Current Wars: Iraq

To read the posts on the other issues please use the links named after the different page-subtitles.

For additional information see also the sections
__________________

News & Comments

__________________

Important Reports

__________________

The Axis Of Evil


Current Wars
 
the following links lead to reports on the related countries

For Middle East see "Israel & ME" in the Main Navigation or

Israel & The Middle East Conflict

__________________

Afghanistan

_______________
Iraq

VIDEO Saddam - America's Best Enemy / Fisk: A Dictator Created Then Destroyed By America, He Takes His Secrets To The Grave. Our Complicity Dies With Him

3-PART VIDEO Real War On Terror

Iraq: The Unseen War

VIDEO: Iraq's Missing Billions

If America Left Iraq - The case for cutting and running

Another Video and it is Worse

Video: Shocking and Awful - The Real Face of The U.S. Occupation Of Iraq

VIDEO: 'Fallujah - The Hidden Massacre' Italian RAI News24 TV To Broadcast Evidence Of US Use Of Chemical Weapons On Iraqi Civilians...

_______________
Series

Two Sides Of War: Reality Of War In Iraq Part 1

Two Sides Of War: Reality Of War In Iraq Part 2

_______________
5 Part Series
Analysis: American Violence In Iraq: Necrophilia Or Savagery?

Analysis Part 1/5: Bully, Cheat, Kill, And Conquer

Analysis Part 2/5: Is Supporting The Troops, Patriotism, Dementia, Or Moral Dissolution?

Analysis Part 3/5: King Frederick's And George Bush's Troops

Analysis Part 4/5: Obedience, Defiance, And Conscience

Analysis Part 5/5: Creating Our Own Reality

_______________

BAL-LA AL MOUSS - The Iraqi Resistance Is Geared To Keep On Fighting For A Decade To Come

Answering President Bush: The armed confrontation is ongoing and growing until the liberation.

Studies Of Suicide Bombings Point Finger Back At Us

Video: Telling Lies and False Statements - Where Have All The Young Men Gone?

June, 2005 Video Release by the Iraqi Resistance - The Cowboys in Iraq

Al-Qaim-Hospital: Tragedy beyond Description, Snipers' Indiscriminate Killings: Testimonies of Civilian Casualties

Iraq is a Bloody no Man's Land. America has Failed to Win the War. But has it Lost it?

A Message From The "Iraq Resistance" Iraqi Resistance speech on videotape December 13 2004

The Lancet - Report: Mortality Before And After The 2003 Invasion Of Iraq - Cluster Sample Survey


World Areas of Concern
- Listed by Region

Potential Targets For US Intervention


Related Links

A World In Trouble

Country Briefings By Economist.com

The (CIA) World Factbook

Very Pissed Off Combat Veterans -- And Blueprints For Change By John McCarthy

The War on Terror -- Terrorism of War - Current Wars: Iraq -

Home | John McCarthy | CIA | Treason in Wartime | 1941-2001 | Science vs Religion | Reality Or Hoax? | Israel & ME | 9/11 - 3/11 - 7/7 -- Cui Bono? | New World Order | Lies vs Facts | War on Terror - Terrorism of War | Patriotism vs Humanity | War Crimes - Committed 'In All Our Names' | Enviroment & Lobbyism | FOIA & Whistleblowers vs Cover-Ups | Recruiting Lies vs Military Reality | From Democracy to Dictatorship | Empire Agenda | Media Coverage | International (War)Crimes Tribunals | Take Action! - Take Back America! | Summaries & Previews | Index Part 1 | Index Part 2 | Multimedia Index
Important note: Images and videos posted on this website are very graphic. Viewers discretion is strongly advised!

The Lancet: Report
 
Mortality Before And After The 2003 Invasion Of Iraq:
Cluster Sample Survey
 
Les Roberts, Riyadh Lafta, Richard Garfield, Jamal Khudhairi, Gilbert Burnham
 
Summary
 
Background
In March, 2003, military forces, mainly from the USA and the UK, invaded Iraq. We did a survey to compare mortality during the period of 146 months before the invasion with the 178 months after it.
 
Methods
A cluster sample survey was undertaken throughout Iraq during September, 2004. 33 clusters of 30 households each were interviewed about household composition, births, and deaths since January, 2002. In those households reporting deaths, the date, cause, and circumstances of violent deaths were recorded. We assessed the relative risk of death associated with the 2003 invasion and occupation by comparing mortality in the 178 months after the invasion with the 146-month period preceding it.
 
Findings
The risk of death was estimated to be 25-fold (95% CI 16–42) higher after the invasion when compared with the preinvasion period. Two-thirds of all violent deaths were reported in one cluster in the city of Falluja. If we exclude the Falluja data, the risk of death is 15-fold (11–23) higher after the invasion. We estimate that 98 000 more deaths than expected (8000–194 000) happened after the invasion outside of Falluja and far more if the outlier Falluja cluster is included. The major causes of death before the invasion were myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, and other chronic disorders whereas after the invasion violence was the primary cause of death. Violent deaths were widespread, reported in 15 of 33 clusters, and were mainly attributed to coalition forces.
Most individuals reportedly killed by coalition forces were women and children. The risk of death from violence in the period after the invasion was 58 times higher (95% CI 81–419) than in the period before the war.
 
Interpretation
Making conservative assumptions, we think that about 100 000 excess deaths, or more have happened since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Violence accounted for most of the excess deaths and air strikes from coalition forces accounted for most violent deaths. We have shown that collection of public-health information is possible even during periods of extreme violence. Our results need further verification and should lead to changes to reduce noncombatant deaths from air strikes.
 
Introduction
 
The number of Iraqis dying because of conflict or sanctions since the 1991 Gulf war is uncertain.[1,2] Claims ranging from a denial of increased mortality[3–7] to millions of excess deaths[8] have been made. The Coalition Provisional Authority and the Iraqi Ministry of Health have identified the halving of infant mortality as a major objective.[9] In the absence of any surveys, however, they have relied on Ministry of Health records. These data have indicated a decline in young child mortality since February, 2001, but because only a third of all deaths happen in hospitals, these data might not accurately represent trends.[10] No surveys or censusbased estimates of crude mortality have been undertaken in Iraq in more than a decade, and the last estimate of under-five mortality was from a UNICEF-sponsored demographic survey from 1999.[11,12] Morgue-based surveillance data indicate the postinvasion homicide rate is many times higher than the preinvasion rate. In Baghdad, a city of 5 million people, 3000 gunshot-related deaths happened in the first 8 months of 2004.[13] One project has kept a running estimate of press accounts of the number of Iraqi citizens killed by coalition forces: at present, the estimated range is 13 000–15 000 (http://www.iraqbodycount.net). Aside from the likelihood that press accounts are incomplete, this source does not record deaths that are the indirect result of the armed conflict. Other sources place the death toll much higher.[14] In a recent BBC article decrying the lack of a reliable civilian death count from the war in Iraq, Ken Roth of Human Rights Watch purports that it will not be possible “to come up with anything better than a good guess at the final civilian cost”.[14] In the present setting of insecurity and limited availability of health information, we undertook a nationwide survey to estimate mortality during the 146 months before the invasion (Jan 1, 2002, to March 18, 2003) and to compare it with the period from March 19, 2003, to the date of the interview, between Sept 8 and 20, 2004.
 
Methods
 
We designed the cross-sectional survey as a cohort study, with every cluster of households essentially matched to itself before and after the invasion of March, 2003.
Assuming a crude mortality rate of 10 per 1000 people per year, 95% confidence, and 80% power to detect a 65% increase in mortality, we derived a target sample size of 4300 individuals. We assumed that every household had seven individuals, and a sample of 30 clusters of 30 households each (n=6300) was chosen to provide a safety margin. We selected 33 clusters in anticipation that 10% of selected clusters would be too insecure to visit.
 
We obtained January, 2003, population estimates for each of Iraq’s 18 Governorates from the Ministry of Health. No attempt was made to adjust these numbers for recent displacement or immigration. We assigned 33 clusters to Governorates via systematic equal-step sampling from a randomly selected start. By this design, every cluster represents about 1/33 of the country, or 739 000 people, and is exchangeable with the others for analysis. Most communities visited consisted of fewer than 739 000 people. Thus, when referring to a specific cluster by name, this group of 30 households is representing 1/33 or 3% of the country, which may extend beyond the confines of that village or city.
 
During September, 2004, many roads were not under the control of the Government of Iraq or coalition forces.
Local police checkpoints were perceived by team members as target identification screens for rebel groups. To lessen risks to investigators, we sought to minimise travel distances and the number of Governorates to visit, while still sampling from all regions of the country. We did this by clumping pairs of Governorates. Pairs were adjacent Governorates that the Iraqi study team members believed to have had similar levels of violence and economic status during the preceding 3 years. The paired Governorates were:
Basrah and Missan, Dhi Qar and Qadisiyah, Najaf and Karbala, Salah ad Din and Tamin, Arbil and Sulaymaniya, and Dehuk and Ninawa.
 
All clusters were assigned to Governorates without regard to any security considerations. Then, for the six sets of paired Governorates, a second phase of cluster assignment took place. The populations of the two Governorates were added together, and a random number between 0 and the combined population was drawn. If the number chosen was between 0 and the population of the first Governorate, all clusters previously assigned to both clusters went to the first. Likewise, if the random number was higher than the first Governorate population estimate, the clusters for both were assigned to the second. Because the probability that clusters would be assigned to any given Governorate was proportional to the population size in both phases of the assignment, the sample remained a random national sample. This clumping of clusters was likely to increase the sum of the variance between mortality estimates of clusters and thus reduce the precision of the national mortality estimate. We deemed this acceptable since it reduced travel by a third. Table 1 presents cluster groupings and figure 1 shows the location of Governorates.
 

 

Estimated populations (millions)

Clusters initially assigned at random

Clusters visited after grouping process

Baghdad

5139
7
7
Ninawa (1)
2349
3
4
Dehuk (1)
0650
1
0
Sulaymaniya (2)
1100
2
3
Arbil (2)
1100
1
0
Tamin (3)
0703
1
0
Salah ad Din (3)
1099
2
3
Diala
1436
2
2
Anbar
1.261
1
1
Babil
1828
3
3
Karbala (4)
1047
1
3
Najaf (4)
1021
2
0
Wasit
0815
1
1
Qadisiyah (5)
0779
1
0
Dhi Qar (5)
1537
2

3

Muthanna
0514
0
0
Basrah (6)
1330
2
0
Missan (6)
0685
1
3

(Numbers in parentheses denote pairings of Governorates.)

 
Table 1: Estimated populations of Governorates (January, 2003) and assignment of clusters

We assigned clusters to individual communities within the Governorates by creating cumulative population lists for the Governorate and picking a random number between one and the Governorate population. Once a town, village, or urban neighbourhood was selected, the team drove to the edges of the area and stored the site coordinates in a global positioning system (GPS) unit. We assumed the population was living within a rectangle, with the dimensions corresponding to the distances spanned between the site coordinates stored in the GPS unit. The area was drawn as a map subdivided by increments of 100 m. A pair of random numbers was selected between zero and the number of 100 m increments on each axis, corresponding to some point in the village. The GPS unit was used to guide interviewers to the selected point. Once at that point, the nearest 30 households were visited.
 
The study teams included at least a team leader and one male and one female interviewer. Five of the six Iraqi interviewers were medical doctors. All six were fluent in English and Arabic. All interviewers participated in the revisions and two rounds of fieldtesting of the questionnaire. Data were recorded in English.
 
Households were informed about the purpose of the survey, were assured that their name would not be recorded, and told that there would be no benefits or penalties for refusing or agreeing to participate. We defined households as a group of people living together and sleeping under the same roof(s). If multiple families were living in the same building, they were regarded as one household unless they had separate entrances onto the street. If the household agreed to be interviewed, the interviewees were asked for the age and sex of every current household member. Respondents were also asked to describe the composition of their household on Jan 1, 2002, and asked about any births, deaths, or visitors who stayed in the household for more than 2 months. Periods of visitation, and individual periods of residence since a birth or before a death, were recorded to the nearest month. Interviewers asked about any discrepancies between the 2002 and 2004 household compositions not accounted for by reported births and deaths. When deaths occurred, the date, cause, and circumstances of violent deaths were recorded. When violent deaths were attributed to a faction in the conflict or to criminal forces, no further investigation into the death was made to respect the privacy of the family and for the safety of the interviewers. The deceased had to be living in the household at the time of death and for more than 2 months before to be considered a household death.
 
Within clusters, an attempt was made to confirm at least two reported non-infant deaths by asking to see the death certificate. Interviewers were initially reluctant to ask to see death certificates because this might have implied they did not believe the respondents, perhaps triggering violence. Thus, a compromise was reached for which interviewers would attempt to confirm at least two deaths per cluster. Confirmation was sought to ensure that a large fraction of the reported deaths were not fabrications. Death certificates usually did not exist for infant deaths and asking for such certificates would probably inflate the fraction of respondents who could not confirm reported deaths. The death certificates were requested at the end of the interview so that respondents did not know that confirmation would be sought as they reported deaths. We defined infant deaths as deaths happening in the first 365 days after birth. Violent deaths were defined as those brought about by the intentional acts of others.
 
For most clusters, the latitude and longitude was recorded. At the end of interviewing every 30 household cluster, one or two households were asked if in the area of the cluster there were any entire families that had died or most of a family had died and survivors were now living elsewhere. We did this to explore the likelihood that families with many deaths were now unlikely to be found and interviewed, creating a survivor bias among those interviewed. Houses with no one home were skipped and not revisited, with the interviewers continuing in every cluster until they had interviewed 30 households. Survey team leaders were asked to record the number of households that were not home at the time of the visit to every cluster.

We tabulated data and calculated the number of births, deaths, and person-months associated with every cluster. For every period of analysis, crude mortality, expressed as deaths per 1000 people per year, was defined as: (number of deaths recorded/number of person-months lived in the interviewed households) X12X1000. We estimated the infant mortality rate as the ratio of infant deaths to livebirths in each study period and presented this rate as deaths per 1000 livebirths.
 
Mortality rates from survey data were analysed by software designed for Save the Children by Mark Myatt (Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK), which takes into account the design effect associated with cluster surveys, and reconfirmed with EpiInfo 6.0. We estimated relative and attributable rates with generalised linear models in STATA (release 8.0). To estimate the relative risk, we assumed a log-linear regression in which every cluster was allowed to have a separate baseline rate of mortality that was increased by a clusterspecific relative risk after the war.[15] We estimated the average relative rate with a conditional maximum likelihood method that conditions on the total number of events over the pre-war and post-war periods, the sufficient statistic for the baseline rate.[16] We accounted for the variation in relative rates by allowing for overdispersion in the regression.[15] As a check, we also used bootstrapping to obtain a non-parametric confidence interval under the assumption that the clusters were exchangeable.[17] The confidence intervals reported are those obtained by bootstrapping. The numbers of excess deaths (attributable rates) were estimated by the same method, using linear rather than log-linear regression. Because the numbers of deaths from the specific causes of death were generally very small, EpiInfo (version 3.2.2, April 14, 2004) was used to estimate the increased risk of cause-specific mortality without regard to the design effect associated with the cluster data.
 

We estimated the death toll associated with the conflict by subtracting preinvasion mortality from post-invasion mortality, and multiplying that rate by the estimated population of Iraq (assumed 244 million at the onset of the conflict) and by 178 months, the average period between the invasion and the survey.
 

This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health Committee on Human Research.

 
Role of the funding source
The sponsors had no role in the design of the study beyond requiring that the crude mortality be measured and that the portion attributable to violence be documented, and they had no role in data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
 

Read the Report in full

 

Contributors
L Roberts was the lead investigator in the field and was principally responsible for the data analysis, interpretation, and preparation of this report. R Lafta was involved in study design, hired, trained, and oversaw the interview staff, led one of the two study teams, coordinated all logistical aspects of the study, and had a central role in data interpretation and preparation of this report. R Garfield advised on
issues of study design, study execution, participated in the analysis and interpretation of data and preparation of this report, and initially organised the study team. J Khudhairi was involved in the study design, interviewer training, and oversaw one of the two survey teams in the field. G Burnham advised on issues of study design, study execution, participated in the analysis and interpretation of data and preparation of this report, and organised and facilitated the ethics review process at Johns Hopkins University.


Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.


Acknowledgments
This survey was funded by the Center for International Emergency Disaster and Refugee Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Small Arms Survey in Geneva Switzerland, whose support is greatly appreciated. Special thanks to Walt Jones for swiftly facilitating this project. Reference support was provided by the Sidney Memorial Library in Sidney, NY, USA and assistance with figure 1 was provided by Marite Jones. This work could not have been completed without a host of brave Iraqis who endured danger, police interrogations, and the risk of being associated with foreign investigators. Many thanks to Elizabeth Johnson and Scott Zeger of the
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, for assistance with data analysis. Finally, thanks to Helen Wolfson for data cleaning and tabulation and Mary Grace Flaherty for editing this manuscript.


References
1
  Global Policy Forum, Save the Children UK. Iraq sanctions:
humanitarian implications and options for the future.
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/sanction/
iraq1/2002/paper.htm
(accessed Feb 7, 2003).

2  Campaign against sanctions on Iraq. http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/casi/index.html (accessed Feb 7, 2003).

3  Clawson PA. Oil for food or the end of sanctions. Policywatch 1998; 303: 1–4.

4  Cordesman AH. Sanctions and the Iraqi people: the WHO report and conflicting views. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1997.

5  Baram A. The effect of Iraqi sanctions: statistical pitfalls and responsibility. Middle East J 2000; 54: 197–223.

6  Rubin M. Food fight. The New Republic; 2001 (June 18): 18.

7  Welch M. The politics of dead children: have sanctions against Iraq murdered millions? Reason Magazine 2002: 52–59. http://www.reason.com/0203/fe.mw.the.shtml (accessed Oct 26, 2004).

8  Reuters News Service. Iraq says sanctions have killed 14 million.
http://CNN.com/WORLD/meast/9808/
10/RB000433.reut.html

(accessed Aug 11, 1998).

9  CPA. An historic review of CPA accomplishments.
http://www.cpa-iraq.org (accessed Sept 26, 2004).

10  Garfield R. Morbidity and mortality among Iraqi children from 1990–1998: assessing the impact of economic sanctions.
http://www.fourthfreedom.org/Applications/cms.php?page_id=7 (accessed Oct 26, 2004).

11  Ali MM, Shah IH. Sanctions and childhood mortality in Iraq.
Lancet 2000; 355: 1851–57.

12  Ali M, Blacker J, Jones G. Annual mortality rates and excess deaths of children under five in Iraq, 1991-98. Popul Stud 2003, 57: 217–26.

13  Berenson A. Killings surge in Iraq, and doctors see a procession misery. New York Times, Sept 26, 2004.

14  Davis M. Counting the civilian cost in Iraq. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3672298.stm (accessed Sept 22, 2004).

15  McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. London:
Chapman and Hall, 1989.

16  Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Oxford Science
Publications, 2002.

17  Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife.
Ann Stat 1979; 7: 1–26.

18  Becker SR, Thornton JN, Holder W. Infant and child mortality in two counties of Liberia: results of a survey in 1988 and trends since 1984. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22 (suppl 1): S56–63.

19  Taylor WR, Chahnazarian A, Wienman J, et al. Mortality and use of health services surveys in rural Zaire. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22 (suppl 1): S15–19.

20  WHO. Health action in crises. http://www.who.int/disasters/stats/baseline.cfm?countryID=62 (accessed Oct 16, 2004).

21  Spiegel PB, Salama P. War and mortality in Kosovo, 1998–99: an epidemiological testimony. Lancet 2000; 355: 2204–09.

22  CDC. Famine-affected, refugee, and displaced populations:
recommendations for public health issues. MMWR Recomm Rep 1992; 41(RR-13): 1–76.

23  CDC. Elevated mortality associated with armed conflict:
Democratic Republic of Congo, 2002.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003; 52: 469–71.8
www.thelancet.com Published online October 29, 2004

 

Source:

http://image.thelancet.com/extras/04art10342web.pdf
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from Elsevier Ltd

Check for latest Site-Updates

Index of Posted Articles

or copy and paste the URL into Google Translate

Important note:

We neither promote nor condone hate speech in any way, shape or form. We have created this website to search for truthful facts that can shape unconventional conclusions and restore historical integrity. The work is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution as well as by Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this website are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This website has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

 
Copyright John McCarthy 2005 if not indicated otherwise

 
Ages ago, I taught my children "never to point with a naked finger towards dressed people" and I usually keep that for myself as well but for this website I have to quote:
"The Emporer Has NO Clothes On!"
Traude
 

 
Want to get in touch? You can send email at:
 

or

Disclaimer And Fair Use