The Evil Of Patriotism When Opposed To Humanism


Perceptions From Abroad

Each of the following links leads to further reports on the related issue.

For additional information see also the section
__________________

Patriotism: Boon or Bane?

__________________

Perceptions of Combat

__________________

Remember Your Humanity!

_______________
Perceptions From Abroad

Appeal To Americans: To my American friends...your last hurrah!

The Horrors Really Are Your America, Mr Bush

The Voice of Hypocrisy

The United States of Torture

The UNITED STATES of MONSTERS: DEPLETED URANIUM

Now they see us as we are

Is This The Death Of America?

IRAQ: The Nemesis Of Imperialism

John S. Hatch: Revolution

The 2005 World Summit & UN General Assembly 60th Session: HYPOCRISY vs. INTEGRITY

U.S. Image Up Slightly, But Still Negative American Character Gets Mixed Reviews

__________________
read also
 
The Hidden Costs of Patriotism:

A THOUSAND NINE ELEVENS

Final Declaration of Brussel's Peace Conference: It is Time to Unite and to Ensure Peace


Related Links

Human Rights Watch

Human Rights Research and Education Centre

Not In Our Name

Very Pissed Off Combat Veterans -- And Blueprints For Change By John McCarthy

Patriotism vs. Humanity

- Perceptions From Abroad -

Home | John McCarthy | CIA | Treason in Wartime | 1941-2001 | Science vs Religion | Reality Or Hoax? | Israel & ME | 9/11 - 3/11 - 7/7 -- Cui Bono? | New World Order | Lies vs Facts | War on Terror - Terrorism of War | Patriotism vs Humanity | War Crimes - Committed 'In All Our Names' | Enviroment & Lobbyism | FOIA & Whistleblowers vs Cover-Ups | Recruiting Lies vs Military Reality | From Democracy to Dictatorship | Empire Agenda | Media Coverage | International (War)Crimes Tribunals | Take Action! - Take Back America! | Summaries & Previews | Index Part 1 | Index Part 2 | Multimedia Index

The Voice of Hypocrisy

12/07/2005 13:13

Condoleezza Rice is either lying through her teeth or else she is a barefaced hypocrite

What is it with US Secretaries of State? Colin Powell gave us a marvelous demonstration at the UN Security Council meeting with his marvelous intelligence of Saddam Hussein's Weapons of Mass Destruction, complete with marvelous plastic models and arrows on photographs. Now Condoleezza Rice would have us believe that, as she says, "We will live up, in the United States, to our commitments under our laws and to our international obligations."

Condoleezza Rice

That statement is simply not true. The United States of America is a country which is based on the rule of law and which is obliged to abide by the terms of its Constitution. Among the commitments to which the United States of America is bound, is the respect for international law.

Nowhere in US constitutional law or international law does it state that it is acceptable or legal to hold someone against his will without trial and torture him. Condoleezza Rice has admitted to the German Chancellor Angela Merkel that in the case of the prisoner detained wrongly and taken to Afghanistan to be tortured, a mistake was made and that the USA immediately rectifies these mistakes when they are made.

But this is not a single case of torture in one single place. The torture is taking place in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Guantanamo and now apparently in CIA bases set up in Europe. What is at stake here is not the illegal or mistaken detaining of one man but the whole philosophy of Washington's approach to international relations.

Condoleezza Rice, as Secretary of State, will know that the USA is bound by its international obligations, that it signed and must respect the UN Charter and Geneva Conventions. It does neither.

The Bush regime uses bullying, blackmail and belligerence as its staple elements for pursuing diplomacy when it should be using debate, dialogue and discussion. The Bush regime lied at the UNSC about Iraq's WMD, the Bush regime continued to lie, and lie, and lie until it was so patently obvious that there never were any WMD in the first place and they had to admit that a mistake had been made, but that nevertheless they were justified because of Saddam's record. Is that why Rumsfeld went to shake the man's hand and stand beside him smiling?

The Bush regime tried very hard to get a second resolution at the UNSC to justify an attack against Iraq. Why spend so much energy? Because the Bush regime knows fully well and Condoleezza Rice has the obligation to know this in her position, that the UN Charter always binds its members to a separate resolution on the use of force. Therefore the attack against Iraq is illegal under international law and the deaths of civilians in this country amount to mass murder, making the leading figures of the Bush regime, the cards in the pack, liable under international law for prosecution as war criminals. The Ace of Spades is Bush himself but Condoleezza Rice, the Queen of Spades, is not off the hook.

The Bush regime is intrinsically linked to cases of torture, not one case but tens of them, around the globe. What a disgusting, sickening comment on a regime whose individual corporate interests dictated a policy which has tarnished the reputation of the nation, destroyed its credibility and relegated its Constitution to the gutter.

Angela Merkel may be satisfied by the comments and smiles of Condoleezza Rice, but she must be the only one who is.

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Source:
Pravda.Ru

cool hit counter

Check for latest Site-Updates

Index of Posted Articles

or copy and paste the URL into Google Translate

Important note:

We neither promote nor condone hate speech in any way, shape or form. We have created this website to search for truthful facts that can shape unconventional conclusions and restore historical integrity. The work is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution as well as by Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this website are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This website has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

 
Copyright John McCarthy 2005 if not indicated otherwise

 
Ages ago, I taught my children "never to point with a naked finger towards dressed people" and I usually keep that for myself as well but for this website I have to quote:
"The Emporer Has NO Clothes On!"
Traude
 

 
Want to get in touch? You can send email at:
 

or

Disclaimer And Fair Use