Evil On The Way
by WILLIAM COOK
February 22, 2003
Bob Woodward's deferent, perhaps even obeisant homage to "Dubya" in his recent book, Bush at War, contains this troubling observation: "The President was casting his mission and that of the country in the grand
vision of God's Master Plan." This frightening perception followed the President's declamation, "We will export death and
violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of this great country and rid the world of evil."
Considering how Bush Jr. grew up beneath the Reagan/Bush baldacchino and then helped guide his father's
ascension to the throne, his connections with the Christian Right has a long and deep history, including familiarity with
the pseudo-prophet, Hal Lindsey, a frequent visitor to the Reagan White House.
Lindsey, the New York Times "Best Selling Author" of the past three decades, author of at least
20 books like The Late Great Planet Earth, and influential Father of Christian Zionism, foresees the imminent and unavoidable great battle of Armageddon, the fulfillment
of John's prophecy in the Book of Revelation, the cataclysmic conflict between the forces of Good against the forces
of Evil, climaxing in our lifetime. Jesus Christ, King of the Jews, will return to rule the world from the rebuilt temple
in the reclaimed nation of Israel according to the prophecies, and we will witness the inevitable suffering and global holocaust.
Lindsey proclaims deliverance from Armageddon depends on understanding God's purposes for the Jews including the restoration
of Israel as a nation in the land of Judea and Samaria.
Lindsey also proclaims that he purposefully writes these books to shock people into believing in Jesus
Christ as their Lord and Savior. And like any good insurance salesman, he instills fear as he threatens his customers with
the plagues revealed in the Acts of the Apostles and the Book of Revelation: "... The sun shall be turned into darkness, and
the moon into blood....With Justice he judges and makes war ... He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood and his name is the
word of God ... Out of his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down nations. .so you may eat the flesh of kings,
generals, and mighty men, of horses and their riders, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, small and great" The Messiah
slays the Antichrist and "creates a new heaven and a new earth" and He judges the dead, saves the Christians, and casts the
rest into eternal perdition.
Lindsey accepts as reality that his interpretations of the prophecies come directly to him from God,
"I believe that the Spirit of God gave me a special insight, not only into how John described what he actually experienced,
but also into how this whole phenomenon encoded the prophecies so that they could be fully understood only when their fulfillment
drew near ... I prayerfully sought for a confirmation for my apocalypse code theory..." This self-proclaimed, God inspired
interpreter of the Bible has had a profound influence on American and British Christians and Jews. Since Ronald Reagan's Christian
based regime of the '80s which included access to the President by not only Lindsey, but Jerry Falwell and the Christian Zionist
televangelist Mike Evans, the interests of Zionism as an integral component of prophetic lure have been central in policy
formation toward Israel in particular and the mid-east generally in both America and the United Kingdom. The current administration,
even more so than Reagan's, is rife with right-wing reliance on the coming revival predicted in the Book of Revelation.
observations made by Paul Krugman of the New York Times December 18, 2002: "Tom DeLay soon to be House majority leader,
told a church group that: 'Only Christianity offers a way to live in response to the realities that we find in this world
only Christianity.' He also said he was on a mission from God to promote a 'biblical worldview' in American politics."
This from the most powerful man in the Congress! And he is not alone. According to Krugman, many leading Congressional Republicans
belong to the "secretive" Council for National Policy, an organization founded by Tim LaHaye, co-author of the apocalyptic
"Left Behind" novels. Members include Pat Robertson, Ralph Reed, Sen. Jesse Helms, Congressman Dick Armey and Tom DeLay of
Texas, Howard Phillips, and many, many others. This fundamentalist group listens, in private, to none other than the self-proclaimed
"Born Again" Christian, George W. Bush. Consider also the appointment of John Ashcroft to the position of Attorney General,
a vocal Christian fundamentalist who "gives every appearance of placing his biblical worldview above secular concerns..."
Add to this the neo-cons in the administration like Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Pearle, Feith, and many others, and one understands
that the ties that bind the neocon Christian right, read Christian Zionists, to the Zionist orthodox Jew cement mentalities
that embrace myths as truth and behavior directed by superstitious beliefs, regardless of those who do not share their zeal.
I believe that the views expressed by Hal Lindsey as they are reflective of beliefs held by "Dominionists,"
including Dr. Tony Evans, founder of Promise Keepers, Dr. Martin Hawkins, Assistant to Evans, James Ryle of the Vineyard Movement
among others, permeate the Bush administration's major figures, most especially the President, guide their approach to foreign
policy, and transform their perception of themselves as executers of God's will. The potential destructive power inherent
in this mentality, that accepts as truth interpretations of mythological stories or willingly uses those interpretations to
exhort others to action, can be understood and can be thwarted before such devastation occurs. That conclusion we can draw
from history should we consider the destructive power of myth as it was wielded by Urban II as he inaugurated the Crusades
to liberate Jerusalem, Innocent III when he exterminated the Cathar sect in the 12th and 13th centuries, the Puritan divines
when they slaughtered the Pequot Indians in 1636-37, and the elimination of the beliefs extant in northern Europe before the
onslaught of Christianity in the middle ages, to offer a few examples. When the elite few who gain power in a country or over
a group of people accept myths as truth, or when they insidiously and ruthlessly use the beliefs people hold to affect their
ends, devastation follows. An enlightened American public can thwart the myth driven elite.
Michael Ortiz Hill, author of Dreaming the End of the World, characterizes Bush, in his essay in CounterPunch January 4, 2003, as "...delusional and the shape of his delusion is specifically apocalyptical in belief and intent." By apocalyptical Hill means that "All systems are supposed to go down so the Messiah can come and Bush, seemingly, has
taken on the role of the one who brings this to pass." "God sovereignly controls all aspects of life" according to this view,
and that understanding is inherent in the teachings of the Promise Keepers Movement and its founder, Dr. Tony Evans, and the
perspective of Billy Graham, two of the prominent right-wing Christians who have influenced Bush. Graham is credited with
Bush's rebirth in Christ and Dr. Tony Evans is pastor of a large Dallas church where Bush heard a great deal about "how the
world should be seen from a divine viewpoint" according to Dr. Martin Hawkins, assistant to Evans. (Hill).
Promise Keepers and the Vineyard Movements according to Gary Gilley in "The Vineyard Movement" accept the doctrine of "end
time" or "dominionism" that believes there will be a seizure of earthly power by God's people (read Christians) to restore
the earth to God's control. Dominion theology teaches that Christ restored dominion over life to the followers of Christ,
but the church now has the obligation of redeeming society in order to bring about the Second Coming. They also contend that
the kingdom of God is now and they have the responsibility to manifest God's power before the entire world. Taking control
of the earth must happen before Christ will return to usher in the physical kingdom on earth over which He will reign.
But Christian Zionists also believe that, before Christ can return, the Jews must return to Israel.
Many evangelical Christians cite Genesis 12 and 13 to demonstrate that "the Jews have title deed to Israel and that the land
must not be given back to the Palestinians," according to Thomas Williamson in his article "To Whom Does the Land of Palestine
Belong?" Christian Zionists, according to Williamson, "regard God's covenant with Abraham, including the land grant, as an
unconditional covenant." More frighteningly, "Every act taken by Israel is orchestrated by God, and should be condoned, supported,
and even praised by the rest of us," notes Grace Halsell in her article "Israeli Extremists and Christian Fundamentalists:
The Alliance." Not all Christians accept this interpretation, but for those who do, the reestablishment of Israel in 1948
ushered in the conditions necessary to bring about the rapture: Jewish control of Jerusalem and rebuilding the temple. Then
and only then can the final, great battle called Armageddon begin. Estimates vary, but Halsell claims "10 to 40 million Americans
believe Palestine is God's chosen land for the Jews"(1). Maintenance of Israel as a nation becomes an obligation on the part
of Christian Zionists if Biblical prophecy is to be fulfilled.
That places George W. Bush in a unique position as a leader of the world's mightiest military power:
to bring about the fulfillment of God's prophecy. Hill claims that Bush has accepted this eschatology through which he sees
himself "as an agent of God who has been called by him to 'restore the earth to God's control'" (2). S.R. Shearer of Antipas
Ministries, notes Hill, calls this delusional. Hill refers to Bob Woodward's new book, Bush at War, to give substance
to this Messianic view of the President. Woodward observes "The president was casting his mission and that of the country
in the grand vision of God's Master Plan" (2). Add to these comments the closing sentence of his 2003 State of the Union Speech,
"The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity," and we can sense his Messianic fervor
as he leads the world against the "man-made" forces of evil.
Unfortunately, the determination of that evil resides in the beliefs of those interpreting the "prophecies"
and those who accept those interpretations as truth. For Lindsey and the Vineyard ministers, God's covenant with the Jews
is truth and it translates, according to Stephen R. Sizer, into the need for America to "continue military and economic funding
of Israel," for Israel to "resist negotiating land for peace," "maintain their apartheid policies," and incite fundamentalist
groups to destroy the Dome of the Rock so the new temple can be built. Lindsey accuses those who refuse to accept this eschatology
as anti-Semitic. This transition from biblical prophecy to current events translates myth into international policy emphasizing
the potential destructive power of mythology. Who are these self-appointed servants of the Almighty who give direction to
Israeli and US leaders regarding the establishment of nation states, the conception and determination of evil, and the righteousness
of actions taken on behalf of their interpretation of God's word?
Lindsey believes, as we have noted, that the Spirit of God has given him special insight "into how this
whole phenomenon encoded the prophecies" Others like James Ryle of Promise Keepers find God giving revelation through dreams
and visions; in Hippo in the Garden, he notes that he was called to preach through a prophetic word situation (91).
In either case, their interpretations come from an indeterminable source, yet a source of vast power and consequence. Lindsey
writes "Only now, as mankind approaches the third millennium, do I feel like the Holy Spirit has provided me with the proper
perspective the Big Picture, so to speak on the mind blowing experiences of the modern world" (Planet Earth 2000
A.D.). And what are those "mind blowing experiences"? "I am certain The Second Advent will occur in the next few years
probably in your lifetime." And, "the greatest threat to freedom and world peace today is Islamic fundamentalism" (The
Final Battle). Acceptance of these modern day prophets and their beliefs by the elite in power portends disaster for American
policy in the mid-east in particular and for American interests generally. But, as we have seen, these ministers of God have
the ear of those in power in the current administration.
Two issues arise immediately: why should America determine its future course based on interpretations
of God's word as contained in documents 2500 years old, designed and written for civilizations long dead? And, second, what
is the evil that these modern day prophets determine as the threat against God's predictions?
Plainly, the Books of Genesis, Daniel, and Revelation, the primary sources for "end-time theology,"
for "Dominionism," for the Apocalyptic perspective, and for Armageddon, while accepted by literalists as the word of God,
are in fact derivatives of stories and ideas from other cultures that anti-date Moses by hundreds of years and John, the purported
author of Revelation, by more than 1700 years. How then can they be the word of God? How can Americans take seriously
the interpretations of Pseudo-prophets who claim to know the meaning of prophecies when they are only the latest in a series
of such claimants that date back to Joachim of Fiore, an Italian monk of the 12th century, Christopher Columbus in the early
1500s, Martin Luther, Thomas Muentzer in the 16th century, the Puritans in America, the interpretations arising out of Nazism
and Marxism, William Miller and John Darby to mention a few who appeared before the most recent group headed by Lindsey (PBS).
There can be no doubt that the Book of Revelation has had a searing impact on the American conscience
that dates back to the establishment of God's "city on a hill" given to the Puritan's by God Himself. The absolute acceptance
of the forces of good and evil as extant and operative in the world, concepts that date back to influences from ancient Greece
and Persia in the 5th to 3rd centuries before Christ, existed without question in the Puritan mind. Hope in the eventual victory
of the forces of good over evil, however, existed long before the 5th century BCE in the "Enuma and Elish" stories of the
struggles between chaos and order that date to 1780 BCE in Mesopotamia. These myths tell of Marduk, the God of light, struggling
against Tiamat, the force of evil, to bring order out of chaos and peace to the world (www.gatewaystobabylon.com). The influence
of these myths on the Book of Genesis, purportedly written by Moses who was born in 1571, is unmistakable and conveyed
directly in Psalm 74:14,15,16. But Marduk is not Yahweh, yet current pseudo-prophets will declare the accuracy of their visions
as direct from God who speaks to humankind from the pages of the Old and New Testaments. They fail to account for the origins
of God's word that comes from non-Jewish sources. Many ancient myths influenced the Bible: the burning of the world by the
Hindu God, Shiva; the Akkadian prophecies from Mesopotamia; the messiah-like king that takes over the world, rewards the just,
and rules forever from the Uruk Prophecy; and the judgment of the dead by the Egyptian god Maat for the good and evil they
performed in their lifetime. (Patricia Eddy, "The Persian Connection: the End of the World Begins")
Judaism also borrowed "angels, the holy spirit, paradise in heaven, eternal life, Judgment Day, the
resurrection of the dead, a fiery hell, a messianic savior, and man's personal responsibility to do God's will" from Persia
(www.alsopreview.com). These same concepts exist in Zoroaster's faith that prevailed in the 6th century BCE. He designed a monotheistic God, Ahura
Mazda, considered by some as a precursor of the God of the Judaic Bible. Zoroaster's last battle between the forces of good
and evil, the biblical Armageddon, is headed by a messiah known as Saoshyant; upon victory, he would herald in a millennium
of peace and plenty. An apocalypse preceded that last battle to gain the attention of the people. Indeed, the Book of Revelation
enlarges upon Zoroaster's end of the world concepts as do sections in the Dead Sea Scrolls discovered in 1947 at Nag Hammadi
and date to the 1st and 2nd centuries CE.
Unfortunately, Christians reading this literature have focused on the necessary and inevitable return
of the Jews to Judea-Samaria as conveyed in one source written by a monk in 950 CE, Adso of Montier-En-Der at the request
of Queen Gerbera of France as he interpreted biblical passages. He also noted that there would arise "the Last World Emperor"
who would unite Christianity and defeat Muslims before the Antichrist arises (PBS). This Christian Zionist focus that requires
the fulfillment of the covenant between God and His chosen people arises from two broad predictions in the Old Testament:
predictions of a return to Palestine from the Babylonian exile and promises of Palestine as the land given by God to the Jews.
Scholars argue about these predictions, some claiming that God fulfilled His promises when the Jews returned to Palestine,
rebuilt the Temple and the Walls of Jerusalem, and restored the religious life of the community under the Maccabees; others
disagree (www.users.cloud9.net). Citations of God's promises to "the descendants of Abraham" for land appear in Genesis 12:7, 13:15, 15:18, 28:13-14 among
others. The dispute caused by these passages has to do with the "seed" to which God promised the land. Zionists argue that
God's promise was to Jews only; others argue that the seed of Abraham includes Arabs (www.mideastfacts.com). Regardless of
these indeterminable disputes, "prominent evangelists preach to their followers that God never fulfilled "His promise of giving
all the land of Palestine to the Jews" (www.mideastfacts.com) and, consequently, support "whatever action necessary, even nuclear war, to obtain Arab lands in the Middle East and
give them to Jews." [emphasis mine] (mideastfacts) Obviously, such interpretations bring the world to the brink
of nuclear holocaust and represent to many in the Christian community a backward step in theology.
Is it possible to believe in the 21st century that a God, designed by a small tribe of nomadic Semites
3500 years ago from stories and myths that existed centuries before in the literatures of Mesopotamia, Persia, Egypt, Canaan,
and elsewhere, could dictate to Americans how they should conduct foreign policy? Myths after all are stories that explain
for a people how they perceive their existence in a world filled with mystery and awe. They create reference points for the
people to see connections between their condition and forces greater than themselves or to understand how they must relate
to the society that surrounds them or to grapple with the internal energies that reside within themselves. Yet we have in
the union of Christian Zionists and Jewish Zionists mentalities that find absolute truth in these myths and willingly inflict
them on the American populace. These beliefs bring ancient prophecies from myths into today's political arena as this comment
from Lindsey's Planet makes all too clear: "The dispute to trigger the war of Armageddon will arise between the Arabs
and Israelis over the Temple Mount and Old Jerusalem (Zachariah 12:2-3), the most contested and strategic piece of real estate
in the world Two religions, Judaism and Islam, thus are on a collision course with global and heavenly repercussions. Islam
will never accept Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the Jewish state, and Israel will never agree to give it up"(155).
Consider the comments of Margot Patterson in the National Catholic Reporter last October 11,
2002: "Thousands of Christian Zionists met in Jerusalem for the Jewish holiday of Sukkot to cheer Sharon and to declare their
unconditional support for the state of Israel." These people embrace "end-time" theology and are supported in turn by right-wing
Israelis who like the economic and political support they bring to the Israeli cause. Christian fundamentalists and Jewish
Messianic settlers, according to Patterson, promise formation of a "Greater Israel" that will usher in Armageddon. They, too,
see war between Muslims and Jews as bringing about the Second Coming.
Patterson quotes a variety of sources to enforce her perception of the political impact these interpreters
of God's word have on America's policies toward Israel and Palestine. James Zogby, President of the Arab American Institute,
argues "despite disclaimers to the contrary the US is waging a war on Islam at home and abroad even as it tacitly supports
extremist settlers in the occupied territories Israel controls." Lewis Roth, President of Americans for Peace Now, says "You
have a number of very conservative Christian groups that support settlements because they see this as a way of strengthening
Jewish hold on the land of Israel because in their mind this is important for end-of-time theology and part of hastening the
Second Coming and the conversion of the Jews" Since Jews have their own Messianic reading of the biblical sources, different
from the Christian Zionists except in the necessity of fulfilling God's covenant to return the Jews to Judea-Samaria, they
find support of the Christian Zionists helpful in bringing about the creation of Greater Israel that would include not only
the borders of the present state but the entire land of Israel described in the Hebrew Scriptures.
Consider as well Robert Kaiser's February 9, 2003 article "Bush and Sharon Nearly Identical on Mideast
Policy" in the Washington Post. Kaiser quotes Richard Pearle, chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, "Israel
should insist on Arab recognition of its claim to the biblical land of Israel and should focus on removing Saddam Hussein
from power in Iraq;" this despite multiple UNSC resolutions that declare Israel in defiance of international law by holding
on to these lands. But there's more! Douglas Feith, undersecretary of defense for policy, has written extensively on Israeli-Arab
issues, and argues, according to Kaiser, "that Israel has as legitimate a claim to the West Bank territories seized after
the Six-Day War as it has to the land that was part of the U.N. mandated Israel created in 1948." Indeed, Donald Rumsfeld
has made the same claim even as he demands that the UN force nations that defy UN resolutions to comply: "There was a war
and they (neighboring countries) lost a lot of real estate to Israel because Israel prevailed in that conflict." Here are
America's Defense Department spokesmen directly contradicting the UN resolutions demanding that Israel comply with international
law and the Geneva Conventions.
Why do these individuals speak for America in this manner? Kaiser quotes a senior official of the first
Bush administration as saying "Sharon played the president like a violin: 'I'm fighting your war, terrorism is terrorism,'
and so on, Sharon did a masterful job." Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, also quoted by Kaiser, claims "President Bush's policy stems
from his core as a Christian, his perceptions of right and wrong, good and evil, and of the need to stand up and fight against
evilI personally believe it is very personal, not a political maneuver on his part." Rev. Richard Land of the Southern Baptist
Convention echoed those sentiments when he noted how important evangelical support for the president is and claimed, "We need
to bless Israel more than America needs Israel's blessing because Israel has a far greater ally than the United States of
America, God Almighty." That observation, you will recall, ended the President's State of the Union address as quoted above.
In short, America has at its helm a man who understands his role in God's plan and is determined to carry forward regardless
of the views of world leaders or the American people. As Dr. Lower points out in Counterpunch, "Bush's war version
of God 'has two dangerous implications' One is that those who have lost their lives in service to God and country (Astronauts)
'weren't actually taking risks or showing bravery because their fate was in God's hands. The other implication is that tragedies
are God's will.' This is in the tradition of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell who suggested that the September 11th tragedy
happened because God had removed his active protection from an immoral United States."
Bush is furthered in his drive to Armageddon by those who surround him, both secular zealots intent
on ensuring Israel's expansion to the biblical lands given it by the covenant or by the religious right that supports Sharon
and controls great Jewish influence in America. Perhaps the most recent evidence of this control on America's mid-east policy
comes in the person of Elliott Abrams, the recently appointed director of Mideast Affairs for the National Security Council.
Abrams has stated categorically: "The Palestinian leadership does not want peace with Israel, and there will be no peace."
Given his current position, we know the future of American policy in Palestine. Abrams' prophecy of no peace allows the Christian
Zionists and the Jewish Zionists to usher in the forces of their perceived good against the forces of their perceived evil,
the Muslims. All of which makes possible the scenario prophesied by Hal Lindsey in The Final Battle, making fiction
truth and truth fiction.
William Cook is a professor of English at the University of La Verne
in southern California. His new book, Psalms for the 21st Century, will be published by Mellen Press in January. He
can be reached at: cookb@ULV.EDU