Issues Of Democracy: Accountability And Its Limits


Cover-Ups

To read the posts on the other issues please use the links named after the different page-subtitles.

For additional information see also the sections
"From Democracy to Dictatorship" and "Empire Agenda" in the Main Navigation
__________________

Reports & Comments

_______________
Related Links

ACLU Offers Legal Counsel to Government Whistleblowers

__________________

Declassified Documents

__________________

FOIA Requests

__________________

Whistleblowers

_______________
Cover-Ups

Bush wielding secrecy privilege to end suits

Bush Administration Claims Presidential Privilege for LBJ Documents

Hearing on Overclassification of Government Documents

_______________

Larry W. Bryant: Uncovering Cover-Ups


Related Links

ACLU: American Civil Liberties Union

Code of Federal Regulations

Freedom of Information Act

Master Lists of Archives

National Whistleblower Center

Open The Government.org

Presidential Libraries

Right to Know

The Black Vault

US Government Corruption Websites

Washington Watchdog.org

Very Pissed Off Combat Veterans -- And Blueprints For Change By John McCarthy

FOIA & Whistleblowers vs. Cover-Ups

- Cover-Ups -

Home | John McCarthy | CIA | Treason in Wartime | 1941-2001 | Science vs Religion | Reality Or Hoax? | Israel & ME | 9/11 - 3/11 - 7/7 -- Cui Bono? | New World Order | Lies vs Facts | War on Terror - Terrorism of War | Patriotism vs Humanity | War Crimes - Committed 'In All Our Names' | Enviroment & Lobbyism | FOIA & Whistleblowers vs Cover-Ups | Recruiting Lies vs Military Reality | From Democracy to Dictatorship | Empire Agenda | Media Coverage | International (War)Crimes Tribunals | Take Action! - Take Back America! | Summaries & Previews | Index Part 1 | Index Part 2 | Multimedia Index

Hearing on Overclassification of Government Documents
 

Emerging Threats: Overclassification and Psuedo-Classification, House Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations, March 2, 2005.

Related resources:

  • Shays Holds Hearing on Overclassification: "Last year, more federal officials classified more information, and declassified less, than the year before. In our previous hearing on official secrecy policies, the Department of Defense (DOD) witness estimated that fully half of all the data deemed "Confidential," "Secret" or "Top Secret" by the Pentagon was needlessly or improperly withheld from public view. Further resisting the call to move from a 'need to know" to a "need to share" standard, some agencies have become proliferators of new categories of shielded data. Legally ambiguous markings like "Sensitive but Unclassified", "Sensitive Homeland Security Information" and "For Official Use Only" create new bureaucratic barriers to information sharing. These pseudo-classifications can have persistent and pernicious practical effects on the flow of threat information."
  • Public Access to Unclassified Data Blocked By Unnecessary Restrictions
  • Hearing, Too Many Secrets: Overclassification as a Barrier to Critical Information Sharing, Tuesday, August 24, 2004

    Permanent Link       Topic(s): Congress, Freedom of Information, Government Documents, Legal Research

     

    Source:
  •  


    Shays Holds Hearing on Overclassification
     
    March 3, 2005

    Dear 9/11 Families and Friends,

    Congressman Christopher Shays, Chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations, held an oversight hearing today about the proliferation of categories of information that are not classified but are withheld from public disclosure. Overclassification of documents has been an area of concern.

    Below are press releases from Congressman Shays and Congresswoman Maloney.

    Warm Regards,
    Mary
    Mother of Brad Fetchet, 24
    Voices of September 11th, Founding Director
    www.voicesofsept11.org



    Shays Holds Hearing on Overclassification

    Washington, D.C. - Today, Congressman Christopher Shays, Chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations, held an oversight hearing about the proliferation of categories of information that are not classified but are withheld from public disclosure. This was a follow-up to a previous hearing on overclassification, which was cited by the 9/11 Commission as a serious impediment to the information sharing required to thwart future terrorist attacks.. Shays is Co-Chair of the 9/11 Commission Caucus. Below is Shays' statement followed by the hearing witness list.

    "The Cold War cult of secrecy remains largely impervious to the new security imperatives of the post-9/11 world. Overclassification is a direct threat to national security.

    "Last year, more federal officials classified more information, and declassified less, than the year before. In our previous hearing on official secrecy policies, the Department of Defense (DOD) witness estimated that fully half of all the data deemed "Confidential," "Secret" or "Top Secret" by the Pentagon was needlessly or improperly withheld from public view. Further resisting the call to move from a "need to know" to a "need to share" standard, some agencies have become proliferators of new categories of shielded data. Legally ambiguous markings like "Sensitive but Unclassified", "Sensitive Homeland Security Information" and "For Official Use Only" create new bureaucratic barriers to information sharing. These pseudo-classifications can have persistent and pernicious practical effects on the flow of threat information.

    "The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (the 9/11 Commission) concluded that, "Current security requirements nurture overclassification and excessive compartmentation of information among agencies. Each agency's incentive structure opposes sharing, with risks (criminal, civil and internal administrative sanctions) but few rewards for sharing information. No one has to pay the long-term costs of over-classifying information, though these costs... are substantial."

    "Those costs are measured in lives as well as dollars. Somewhere in the vast cache of data that never should have been classified, and may never be declassified, is that tiny nugget of information that, if shared, could be used to detect and prevent the next deadly terrorist attack.

    "Recently enacted reforms should help focus and coordinate disparate elements of the so-called "intelligence community" to broaden our view of critical threat information. The previously ignored, and still unfunded, Public Interest Declassification Board has new authority to push for executive branch adherence to disclosure standards, particularly with regard to congressional committee requests.

    "But those promising initiatives still confront deeply entrenched habits and cultures of excessive secrecy. The 9/11 Commission successfully worked through security barriers to access and publish the information they needed. But as soon as the Commission's legal mandate expired, heavy-handed classification practices reasserted themselves. As a result, release of the final staff report on threats to civil aviation was delayed. And the version finally made public contains numerous redactions, some of which needlessly seek to shield information already released by other agencies.

    "The Cold War was a struggle of the Industrial Age. The global war against terrorism is being waged, and must be won, by the new rules of the Information Age. Data and knowledge are the strategic elements of power. With just a few keystrokes, individuals and groups can now acquire technologies and capabilities once the sole province of nation-states. Modern, adaptable networks asymmetrically attack the rigid, hierarchical structures of the past.

    "In this environment, there is security in sharing, not hording, information that many more people need to know. We asked our witnesses this afternoon to help us assess the impact of current access restrictions on efforts to create the trusted networks and new information sharing pathways critical to our national security. We look forward to their testimony."

    WITNESS LIST

    Panel One

    Mr. J. William Leonard, Director

    Information Security Oversight Office

    National Archives and Records Administration

    RADM Christopher A. McMahon, USMS

    Acting Director, Departmental Office of Intelligence, Security, and Emergency Response

    United States Department of Transportation

    Mr. Harold Relyea

    Specialist in American National Government

    Congressional Research Service (CRS) Library of Congress



    Panel Two

    Mr. Richard Ben-Veniste

    Commissioner

    National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States



    Panel Three

    Mr. Thomas Blanton&

    Executive Director

    National Security Archive

    George Washington University

    Mr. Harry A. Hammitt

    Editor and Publisher

    Access Reports: Freedom of Information

    Lynchburg, Virginia

    *Ms. Sibel Edmonds*

    Former Contract Linguist,

    Federal Bureau of Investigation
     
     
    Source:

     

     

      Congress Examines Questionable Handling of Intelligence

    DOJ's suspicious treatment of 9/11 Commission monograph

    under examination by Rep. Maloney

    WASHINGTON, DC - In an insightful hearing on the questionable handling of intelligence since 9/11, the House Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations examined lax procedures at the FBI and the Department of Justice's strange handling of the 9/11 Commission monograph on aviation. The hearing marked the first time FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has appeared before Congress. Rep. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14), who has repeatedly requested the full public release of the commission's monograph, also directed sharp questions to Department of Justice representatives about the delayed release and seemingly spurious redaction of the monograph. 

    "This hearing confirms for me three unsettling things - that we didn't have our act together before 9/11, that the FBI didn't get its act together after 9/11 and that our government doesn't want the truth about that to get out," said Maloney. "Ms. Edmonds's testimony was a disconcerting look into our intelligence community. You would think that, learning important lessons from 9/11, the FBI would be more diligent in its work, but it appears that a September 10th mentality is still in place over there.

    "52 intelligence reports from the FAA between April and September 10, 2001 mentioned Osama bin Laden or Al Qaeda. Five of the intelligence reports specifically mentioned Al Qaeda's training or capability to conduct hijackings, and two mentioned suicide operations, although not connected to aviation. I have concerns that the Bush Administration abused the classification process to improperly withhold the 9/11 Commission findings from Congress and the public until after the November elections and the confirmation of Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State."

    Edmonds was fired from her job as an FBI translator after publicly disclosing the incompetence of many FBI translators hired after 9/11, the close contact between some of her colleagues and organizations under watch by the FBI and FBI employees' practice of taking classified information home.

    Also under scrutiny at the hearing was the treatment of the 9/11 commission's monograph on aviation threats. A heavily-redacted copy of the monograph was finally released to the National Archives in late January 2005 - it was the only monograph not released before the election and it was the only commission report to be redacted. In December, Maloney and Rep. Christopher Shays (CT-04) requested the full release of the monograph

    http://www.house.gov/maloney/press/108th/
    20041202InformationRelease911.htm

    and they repeated that request in February after it became public that the redacted monograph was released to the National Archives

    http://www.house.gov/maloney/press/109th/
    20050210_911Report.htm

    Also in February, Maloney and Rep. Henry Waxman (CA-30) requested full hearings into the monograph
     
     
    Today, Maloney demanded to know why the Department of Justice claimed it was taking its time with the monograph so as not to release any information that would compromise national security, then ended up redacting parts of the monograph that were taken from public hearings (for an example of the redactions, click here:
     

    The monograph cites scores of ignored warnings to the FAA in the months before 9/11 about the possibility of hijackings by al Qaeda.

    Voices of September 11th ("Voices") is a non-profit 9/11 family advocacy group providing information and resources for 9/11 families and survivors. Voices of September 11th makes every effort to present accurate information and to provide an open forum to discuss the related issues. Visit our web site for more information www.voicesofsept11.org 

    Check for latest Site-Updates

    Index of Posted Articles

    or copy and paste the URL into Google Translate

    Important note:

    We neither promote nor condone hate speech in any way, shape or form. We have created this website to search for truthful facts that can shape unconventional conclusions and restore historical integrity. The work is therefore protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution as well as by Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

    In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this website are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This website has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

     
    Copyright John McCarthy 2005 if not indicated otherwise

     
    Ages ago, I taught my children "never to point with a naked finger towards dressed people" and I usually keep that for myself as well but for this website I have to quote:
    "The Emporer Has NO Clothes On!"
    Traude
     

     
    Want to get in touch? You can send email at:
     

    or

    Disclaimer And Fair Use