare), the "reign of the colonels" (Greece),
- Created, trained and supported death squads and secret police forces that tortured and murdered hundreds of thousands
of civilians, leftists and political opponents, in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Haiti, Bolivia, Cuba, Mexico, Uruguay,
Brazil, Chile, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Iran, Turkey, Angola and others;
- Helped run the "School of the Americas" at Fort Benning, Georgia, which trains Latin American military officers how to
overthrow democratic governments. Subjects include the use of torture, interrogation and murder;
- Used Michigan State "professors" to train Diem’s secret police in torture;
- Conducted economic sabotage, including ruining crops, disrupting industry, sinking ships and creating food shortages;
- Paved the way for the massacre of 200,000 in East Timor, 500,000 in Indonesia and one to two million in Cambodia;
- Launched secret or illegal military actions or wars in Nicaragua, Angola, Cuba, Laos and Indochina;
- Planted false stories in the local media;
- Framed political opponents for crimes, atrocities, political statements and embarrassments that they did not commit;
- Spied on thousands of American citizens, in defiance of Congressional law;
- Smuggled Nazi war criminals and weapon scientists into the U.S., unpunished, for their use in the Cold War;
- Created organizations like the World Anti-Communist League, which became filled with ex-Nazis, Nazi sympathizers, Italian
terrorists, Japanese fascists, racist Afrikaaners, Latin American death squad leaders, CIA agents and other extreme right-wing
- Conducted Operation MK-ULTRA, a mind-control experiment that gave LSD and other drugs to Americans against their will
or without their knowledge, causing some to commit suicide;
- Penetrated and disrupted student antiwar organizations;
- Kept friendly and extensive working relations with the Mafia;
- Actively traded in drugs around the world since the 1950s to fund its operations. The Contra/crack scandal is only the
tip of the iceberg –- other notorious examples include Southeast Asia’s Golden Triangle and Noreiga’s Panama.
- Had their fingerprints all over the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., and
Malcom X. Even if the CIA is not responsible for these killings, the sheer amount of CIA involvement in these cases demands
- And then routinely lied to Congress about all of the above.
The Association for Responsible Dissent estimates
that by 1987, 6 million people had died as a result of CIA covert operations. (4
) Former State Department
official William Blum correctly calls this an "American Holocaust."
We should note that the CIA gets away with this because it is not accountable to democratic government. Former CIA officer
Philip Agee put it best: "The CIA is the President's secret army." Prior to 1975, the agency answered only to the President
(creating all the usual problems of authoritarianism). And because the CIA’s activities were secret, the President rarely
had to worry about public criticism and pressure. After the 1975 Church hearings, Congress tried to create congressional oversight
of the CIA, but this has failed miserably. One reason is that the congressional oversight committee is a sham, filled with
Cold Warriors, conservatives, businessmen, and even ex-CIA personnel.
The Business Origins of CIA Crimes
Although many people think that the CIA’s primary mission during the Cold War was to "deter communism," Noam Chomksy
correctly points out that its real mission was "deterring democracy." From corrupting elections to overthrowing democratic
governments, from assassinating elected leaders to installing murderous dictators, the CIA has virtually always replaced democracy
with dictatorship. It didn’t help that the CIA was run by businessmen, whose hostility towards democracy is legendary.
The reason they overthrew so many democracies is because the people usually voted for policies that multi-national corporations
didn't like: land reform, strong labor unions, nationalization of their industries, and greater regulation protecting workers,
consumers and the environment.
So the CIA’s greatest "successes" were usually more pro-corporate than anti-communist. Citing a communist threat,
the CIA helped overthrow the democratically elected Mohammed Mussadegh government in Iran in 1953. But there was no communist
threat — the Soviets stood back and watched the coup from afar. What really happened was that Mussadegh threatened
to nationalize British and American oil companies in Iran. Consequently, the CIA and MI6 toppled Mussadegh and replaced him
with a puppet government, headed by the Shah of Iran and his murderous secret police, SAVAK. The reason why the Ayatollah
Khomeini and his revolutionaries took 52 Americans hostage in Tehran in 1979 was because the CIA had helped SAVAK torture
and murder their people.
Another "success" was the CIA’s overthrow of the democratically elected government of Jacabo Arbenz in Guatemala
in 1954. Again, there was no communist threat. The real threat was to Guatemala’s United Fruit Company, a Rockefeller-owned
firm whose stockholders included CIA Director Allen Dulles. Arbenz threatened to nationalize the company, albeit with generous
compensation. In response, the CIA initiated a coup that overthrew Arbenz and installed the murderous dictator Castillo Armas.
For four decades, CIA-backed dicatators would torture and murder hundreds of thousands of leftists, union members and others
who would fight for a more equitable distribution of the country’s resources.
Another "success" story was Chile. In 1973, the country’s democratically elected leader, Salvadore Allende, nationalized
foreign-owned interests, like Chile’s lucrative copper mines and telephone system. International Telephone & Telegraph
(ITT) offered the CIA $1 million to overthrow Allende — which the CIA allegedly refused — but paid $350,000 to
his political opponents. The CIA responded with a coup that murdered Allende and replaced him with a brutal tyrant, General
Augusto Pinochet. Pinochet tortured and murdered thousands of leftists, union members and political opponents as economists
trained at the University of Chicago under Milton Friedman installed a "free market" economy. Since then, income inequality
has soared higher in Chile than anywhere else in Latin America.
Even when the communist threat was real, the CIA first and foremost took care of the elite. In testimony before Congress
in the early 50s, it artificially inflated Soviet military capabilities. A notorious example was the "bomber gap" that later
turned out to be grossly exaggerated. Another was "Team B," a group of hawkish CIA analysts who seriously distorted Soviet
military data. These scare tactics worked. Congress awarded giant defense contracts to the U.S. military-industrial complex.
And not even the fall of the Soviet Union and the demise of American defense contracts have stopped the CIA from serving
the elite. Journalist Robert Dreyfuss writes:
Since the end of the Cold War, Washington has been abuzz with talk about using the CIA for economic espionage. Stripped
of euphemism, economic espionage simply means that American spies would target foreign companies, such as Toyota, Nissan and
Honda, and then covertly pass stolen trade secrets and technology to U.S. corporate executives. (5)
this isn’t bad enough, a worse problem arises in that the CIA doesn’t hand over this technology to every
American auto-related company, but only the Big Three: Ford, Chrysler and General Motors.
In a 1975 interview, Ex-CIA agent Philip Agee summed up his personal observations of the agency:
To the people who work for it, the CIA is known as The Company. The Big Business mentality pervades everything. Agents,
for instance, are called assets. The man in charge of the United Kingdom desk is said to have the "U.K. account"…
American multinational corporations have built up colossal interests all over the world, and you can bet your ass that
wherever you find U. S. business interests, you also find the CIA… The multinational corporations want a peaceful status
quo in countries where they have investments, because that gives them undisturbed access to cheap raw materials, cheap labor
and stable markets for their finished goods. The status quo suits bankers, because their money remains secure and multiplies.
And, of course, the status quo suits the small ruling groups the CIA supports abroad, because all they want is to keep themselves
on top of the socioeconomic pyramid and the majority of their people on the bottom. But do you realize what being on the bottom
means in most parts of the world? Ignorance, poverty, often early death by starvation or disease…
Remember, the CIA is an instrument of the President; it only carries out policy. And, like everyone else, the President
has to respond to forces in the society he's trying to lead, right? In America, the most powerful force is Big Business, and
American Big Business has a vested interest in the Cold War. (6)
The CIA had no trouble recruiting elites who sought a more exciting life. Between 1948 and 1959, more than 40,000 American
individuals and companies acted as sources for the U.S. intelligence community. (7) Let’s look at each
area of recruitment, and see how they enabled the CIA to conduct its crimes:
The CIA co-opted big business right from the start, beginning with the most famous billionaire of the time: Howard Hughes.
Hughes had inherited his father’s million-dollar tool and die company at age 19. Anxious to expand his fortune, he made
a conscientious decision "to go where the money is" — namely, government. With a few well-placed bribes, Hughes secured
defense contracts to build military planes. The result was the Hughes Aircraft company. By 1940, he had also acquired a controlling
interest in Trans World Airlines. His government connections and international airline soon caught the attention of the CIA,
and the two began a lifelong relationship. Hughes, whom the CIA dubbed "The Stockbroker," became the agency’s largest
contractor. Not only did he let the CIA use his business firms as fronts, but he also funded countless CIA operations. Perhaps
the most notorious was Operation Jennifer, an allegedly failed attempt to recover nuclear codes from a sunken Soviet submarine.
Hughes’ right-hand security man, Robert Maheu, was a CIA agent who at one time represented the CIA in negotiations with
the Mafia to assassinate Fidel Castro.
The CIA’s contacts with big business quickly spread. The agency showed a preference for international companies,
public relations firms, media companies, law offices, banks, financiers and stockbrokers. The CIA didn’t limit its activities
to recruiting businessmen; sometimes the CIA bought or created entire companies outright. One benefit of co-opting big business
was that the CIA was able to create a secret source of funds other than from government. With stock portfolios multiplying
their profits, it’s impossible now to say how flush the CIA really is. If Congress ever cut off funds for a mission,
the business fraternity could easily replace them, either by donations or even setting up profitable businesses in the target
country. In fact, this is precisely what happened during the Iran/Contra scandal.
By allying itself with the business community, the CIA received the funds and ability it needed to remove itself from democratic
Journalism is a perfect cover for CIA agents. People talk freely to journalists, and few think suspiciously of a journalist
aggressively searching for information. Journalists also have power, influence and clout. Not surprisingly, the CIA began
a mission in the late 1940s to recruit American journalists on a wide scale, a mission it dubbed Operation MOCKINGBIRD. The
agency wanted these journalists not only to relay any sensitive information they discovered, but also to write anti-communist,
pro-capitalist propaganda when needed.
The instigators of MOCKINGBIRD were Frank Wisner, Allan Dulles, Richard Helms and Philip Graham. Graham was the husband
of Katherine Graham, today’s publisher of the Washington Post. In fact, it was the Post’s ties to
the CIA that allowed it to grow so quickly after the war, both in readership and influence. (8)
MOCKINGBIRD was extraordinarily successful. In no time, the agency had recruited at least 25 media organizations to disseminate
CIA propaganda. At least 400 journalists would eventually join the CIA payroll, according to the CIA’s testimony before
a stunned Church Committee in 1975. (The committee felt the true number was considerably higher.) The names of those recruited
reads like a Who's Who of journalism:
- Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post)
- William Paley (President, CBS)
- Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine)
- Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)
- Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star)
- Hal Hendrix (Pulitzer Prize winner, Miami News)
- Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal)
- James Copley (Copley News Services)
- Joseph Harrison (Editor, Christian Science Monitor)
- C.D. Jackson (Fortune)
- Walter Pincus (Reporter, Washington Post)
- Associated Press
- United Press International
- Hearst Newspapers
- Newsweek magazine
- Mutual Broadcasting System
- Miami Herald
- Old Saturday Evening Post
- New York Herald-Tribune
Perhaps no newspaper is more important to the CIA than the Washington Post
one of the nation’s most right-wing dailies. Its location in the nation’s capitol enables the paper to maintain
valuable personal contacts with leading intelligence, political and business figures. Unlike other newspapers, the Post
operates its own bureaus around the world, rather than relying on AP wire services. Owner Philip Graham was a military intelligence
officer in World War II, and later became close friends with CIA figures like Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Desmond FitzGerald
and Richard Helms. He inherited the Post
by marrying Katherine Graham, whose father owned it.
After Philip’s suicide in 1963, Katharine Graham took over the Post. Seduced by her husband’s world
of government and espionage, she expanded her newspaper’s relationship with the CIA. In a 1988 speech before CIA officials
at Langley, Virginia, she stated:
We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things that the general public does not need to know and shouldn’t.
I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide
whether to print what it knows.
This quote has since become a classic among CIA critics for its belittlement of democracy
and its admission that there is a political agenda behind the Post’s
Ben Bradlee was the Post’s managing editor during most of the Cold War. He worked in the U.S. Paris embassy
from 1951 to 1953, where he followed orders by the CIA station chief to place propaganda in the European press. (9)
Most Americans incorrectly believe that Bradlee personifies the liberal slant of the Post, given his role in publishing
the Pentagon Papers and the Watergate investigations. But neither of these two incidents are what they seem. The Post merely
published the Pentagon Papers after The New York Times already had, because it wanted to appear competitive. As for
Watergate, we’ll examine the CIA’s reasons for wanting to bring down Nixon in a moment. Someone once asked Bradlee:
"Does it irk you when The Washington Post is made out to be a bastion of slanted liberal thinkers instead of champion
journalists just because of Watergate?" Bradlee responded: "Damn right it does!" (10)
It would be impossible to elaborate in this short space even the most important examples of the CIA/media alliance. Sig
Mickelson was a CIA asset the entire time he was president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961. Later he went on to become president
of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, two major outlets of CIA propaganda.
The CIA also secretly bought or created its own media companies. It owned 40 percent of the Rome Daily American at
a time when communists were threatening to win the Italian elections. Worse, the CIA has bought many domestic media
companies. A prime example is Capital Cities, created in 1954 by CIA businessman William Casey (who would later become Reagan’s
CIA director). Another founder was Lowell Thomas, a close friend and business contact with CIA Director Allen Dulles. Another
founder was CIA businessman Thomas Dewey. By 1985, Capital Cities had grown so powerful that it was able to buy an entire
TV network: ABC.
For those who believe in "separation of press and state," the very idea that the CIA has secret propaganda outlets throughout
the media is appalling. The reason why America was so oblivious to CIA crimes in the 40s and 50s was because the media willingly
complied with the agency. Even today, when the immorality of the CIA should be an open-and-shut case, "debate" about the issue
rages in the media. Here is but one example:
In 1996, The San Jose Mercury News published an investigative report suggesting that the CIA had sold crack in Los
Angeles to fund the Contra war in Central America. A month later, three of the CIA’s most important media allies —
The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times — immediately leveled their guns at
the Mercury report and blasted away in an attempt to discredit it. Who wrote the Post article? Walter Pincus, longtime
CIA journalist. The dangers here are obvious.
By the early 50s, CIA Director Allen Dulles had staffed the CIA almost exclusively with Ivy League graduates, especially
from Yale. (A disproportionate number of CIA figures, like George Bush, come from Yale’s "Skull and Crossbones" Society.)
CIA recruiters also approached thousands of other professors to work in place at their universities on a part-time, contract
basis. Not stopping at recruiting scholars, the agency would go on to create several departments at elite universities, including
Harvard's Russian Research Center and the Center for International Studies at MIT.
Although most academics were supportive of the CIA in the 50s, most were unaware of its abuses. In the 60s, academia would
become outraged to learn that anti-communist organizations like the National Student Association were actually creations of
the CIA. The most audacious CIA front was the Congress for Cultural Freedom, an organization that attracted liberal, freethinking
artists and intellectuals who nonetheless deplored communism.
By the late 60s and 70s, growing reports of CIA crimes and atrocities had deeply alienated academia. Scholars were further
troubled to learn that the CIA had penetrated and disrupted student antiwar groups. Unlike business and the media, academia
overwhelmingly denounced the CIA after the Vietnam era. This eventually forced the CIA to turn to new places to find their
analysts and scholars. The most important source was the conservative think-tank movement, which it helped to create. More
on this later.
The Roman Catholic Church
Although the CIA began as a mostly Protestant organization, Roman Catholics quickly came to dominate the new covert-action
wing in 1948. All were staunchly conservative, fiercely anti-communist and socially elite. Just a few of the many Catholic
operatives included future CIA directors William Colby, William Casey, and John McCone. Another well-known personality from
this period was William F. Buckley, Jr., editor of the National Review and gadfly host of TV’s Firing Line.
Buckley, it turns out, served as a CIA agent in Mexico City, and his experiences there served as fodder for his Blackford
Oakes spy novels.
There were several reasons for this influx of Catholic elites. First, Wisner (himself a Wall Street lawyer) had an extensive
and glamorous circle of friends to recruit from. Second, Italy was in constant crisis in the 1940s, both during World War
II and after. Throughout this troubled period, the American intelligence community’s greatest ally in Italy was the
Roman Catholic Church.
The Roman Catholic Church, of course, is one of the most anti-communist organizations in the world. The Marxist doctrine
of atheism threatens Catholic theology, and its equality threatens the Church’s strict tradition of hierarchy and authoritarianism.
When Hitler invaded Communist Russia, the Vatican openly approved. Jesuit Michael Serafian wrote: "It cannot be denied that
[Pope] Pius XII's closest advisors for some time regarded Hitler's armoured divisions as the right hand of God." (11)
But Hitler persecuted Catholics as well, and ultimately drove the Church to the Americans. In 1943, the Vatican reached
a secret agreement with OSS Chief Donovan — himself a devout Catholic — to let the Holy See become the center
of Allied spy operations in Italy. Donovan considered the Church to be one of his prize intelligence assets, given its global
power, membership and contacts. He cultivated this alliance by sending America’s most prestigious Catholics to the Vatican
to establish rapport and forge an alliance.
After the war, half of Europe lay under Communist control, and the Italian communist party threatened to win the 1948 elections.
The prospect of communism ruling over the heart of Catholicism terrified the Vatican. Once again, American intelligence gathered
their most prestigious Catholics to strengthen ties with the Vatican. Because this was the first mission of the new covert
action division, the American Catholic agents acquired positions of power early on, and would dominate covert operations for
the rest of the Cold War.
At a public level, the U.S. government sunk $350 million in social and military aid into Italy to sway the vote. On a secret
level, Wisner spent $10 million in black budget funds to steal the elections. This included disseminating propaganda, beating
up left-wing politicians, intimidating voters and disrupting leftist parties. The dirty tricks worked — the Communists
lost, and the Catholic Americans’ success permanently secured their power within the CIA.
The Knights of Malta (12)
The Roman Catholic Church did not forget the American agents who had saved them from both Nazism and Communism. It rewarded
them by making them Knights of Malta, or members of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM).
SMOM is one of the oldest and most elite religious orders in the Catholic Church. Until recently, it limited its membership
to Italians and foreign heads of state. In 1927, however, an exception was made for the United States, given its emerging
status as a world power. SMOM opened an American branch, awarding knighthood or damehood to several American Catholic business
tycoons. This group was so conservative that one, John Raskob, the Chairman of General Motors, actually became involved in
an aborted military plot to remove Franklin Roosevelt from the White House. SMOM has also been embarrassed by knighting or
giving awards to countless people who later turned out to be Nazi war criminals. This is the sort of culture that thrives
within the leadership of SMOM.
Officially, the Knights of Malta are a global charity organization. But beginning in the 1940s, knighthood was granted
to countless CIA agents, and the organization has become a front for intelligence operations. SMOM is ideal for this kind
of activity, because it is recognized as the world’s only landless sovereignty, and members enjoy diplomatic immunity.
This allows agents and supplies to pass through customs without interference from the host country. Such privileges enabled
the Knights of Malta to become a major supplier of "humanitarian aid" to the Contras during their war in the 1980s.
A partial list of the Knights and Dames of Malta reads like a Who’s Who of American Catholicism:
- William Casey – CIA Director.
- John McCone – CIA Director.
- William Colby – CIA Director.
- William Donovan – OSS Director. Donovan was given an especially prestigious form of knighthood that has only
been given to a hundred other men in history.
- Frank Shakespeare – Director of such propaganda organizations as the U.S. Information Agency, Radio Free Europe
and Radio Liberty. Also executive vice-president of CBS-TV and vice-chairman of RKO General Inc. He is currently chairman
of the board of trustees at the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank.
- William Simon – Treasury Secretary under President Nixon. In the private sector, he has become one of America’s
400 richest individuals by working in international finance. Today he is the President of the John M. Olin Foundation, a major
funder of right-wing think tanks.
- William F. Buckley, Jr. – CIA agent, conservative pundit and mass media personality.
- James Buckley – William’s brother, head of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty.
- Clare Boothe Luce - The grand dame of the Cold War was also a Dame of Malta. She was a popular playwright and the
- of the publishing tycoon Henry Luce, who cofounded Time magazine.
- Francis X Stankard - CEO of the international division of Chase Manhattan Bank, a Rockefeller institution. (Nelson
Rockefeller was also a major CIA figure.)
- John Farrell – President, U.S. Steel
- Lee Iacocca – Chairman, General Motors
- William S. Schreyer – Chairman, Merrill Lynch.
- Richard R. Shinn – Chairman, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
- Joseph Kennedy – Founder of the Kennedy empire.
- Baron Hilton – Owner, Hilton Hotel chain.
- Patrick J. Frawley Jr. – Heir, Schick razor fortune. Frawley is a famous funder of right-wing Catholic causes,
such as the Christian Anti-Communist Crusade.
- Ralph Abplanalp - Aerosol magnate.
- Martin F. Shea - Executive vice president of Morgan Guaranty Trust.
- Joseph Brennan - Chairman of the executive committee of the Emigrant Savings Bank of New York.
- J. Peter Grace – President, W.R. Grace Company. He
- was a key figure in Operation Paperclip, which brought Nazi scientists and spies to the U.S. Many were war criminals
whose atrocities were excused in their service to the CIA.
- Thomas Bolan – Of Saxe, Bacon and Bolan, the law firm of Senator McCarthy's deceased aide Roy Cohn.
- Bowie Kuhn – Baseball Comissioner
- Cardinal John O'Connor – Extreme right-wing leader among American Catholics, and fervent abortion opponent.
- Cardinal Francis Spellman – The "American Pope" was at one time the most powerful Catholic in America, an arch-conservative
and a rabid anti-communist.
- Cardinal Bernard Law - One of the highest-ranking conservatives in the American church.
- Alexander Haig – Secretary of State under President Reagan.
- Admiral James D. Watkins – Hard-line chief of naval operations under President Reagan.
– Senator (R–Al).
- Pete Domenici – Senator (R-New Mexico).
- Walter J. Hickel - Governor of Alaska and secretary of the interior.
When this group gets together, obviously,
the topics are spying, business and politics.
The CIA has also used other religious and charity organizations as fronts. For example, John F. Kennedy -- another anticommunist
Roman Catholic who greatly expanded covert operations -- created the U.S. Peace Corps to serve as cover for CIA operatives.
The CIA has also made extensive use of missionaries, with the blessings of many right-wing, anticommunist Christian denominations.
But the World Grows Wise…
It was only a matter of time before other nations caught on to these fronts. They learned that when the CIA comes to their
countries to commit their crimes and atrocities, they come disguised as American journalists, businessmen, missionaries and
charity volunteers. Unfortunately, foreigners are now targeting these professions as hostile. In Lebanon, terrorists held
U.S. journalist Terry Anderson hostage for nearly seven years, on the not unreasonable assumption that he was a spy. Whether
or not this was true is beside the point. The CIA has put all Americans abroad at risk, whether they are CIA agents or not.
In hearings before the Senate in 1996, many organizations urged Congress to stop using their professions as CIA cover. Don
Argue of the National Association of Evangelicals testified: "Such use of missionary agents for covert activities by the CIA
would be unethical and immoral." (13)
From the Cold War to the Class War
As noted above, academia was the first major institution to denounce the crimes of the CIA. Why? One reason is that scholars
conduct their own extensive research into world affairs, so naturally they were the first to learn the truth. This is the
main reason why protest against the Vietnam War and the CIA erupted first among students on the nation’s campuses. By
the end of the Vietnam War, the CIA had suffered a "brain drain" as its academic allies became its most articulate, passionate
and eloquent critics.
The social revolutions of the 60s terrified the CIA. James Jesus Angleton, chief of counter-intelligence and a truly paranoid
man, was convinced the Soviets had masterminded the entire antiwar movement. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover shared his conviction.
The CIA had always spied on student groups throughout the 60s, but in 1968 President Johnson dramatically stepped up the effort
with Operation CHAOS. This initially called for 50 CIA agents to go undercover as student radicals, penetrate their antiwar
organizations and root out the Russian spies who were causing the rebellion. Tellingly, they never found a single spy. The
agents also began a campaign of wire-tapping, mail-opening, burglary, deception, intimidation and disruption against thousands
of protesting American civilians.
By the time Operation CHAOS wound down in 1973, the CIA had spied on 7,000 Americans, 1,000 organizations and traded information
on more than 300,000 persons with various law agencies. (14) When academia learned of this, its outrage grew.
The loss of academia was only the first blow for the CIA. Other disasters quickly followed; in the early 70s, the CIA was
trying desperately to stave off a growing number of scandals. The first was Watergate.
The CIA’s fingerprints were all over Watergate. First, we should note the CIA had clear motives for helping oust
Nixon. He was the ultimate "outsider," a poor California Quaker who grew up feeling bitter resentment towards the elite "Eastern
establishment." Nixon, for all his arch-conservatism, was surprisingly liberal on economic issues, enfuriating businessmen
with statements like "We are all Keynesians now." He created a whole host of new agencies to regulate business, like the FDA,
EPA and OSHA. He signed the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, which forced businesses to clean up their toxic emissions. He
imposed price controls to fight inflation, and took the nation fully off the gold standard. Nixon also strengthened affirmative
action. Even his staffers were famously anti-elitist, like Kevin Philips, who would eventually write the bible on inequality
during the 1980s, The Politics of Rich and Poor. Add to this Nixon’s withdrawal from Vietnam and Détente with
China and the Soviet Union. Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, had not only tried to remove control of foreign
policy from the CIA, but had also taken measures to bring the CIA itself under control. Not surprisingly, Nixon and
his CIA Director, Richard Helms, couldn’t stand each other. (Nixon fired him for failing to cover up for Watergate.)
Clearly, Nixon was fighting at cross-purposes with the CIA and the nation’s elite.
As it turns out, the CIA had inside knowledge of Nixon’s dirty work. Nixon had created his own covert action team,
"The Committee to Reelect the President," more amusingly known by its acronym, CREEP. The team consisted of two CIA agents
— E. Howard Hunt and James McCord — as well as former FBI agent G. Gordon Liddy. They also employed four Cubans
with long CIA histories. In fact, a CIA front called the Mullen Company funded their activities, which ranged from disrupting
Democratic campaigns to laundering Nixon’s illegal campaign contributions.
The CIA not only had intimate knowledge of Nixon’s crimes, but it also acted as though it wanted the world to know
them. When the FBI began investigating Watergate, Nixon tried using the CIA to cover up for him. At first the CIA half-heartedly
complied, telling the FBI that the investigation would endanger CIA operations in Mexico. But a few weeks later it gave the
FBI a green light again to proceed again with their investigation.
Furthermore, Watergate was exposed by the CIA’s main newspaper in America, The Washington Post. One of the
two journalists who investigated the scandal, Robert Woodward, had only recently become a journalist. Previously Woodward
had worked as a Naval intelligence liaison to the White House, privy to some of the nation’s highest secrets. He would
later write a sympathetic portrait of CIA Director Bill Casey in a book entitled Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA.
It was Woodward who personally knew and interviewed "Deep Throat," the unnamed source who revealed inside information on Nixon’s
activities. Many Watergate researchers consider one of Woodward’s old intelligence contacts to be a prime candidate
for Deep Throat. (15)
Despite all the facts of CIA involvement, Woodward and Bernstein made virtually no mention of the CIA in their Watergate
reporting. Even during Senate hearings on Watergate, the CIA somehow managed to stay out of the spotlight. In 1974, the House
would clear the CIA of any involvement in Watergate.
The CIA was not as lucky in 1974, when the Senate held hearings on James Jesus Angleton’s illegal surveillance of
American citizens. These disclosures resulted in his firing. But that was nothing compared to the 1975 Church Committee. This
Senate investigation looked into virtually every type of CIA crime, from assassination to secret war to manipulating the domestic
media. The "reforms" that resulted from these hearings were mostly cosmetic, but the details that emerged shattered the CIA’s
reputation forever. Interestingly enough, the two Senators who held these hearings — Frank Church and Otis Pike —
were both defeated for reelection, despite a 98 percent reelection rate for incumbents.
The CIA wasn’t the only conservative institution that found itself embattled in the early 70s. This was a bad time
for conservatives everywhere. America had lost the war in Vietnam. U.S. corporations had to cope with the rise of OPEC. The
anti-poverty programs of Roosevelt’s New Deal and Johnson’s Great Society were causing a major redistribution
of wealth. And Nixon was making things worse with his own anti-poverty and regulatory programs. Between 1960 and 1973, these
efforts cut poverty in half, from 22 to 11 percent. Meanwhile, between 1965 and 1976, the richest 1 percent had gone from
owning 37 percent of America’s wealth to only 22 percent. (16)
At a 1973 Conference Board meeting of top American business leaders, executives declared: "We are fighting for our lives,"
"We are fighting a delaying action," and "If we don’t take action now, we will see our own demise. We will evolve into
another social democracy." (17)
The CIA to the rescue
In the mid-1970s, at this historic low point in American conservatism, the CIA began a major campaign to turn corporate
They did this in several ways. First, they helped create numerous foundations to finance their domestic operations. Even
before 1973, the CIA had co-opted the most famous ones, like the Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations. But after 1973,
they created more. One of their most notorious recruits was billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife. During World War II, Scaife's
father served in the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA. By his mid-twenties, both of Scaife's parents had died, and he inherited
a fortune under four foundations: the Carthage Foundation, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the Scaife Family Foundations and
the Allegheny Foundation. In the early 1970s, Scaife was encouraged by CIA agent Frank Barnett to begin investing his fortune
to fight the "Soviet menace." (18) From 1973 to 1975, Scaife ran Forum World Features, a foreign news service used
as a front to disseminate CIA propaganda around the world. Shortly afterwards he began donating millions to fund the New Right.
Scaife's CIA roots are typical of those who head the new conservative foundations. By 1994 the most active were:
- Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
- Carthage Foundation
- Earhart Foundation
- Charles G. Koch
- David H. Koch
- Claude R. Lambe
- Philip M. McKenna
- J.M. Foundation
- John M. Olin Foundation
- Henry Salvatori Foundation
- Sarah Scaife Foundation
- Smith Richardson Foundation
Between 1992 and 1994, these foundations gave $210 million to conservative causes.
Here is the breakdown of their donations:
- $88.9 million for conservative scholarships;
- $79.2 million to enhance a national infrastructure of think tanks and advocacy groups;
- $16.3 million for alternative media outlets and watchdog groups;
- $10.5 million for conservative pro-market law firms;
- $9.3 million for regional and state think tanks and advocacy groups;
- $5.4 million to "organizations working to transform the nations social views and giving practices of the nation's religious
and philanthropic leaders." (19)
The political machine they built is broad and comprehensive, covering
every aspect of the political fight. It includes right-wing departments and chairs in the nation’s top universities,
think tanks, public relations firms, media companies, fake grassroots organizations that pressure Congress (irreverently known
as "Astroturf" movements), "Roll-out-the-vote" machines, pollsters, fax networks, lobbyist organizations, economic seminars
for the nation’s judges, and more. And because corporations are the richest sector of society, their greater financing
overwhelms similar efforts by Democrats.
Besides creating foundations, the CIA helped organize the business community. There have always been special interest groups
representing business, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, and the CIA has long
been involved with them. However, after 1973, a spate of powerful new groups would come into existence, like the Business
Roundtable and the Trilateral Commission. These organizations quickly became powerhouses in promoting the business agenda.
Their efforts clearly succeeded. With the 1975 SUN-PAC decision, corporations persuaded government to legalize corporate
Political Action Committees (the lobbyist organizations that bribe our government). By 1992, corporations formed 67 percent
of all PACs, and they donated 79 percent of all campaign contributions to political parties. (20) In two
landmark elections — 1980 and 1994 — corporations gave heavily and one-sidedly to Republicans, turning one or
both houses of Congress over to the GOP. Democratic incumbents were shocked by the threat of being rolled completely out of
power, so they quietly shifted to the right on economic issues, even though they continued a public façade of liberalism.
Corporations went ahead and donated to Democratic incumbents in all other elections, but only as long as they abandoned the
interests of workers, consumers, minorities and the poor. As expected, the new pro-corporate Congress passed laws favoring
the rich: between 1975 and 1992, the amount of national household wealth owned by the richest 1 percent soared from 22 to
42 percent. (21)
The CIA also helped create the conservative think tank movement. Prior to the 70s, think tanks spanned the political spectrum,
with moderate think tanks receiving three times as much funding as conservative ones. At these early think tanks, scholars
typically brainstormed for creative solutions to policy problems. This would all change after the rise of conservative foundations
in the early 70s. The Heritage Foundation opened its doors in 1973, the recipient of $250,000 in seed money from the Coors
Foundation. A flood of conservative think tanks followed shortly thereafter, and by 1980 they overwhelmed the scene. The new
think tanks turned out to be little more than propaganda mills, rigging studies to "prove" that their corporate sponsors needed
tax breaks, deregulation and other favors from government.
Of course, think-tank studies are useless without publicity, and here the CIA proved especially valuable. Using propaganda
techniques it had perfected at the Voice of America and Radio Free Europe, the CIA and its allies turned American AM radio
into a haven for conservative talk show hosts. Yes — Rush Limbaugh uses the same propaganda techniques that Muscovites
once heard from Voice of America. The CIA has also developed countless other media outlets, like Capital Cities (which eventually
bought ABC), major PR firms like Hill & Knowlton, and of course, all the Agency’s connections in the national news
The following is a typical example of how the "New Media" operates. As most political observers know, the Republicans suffer
from a "gender gap," in which women prefer Democrats by huge majorities. This is, in fact, why Clinton has twice won the presidency.
But, curiously enough, as the 90s progressed, conservative female pundits began popping up everywhere in the media. Hard-right
pundits like Ann Coulter, Kellyanne Fitzpatrick, Laura Ingraham, Barbara Olson, Melinda Sidak, Anita Blair and Whitney Adams
conditioned us to the idea of the conservative woman. This phenomenon was no accident. It turns out that Richard Mellon Scaife
donated $450,000 over three years to the Independent Women's Forum, a booking agency that heavily seeds such female conservative
pundits into the media. (23)
The most obvious criticism of the New Overclass is that their political machine is undemocratic. Using subversive techniques
once aimed at communists, and with all the money they ever need to succeed, the Overclass undemocratically controls our government,
our media, and even a growing part of academia. These institutions in turn allow the Overclass to control the supposedly "free"
market. It doesn't win all the time, of course — witness Bill Clinton's impeachment trial — but it does score
an endless string of other victories elsewhere, all to the detriment of workers, consumers, women, minorities and the poor.
We need to fight it with everything we've got.
Myth: There’s no "vast right wing conspiracy" to get Clinton.
Myth: Conservative think tanks are the answer to liberal academia.
A Timeline of CIA Atrocities.
1. Mind Manipulators, Scheflin and Opton. p.241.
2. Captain George White in a letter to Dr. Sidney Gottlieb.
3. All history concerning CIA intervention in foreign countries is summarized from William Blum’s
encyclopedic work, Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions since World War II (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1995). Sources for domestic CIA operations come from Jonathan Vankin and John Whalen’s The 60 Greatest Conspiracies
of All Time (Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press, 1997). Information about CIA drug running can be found at http://www.magnet.ch/serendipity/cia/blum1.html
4. Coleman McCarthy, "The Consequences of Covert Tactics" Washington Post, December 13, 1987.
5. Robert Dreyfuss, "Company Spies," Mother Jones. Website: http://www.mojones.com/mother_jones/MJ94/dreyfuss.html
6. Philip Agee: The Playboy Interview. Website: http://www.connix.com/~harry/agee.htm or try
7. Lara Shohet, "Intelligence, Academia and Industry," The Final Report of the Snyder Commission,
Edward Cheng and Diane C. Snyder, eds., (Princeton Unversity: The Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs,
January 1997). Website: http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/snyder/academia.htm
9. Deborah Davis, Katharine the Great and the Washington Post, 2nd ed. (Bethesda MD: National Press,
10. "Forum for Ben Bradlee," Watergate 25. Website: http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/zforum/97/bradlee.htm
11. Lewy, Guenter, The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany (London and New York, 1964), pp. 249-250.
12. National Catholic Reporter, Jan 89, Mar 89, Apr 89, May 89, "Nazis, the Vatican and the CIA,"
Covert Action Information Bulletin, Winter 1986, Number 25 Website: http://www.mosquitonet.com/~prewett/
13. Anthony Collings, "Journalists tell Senate they want no CIA ties," CNN, July 18, 1996. Website:
14. Morton Halperin, et al, eds., The Lawless State (New York: Penguin, 1976), p. 153.
15. Jim Hougan, Secret Agenda: Watergate, Deep Throat and the CIA.
16. Edward N. Wolff, "How the Pie is Sliced" The American Prospect no. 22 (Summer 1995),
pp. 58-64. Website: http://epn.org/prospect/22/22wolf.html
17. Quoted in Leonard Silk and David Vogel, Ethics and Profits (New York: Simon & Schuster,
1976), pp. 44-47.
18. Karen Rothmyer, "The man behind the mask," Salon, April 7, 1998.
19. Study conducted by National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, July 1997, as reported by
the National Education Association. Website: http://www.nea.org/publiced/paycheck/paychkf.html
20. Center for Responsive Politics, Washington D.C., 1993.
22. For CIA involvement in Capital Cities/ABC, see Dennis Mazzocco, Networks of Power (Boston:
South End Press, 1994). For CIA involvement in the PR industry, see John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton, Toxic Sludge is Good
for You! (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), pp. 49-51,153,157,160-63.
23. Jonathon Broder and Murray Waas, [Untitled] Salon, April 20, 1998. Website: http://www.salonmag.com/news/1998/04/20news.html